A Microcomputer-Based System for the Assessment of Postoperative Fatigue

  • S. Stock
Conference paper


The use of a microcomputer to measure postoperative fatigue may seem to be a rather unusual application and therefore it is necessary to describe the background to the study and something of the thinking that was behind the project.


Ambulatory Monitoring Machine Code Variable Gain Amplifier Maximum Sampling Rate Linear Analogue Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Moss NH, Dohan FC (1958) Surgical convalescence: when does it end? Ann NY Acajd Sci 73: 455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sutherland AM (1958) Psychological factors in surgical convalescence. Ann NY Acad Sci 73: 491–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rose EA, King TC (1978) Understanding post-operative fatigue. Surg Gynecol Obstet 147: 97–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Editorial (1979) Post-operative fatigue. Lancet i:84Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen T, Bendix T, Kehlet H (1982) Fatigue and cardio-respiratory function following abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 69: 417–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christensen T, Kehlet H (1984) Post-operative fatigue and changes in nutritional state. Br J Surg 71: 473–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wood CD (1981) Post-operative exercise capacity following nutritional support with hypotonic glucose. Surg Gynecol Obstet 152: 39–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edwards H, Rose EA, King TC (1982) Post-operative deterioration in muscle function. Arch Surg 117: 899–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arnold DL, Bore PJ, Radda GK, Styles P, Taylor DJ (1984) Excessive intracellular acidosis of skeletal muscle on exercise in a patient with post-viral exhaustion/fatigue syndrome. Lancet i: 1367–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Waller AD (1885) Experiments and observations relating to the process of fatigue and recovery. Br Med J 2: 135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waller AD (1891) The sense of effort: an objective study. Brain 14: 179–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Church JM, Choong SY, Hill JL (1984) Abnormalities of muscle metabolism and histology in malnourished patients awaiting surgery: effects of a course of intravenous nutrition. Br J Surg 71: 563–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thorstensson A (1976) Muscle strength, fibre types and enzyme activities in man. Acta Physiol Scand [Suppl] 443: 7–45Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Russell D. M, Prendergast PJ, Darby PL, Garfinkel PE, Whitwell J, Jeejeebhoy KN (1983) A comparison between muscle function and body function in anorexia nervosa: the effect of refeeding. Am J Clin Nutr 38: 229–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scott J, Huskisson EC (1976) Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2: 175–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borg G (1970) Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 2: 92–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edwards RHT, Young A, Hosking GP, Jones DA (1977) Human skeletal muscle function: description of tests and normal values. Clin Sci Mol Med 52: 283–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klidjian AM, Foster KJ, Kammerling RM, Cooper A, Karren SJ (1980) Relation of anthropomorphic and dynamometric variables to serious postoperative complications. Br Med J 281: 899–901PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Astrand PO (1952) Experimental studies of physical working capacity in relation to sex and age. Munksgaard, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bink B, Bonjer FH, Van Der Sluys H (1966) Assessment of the energy expenditure by indirect time and motion study. In: Gunner, Borg (Eds), Physical activity in health and disease. Scandanavian University books, Stockholm, pp 207–214Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maregor J (1979) The objective measurement of physical performance with long-term ambulatory physiological surveillance equipment (LAPSE). In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on ambulatory monitoring. Academic Press, London, pp 29–38Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bassey EJ, Bryant JC, Fentem PH, Maonald IA, Patrick JM (1979) Customary physical exercise in elderly men and women using long-term ambulatory monitoring of ECG and footfall. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on ambulatory monitoring. Academic Press, London, pp 425–432Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dion JL, Fouillot JP, Leblanc A (1981) Ambulatory monitoring of walking using a thin capacitive force transducer. In: Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on ambulatory monitoring. Academic Press, London, pp 420–424Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saltin B, Blomquist G, Mitchell JH, Johnson RL, Wildenthal K, Chapman CB (1968) Response to exercise after bed rest and after training. Circulation 38 [Suppl] 7: 1–78Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bassey EJ, Bennett T, Birmingham AT, Fentem PH, Fitton D, Goldsmith R (1973) Effects of surgical operation and bed rest on cardiovascular responses to exercise in hospital patients. Cardiovasc Res 7: 588–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Snook R (1972) Medical aspects of ambulance design. Br Med J 3: 574–578PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodahl K (1977) Physical work stress. In: Karl I, Anderson (Eds), Physical work and effort. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 206Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fox III SM, Naughton JP, Haskell WL (1971) Physical activity and the prevention of coronary heart disease. Ann Clin Res 3: 404–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kinney JM, Long CL, Gump FE, Duke JH (1968) Tissue composition of weight loss in surgical patients: 1. Elective operation. Ann Surg 168: 459–474PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Stock

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations