Advertisement

The Implications of David Hockney Thesis for 3D Computer Graphics

  • Theodor WyeldEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The debate on whether optics were used to construct perspective images during the Renaissance was reignited by the artist David Hockney’s book Secret Knowledge of the Masters. While others have already discussed this in length, what Hockney brings to the debate are his insights as an artist. What this chapter attempts to do is to explore his thesis in terms of its implications for 3D computer graphics—the latest extension to the Renaissance perspective. Hockney’s assertion that artists from the quattrocento onward painted from mirror and lens-projected images has its implications for the projected images of 3D computer graphics today. Just as technology informed the Renaissance artist on ways of seeing and representing natural phenomena, 3D computer graphics today uses algorithms to simulate these same phenomena. However, neither process can ever approach the absolute clarity of Nature. Attempts to replicate natural phenomena in images are quests for realism—begun in the Renaissance and continued in 3D computer graphics. However, the various techniques used can only ever make the images produced seem real or at least real enough. In the case of the Renaissance artist, this was in the form of painterly techniques to generate the illusion of clarity. For 3D computer graphics, while the mathematical algorithms are adjusted to simulate nature they often simply imitate the quattrocento Masters’ techniques. However, while the Renaissance artist never lost sight of their role in interpreting what they see, 3D computer graphics is supposed to be underpinned by the certainties of its apparent scientific veracity. Hence, is this certainty deserved or is it merely that science and art intertwined in ways that mean one is simply reliant on the other?

Keywords

Computer Graphic Projected Image Fifteenth Century Concave Mirror Projected View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Benoit, B.: Chat Sofa/Carlo Colombo: Modelled in 3Ds Max 2012 and Marvelous Designer, rendered in Vray. www.bbb3viz.com (2011). Accessed 10 May 2012Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coyne, R.: Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age. The MIT Press, Massachusetts (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edgerton, S.Y.: The Heritage of Giotto’s Geometry: Art and Science on the Eve of the Scientific Revolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foley, J.D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S.K., Hughes, J.F.: 3D Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. Addison-Wesley, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gombrich, E.H.: Meditations on a Hobby Horse and other Essays on the Theory of Art. Phaidon, London 1978Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gombrich, E.H.: The Image and the Eye: Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Phaidon, Oxford (1982)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gombrich, E.H.: Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hockney, D.: Secret Knowledge, Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters. Thames & Hudson, London (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kemp, M.: The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. Yale University Press, New Haven (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kemp, M.: The Oxford History of Western Art. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lefebvre, H.: The Production of Space. Blackwell, Oxford (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manovich, L.: The Mapping of Space: Perspective, Radar, and 3D computer graphics. http://manovich.net/TEXT/mapping.html. Accessed 18 Aug 2012
  13. 13.
    Marr, D.: Vision, a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Freeman and Company, San Francisco (1982)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitchell, W.J.: The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-photographic Era. The MIT Press, London (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitchell, W.J., McCullough, M.: Digital Design Media. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Panofsky, E.: Perspective as Symbolic Form (Wood, C. (trans.)). Zone Books, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perez-Gomez, A., Pelletier, L.: Architectural Representation and the Perspective Hinge. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Richens, P.: Computer aided art direction. In: Penz, F., Thomas, M (eds.) Cinema & Architecture. Méliès, Mallet-Stevens, Multimedia, British Film Institute, London (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richens, P.: The piranesi system for interactive rendering. In: CAAD Futures 99, Atlanta, June 1999Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruskin, J.: The Elements of Perspective. Routledge, London (1907)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yorke, T., (photographer) in Steadman, J.P.: Vermeer’s Camera: Uncovering the Truth behind the Masterpieces, Oxford University Press, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Talbott, S.L.: The Future Does Not Compute: Transcending the Machines in Our Midst. O’Reilly & Associates. http://pfaff.newton.cam.ac.uk/mirrors/n…com/people/staff/stevet/fdnc/ch22.html (1995). Accessed 3 July 2002Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tufte, E.R.: Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Graphics, Cheshire (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wertheim, M.: The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet. Doubleday, Sydney (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Woo, M., Neider, J., Davis, T.: OpenGL Programming Guide: The Official Guide to Learning OpenGL, Version 1.1, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts (1997)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    © Kunsthistorisches Museum, Wien, Vienna (10-05-2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    © RMN, Musée du Louvre, Stéphane Maréchalle, Paris (10-05-2012]Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    © TATE Modern, London (10-05-2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    © San Diego Museum of Art, San Diego (10-05-2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    © The National Gallery, London (10-05-2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Supplied by Royal Collection Trust, © HM Queen Elizabeth II 2012, Buckingham Palace, London (10-05-2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations