Advertisement

Six Sigma Life Cycle

  • Pedro A. MarquesEmail author
  • Pedro M. Saraiva
  • José G. Requeijo
  • Francisco Frazão Guerreiro
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing book series (SSAM)

Abstract

This chapter presents the Six Sigma Life Cycle approach, a framework that comprises two interlinked models: the Six Sigma Project Life Cycle model and the Technical System Life Cycle model. The Six Sigma Project LC model consists of a detailed and comprehensive process intended to guide managers and team leaders along all the relevant stages of a Six Sigma project, from identification to post-project, helping them to achieve the project’s goals with minimum expenditure of effort and resources. The Technical System LC model aims to assist them towards the best decision of which Six Sigma methodology, roadmap and toolbox should be used, depending on the degree and type of innovation that are involved in the project scope. Two case studies are described to demonstrate the practical application and usefulness of the framework.

Keywords

Six Sigma Life cycle Project life cycle Technical system life cycle 

References

  1. Anbari FT, Carayannis EG, Voetsch RJ (2008) Post-project reviews as a key project management competence. Technovation 28:633–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antony J, Bañuelas R, Kumar A (2006) World class applications of Six Sigma: real world examples of success. Butterworth-Heinemann, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendell T (2006) A review and comparison of Six Sigma and the lean organizations. TQM Mag 18(3):255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BSI (2010) BS 6079-1:2010: Project management—Part 1: Principles and guidelines for the management of projects. British Standards Institution, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Donaldson KM, Ishii K, Sheppard SD (2006) Customer value chain analysis. Res Eng Des 16:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harry MJ, Linsenmann DR (2006) The Six Sigma fieldbook: how DuPont successfully implemented the Six Sigma breakthrough management strategy. Currency Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. INCOSE (2004) systems engineering handbook—a “what to” guide for all SE practitioners. International Council on Systems Engineering, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar M, Antony J, Antony FJ, Madu CN (2007) Winning customer loyalty in an automotive company through Six Sigma: a case study. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23:849–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McCarty T, Bremer M, Daniels L, Gupta P (2004) The Six Sigma black belt handbook. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Montgomery DC (2005) Generation III Six Sigma. Qual Reliab Eng Int 21(6):3–4Google Scholar
  11. Montgomery DC, Woodall WH (2008) An overview of Six Sigma. Int Stat Rev 76(3):329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pfeifer T, Reissiger W, Canales C (2004) Integrating Six Sigma with quality management systems. TQM Mag 6(4):241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Liedtke C, Choo AS (2008) Six Sigma: definition and underlying theory. J Oper Manage 26(4):536–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Watson GH (2004) Six Sigma for business leaders. GOAL/QPC Publishing, SalemGoogle Scholar
  15. Zu X, Fredenball LD, Douglas TJ (2008) The evolving theory of quality management: the role of Six Sigma. J Oper Manage 26:630–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro A. Marques
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pedro M. Saraiva
    • 2
  • José G. Requeijo
    • 3
  • Francisco Frazão Guerreiro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Strategy and Special ProjectsISQ–Welding and Quality InstituteOeirasPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of Coimbra, Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringNova University of Lisbon, Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations