Advertisement

Experiences with Hexapod-Based Machine Tool

  • R. Neugebauer
  • F. Wieland
  • M. Schwaar
  • C. Hochmuth
Conference paper
Part of the Advanced Manufacturing book series (ADVMANUF)

Abstract

The importance of high-speed cutting in the field of manufacturing engineering has grown in the recent past. Higher cutting velocities and feedrates have allowed a reduction in machining times and/or an increase in workpiece precision, for example, due to narrower line spacing during the milling process. Die and mould making represents one field of application for high-speed cutting, whereby high-speed milling is frequently employed for finish-machining. Thus, the more narrow line spacing enables re-machining to be reduced significantly. The cutting velocities for machining tempered and heat-treated steels are in the range of 1,000 m/min, and the feedrates between 5 and 10 m/min. A survey conducted among various die and mould makers in Germany indicated that dimensional and shape tolerances generally amount to less than 50 µm. Unmachined workpieces for die and mould making processes typically possess a high proportion of freeform surfaces. In terms of roughing depth and manufacturing time, considerable advantages can be gained through employing five-axes milling, the five-axes method makes for superior machining in terms both og technology and economy [1,2]

Keywords

Machine Tool Freeform Surface Workpiece Coordinate System Workpiece Diameter Contour Deviation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Klocke F, Löffler R 1996 Prozeßanalyse bei der Fünfachsen-Fräsbearbeitung. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 91:223–226Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tönshoff H K, Meyerhoff M 1996 Entwicklungs-tendenzen im Werkzeug- und Formenbau. VDI-Zeitschrift 138:20–23Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Merlet J-P 1997 Les robot paralleles. Edition Hermes, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neugebauer R, Wieland F 1997 Application of hexapod based devices in machines. In: 32. MATADOR, Manchester, pp 577–582Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warnecke H-J, Neugebauer R, Wieland F 1998 Development of hexapod based machine tool. Annals of the CIRP 47(1)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neugebauer R, Wieland F, Schwaar M, Gohritz A 1997 Hexapod- Werkzeugmaschine für die Hochgeschwindigkeitsbearbeitung, Zeitschrift für wirtschafilichen Fabrikbetrieb 92:447–449Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neugebauer R, Schwaar M, Wieland F 1998 Accuracy of parallel-structured machine tools. In: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Improving Machine Tool Performance, San Sebastian, July 6–8Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Badrawy S J. 1994 Fertigungsgenauigkeit von Fünf-Achsen-Fräsmaschinen. Dissertation TU BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Konig W, Werner A, Loffler R 1992 Fräsbearbeitung von Druckgießformen mit schlanken Schaftfräsern. Giesserei 79: 922–928Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Neugebauer
    • 1
  • F. Wieland
    • 1
  • M. Schwaar
    • 1
  • C. Hochmuth
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer-Institute for Machine Tools and forming TechnologyChemnitz (IWU)Germany

Personalised recommendations