A Moody View of The Law: Looking Back and Looking Ahead at Law and The Emotions

  • Jeremy A. BlumenthalEmail author
Part of the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation book series (NSM, volume 56)


The current Symposium celebrates 3,400 years of law and emotion. How so? In Leviticus, Chapter 19 Verse 15, judges are instructed to judge rich and poor alike – interestingly, they are, separately, told not to favor the poor and not to favor the rich, but rather to do justice equally. Some interpreters read the prohibition on favoring the poor as trying to ensure that even positive emotions such as sympathy do not bias legal decision-making. Indeed, as this Chapter goes to press, the confirmation hearings for Judge Sonia Sotomayor are highlighting just such issues. Alternatively, we might say that we celebrate more than four centuries of law and emotion: In the late sixteenth century the common law began to recognize the offense of manslaughter, where a killing occurred in the course of a brawl or “chance [or chaunce] medley,” reflecting the passion or emotional state of those engaged in fighting (e.g., Brown 1963; Dressler 1982).1 We might also say that the psychological study of law and emotion is about 100 years old, harking back to the foundational legal psychological work of Hugo Munsterberg (1908) and his study of the biasing impact of emotion on memory and judgment, and of the clues that emotional reactions could give to a defendant’s guilt or innocence.


Moral Judgment Positive Emotion Negative Mood Hate Crime Eminent Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abrams K, Keren H (2007) Law in the cultivation of hope. Calif Law Rev 95:319–381Google Scholar
  2. Alicke MD (2000) Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychol Bull 126:556–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ask K, Granhag P (2007) Hot cognition in investigative judgments: The differential influence of anger and sadness. Law Hum Behav 31:537–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagaric M, McConvill M (2005) Goodbye justice, hello happiness: Welcoming positive psychology to the law. Deakin Law Rev 10:1–26Google Scholar
  5. Bandes SA (1999) The passions of law. New York: NYU PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Barros DB (2009) Legal questions for the psychology of home. Tulane Law Rev 83:645–660Google Scholar
  7. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM (1998) Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? J Pers Soc Psychol 74:1252–1265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckham AS (1933) Over-suggestibility in juvenile delinquents. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 28:172–178Google Scholar
  9. Berkowitz L, Jaffee S, Jo E, Troccoli B (2000) On the correction of feeling-induced judgmental biases. In: Forgas JP (ed) Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131–152Google Scholar
  10. Bernstein DM, Loftus EF (2009) The consequences of false memories for food memories and choices. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4:135–139. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  11. Blumenthal JA (March, 1998) Affective influences on moral reasoning: Implications for psychology and for law. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference, Redondo Beach, CA Blumenthal JA (2002) Law and social science in the twenty-first century. S Cal Interdisciplinary L Rev 12:1–53Google Scholar
  12. Blumenthal JA (2005a) Does mood influence moral judgment? An empirical test with legal and policy implications. Law Psychol Rev 29:1–28Google Scholar
  13. Blumenthal JA (2005b) Law and the emotions: The problems of affective forecasting. Indiana Law J 80:155–238Google Scholar
  14. Blumenthal JA (2007a) Emotional paternalism. Fla State Univ Law Rev 35:1–72Google Scholar
  15. Blumenthal JA (2007b) Perceptions of crime: A multidimensional analysis with implications for law and psychology. McGeorge Law Rev 38:629–651Google Scholar
  16. Blumenthal JA (2008) Abortion, persuasion, and emotion: Implications of social science research on emotion for reading Casey. Wash Law Rev 83:1–38Google Scholar
  17. Blumenthal JA (2009a) “To be human”: A psychological perspective on property law. Tulane Law Rev 83:609–644Google Scholar
  18. Blumenthal JA (March, 2009b) Group deliberation and the endowment effect: An experimental study. Paper presented at the American Psychology/Law Society Conference, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  19. Blumenthal JA, Huang, PH (Jan. 27, 2009). Positive parentalism. National Law Journal. 31:27Google Scholar
  20. Bornstein BH, Wiener RL (2006) Introduction to the special issue on emotion in legal judgment and decision making. Law Hum Behav 30:115–118Google Scholar
  21. Brown BJ (1963) The demise of chance medley and the recognition of provocation as a defense to murder in English law. Am J Leg Hist 7:310–318Google Scholar
  22. Buhai SL (2008) Emotional conflicts: Impaired dispassionate representation of family members. Georget J Leg Ethics 21:1159–1194Google Scholar
  23. Cairns, H (1935) Law and the social sciences. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & CoGoogle Scholar
  24. Carlsmith KM, Darley JM (2008) Psychological aspects of retributive justice. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 40. Academic Press, New York, pp 193–236Google Scholar
  25. Carlsmith KM, Darley JM, Robinson PH (2002) Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:284–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ceci SJ, Friedman RD (2000) The suggestibility of children: Scientific research and legal implications. Cornell Law Rev 86:34–108Google Scholar
  27. Coleman CH (1999) Procreative liberty and contemporaneous choice: An inalienable rights approach to frozen embryos disputes. Minn Law Rev 84:55–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Darley JM, Carlsmith KM, Robinson PH (2000) Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law Hum Behav 24:659–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Demaine LJ (2008) In search of an anti-elephant: Confronting the human inability to forget inadmissible evidence. George Mason Law Rev 16:99–140Google Scholar
  30. Diener E, Biswas-Diener R (2002) Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Soc Indic Res 57:119–169Google Scholar
  31. DiFonzo JH (2000) Customized marriage. Indiana Law J 75:875–962Google Scholar
  32. Douglas KS, Lyon DR, Ogloff JR (1997) The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors’ decisions in a murder trial: Probative or prejudicial? Law Hum Behav 21:485–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dressler J (1982) Rethinking heat of passion: A defense in search of a rationale. J Crim Law Criminol 73:421–470Google Scholar
  34. Dunn J, Schweitzer M (2005) Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. J Pers Soc Psychol 88:736–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Easterlin R (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? J Econ Behav Organ 27:35–48Google Scholar
  36. Feigenson N (1997) Sympathy and legal judgment. Tenn Law Rev 65:1–78Google Scholar
  37. Feigenson N (2000) Legal blame: How jurors think and talk about accidents. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Feigenson N (2001) Another thing needful: Exploring emotions in law [review of Susan Bandes (ed) The Passions of Law]. Const Comment 18:445–461Google Scholar
  39. Feigenson N, Park J (2006) Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: A research review. Law Hum Behav 30:143–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ferguson v. Moore (Tenn. 1897) 39 S.W. 341Google Scholar
  41. Fernberger SW (1930) Can an emotion be accurately judged by its facial expression alone? Am Institute Crim Law Criminol 20:554–564Google Scholar
  42. Fincham FD, Jaspars JM (1980) Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 13. Academic Press, New York, pp 81–138Google Scholar
  43. Fishfader VL, Howells GN, Katz RC, Teresi PS (1996) Evidential and extralegal factors in juror decisions: Presentation mode, retention, and level of emotionality. Law Hum Behav 20:565–572Google Scholar
  44. Forgas JP (1990) Affective influences on individual and group judgments. Eur J Soc Psychol 20:441–453Google Scholar
  45. Forgas JP (1995) Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychol Bull 117:39–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Forgas JP (2002) Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychol Inq 13:1–28Google Scholar
  47. Forgas JP, Ciarrochi J (2001) On being happy and possessive: The interactive effects of mood and personality on consumer judgments. Psychol Mark 18:239–260Google Scholar
  48. Forgas JP, Moylan S (1987) After the movies: Transient mood and social judgments. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 13:467–477Google Scholar
  49. Frank RH (1999) Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of success. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Fredrickson BL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol 56:218–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Gardner v. Florida (1977) 430 U.S. 349Google Scholar
  52. Gorn GJ, Goldberg ME, Basu K (1993) Mood, awareness, and product evaluation. J Consum Psychol 2:237–256Google Scholar
  53. Greene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE, Darley JM, Cohen JD (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293:2105–2108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Grisso T, Saks MJ (1991) Psychology’s influence on constitutional interpretation: A comment on how to succeed. Law Hum Behav 15:205–211Google Scholar
  55. Guthrie C, Sally D (2004) The impact of the impact bias on negotiation. Marquette Law Rev 87:817–828Google Scholar
  56. Haidt JD (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social-intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108:814–834PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hanson JD, Kysar DA (1999) Taking behavioralism seriously: Some evidence of market manipulation. Harv Law Rev 112:1420–1572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Harlé KM, Sanfey AG (2007) Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the ultimatum game. Emotion 7:876–881PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Hauser MD (2006) Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Heiner v. Moretuzzo (Ohio 1995) 652 N.E.2d 664, 670Google Scholar
  61. Hill CA, O’Hara EA (2007) A cognitive theory of trust. Wash Univ Law Rev 84:1717–1796Google Scholar
  62. Holmes OW Jr (1897) The path of the law. Harv Law Rev 10:457–478Google Scholar
  63. Horowitz IA, Kerr NL, Park ES, Goedel C (2006) Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: Emotional bias and juror nullification. Law Hum Behav 30:163–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Huang PH (2000) Reasons within passions: Emotions and intentions in property rights bargaining. Oregon Law Rev 79:435–478Google Scholar
  65. Huang PH (2005) Moody investing and the Supreme Court: Rethinking the materiality of information and the reasonableness of investor. Supreme Court Econ Rev 13:99–131Google Scholar
  66. Huang PH, Anderson CJ (2006) A psychology of emotional legal decision making: Revulsion and saving face in legal theory and practice. Minn Law Rev 90:1045–1071Google Scholar
  67. Huang PH, Blumenthal JA (2009a) Positive law and policy, in Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology 730–733 (Shane J. Lopez ed)Google Scholar
  68. Huang PH, Blumenthal JA (2009b) Positive policy/positive institutions, in Handbook of Positive Psychology 589–597 (C.R. Snyder & Shane J. Lopez eds., 2nd ed.)Google Scholar
  69. Huang PH, Wu H-M (1992) Emotional responses in litigation. Int Rev Law Econ 23:31–44Google Scholar
  70. Inbau FE (1935) Detection of deception technique admitted as evidence. J Crim Law Criminol 26:262–271Google Scholar
  71. Inbau FE (1942) Lie detection and criminal investigation. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  72. Isbell LM, Wyer RS Jr (1999) Correcting for mood-induced bias in the evaluation of political candidates: The roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25(2):237–249Google Scholar
  73. K.A.C. v. Benson (Minn. 1995) 527 N.W.2d 553Google Scholar
  74. Kahan DM (1999) The progressive appropriation of disgust. In: Bandes SA (ed) The Passions of Law. NYU Press, New York, pp 63–79Google Scholar
  75. Kahan DM (2008) Two conceptions of emotion in risk regulation. Univ PA Law Rev 156:741–766Google Scholar
  76. Kahan DM, Braman D (2006) Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law Policy Rev 24:149–172Google Scholar
  77. Kahan DM, Nussbaum M (1996) Two conceptions of emotion in criminal law. Columbia Law Rev 96:269–374Google Scholar
  78. Kahan DM, Hoffman DA, Braman D (2009) Whose eyes are you going to believe? Scott v. Harris and the perils of cognitive illiberalism. Harvard Law Review 122:837–906Google Scholar
  79. Kaplan MF, Miller LE (1978) Reducing the effects of juror bias. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:1443–1455Google Scholar