Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Ammonia-Treated Sugar Beet Pulp
- 373 Downloads
Sugar beet pulp is a carbohydrate-rich coproduct generated by the table sugar industry. Beet pulp has shown promise as a feedstock for ethanol production using enzymes to hydrolyze polymeric carbohydrates and engineered bacteria to ferment sugars to ethanol. In this study, sugar beet pulp underwent an ammonia pressurization depressurization (APD) pretreatment in which the pulp was exploded by the sudden evaporation of ammonia in a reactor vessel. APD was found to substantially increase hydrolysis efficiency of the cellulose component, but when hemicellulose- and pectin-degrading enzymes were added, treated pulp hydrolysis was no better than the untreated control.
Index EntriesBiomass sugar beet pulp enzyme hydrolysis ammonia pretreatment fuel alcohol
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Voorhies, M. Biofuels for sustainable transportation and http://www.ott.doe.gov/ofd/biomass.html.
- 2.Miller, R. (1999), Renewable Fuel Association’s Ethanol Industry Outlook, http://www. ethanolrfa.org/outlook 99/99 industryoutlook.html, RFA publisher.Google Scholar
- 6.Clark, M. A. and Edye, L. A. (1996), in Agricultural Materials as Renewable Resources, Fuller, G., McKeon, T., and Bills, D. D., eds., ACS Symposium Series 647, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 228–247.Google Scholar
- 7.US Dept. of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. (1999), Agricultural Statistics, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 12.McMillan, J. D. (1994), in Enzymatic Conversion of Biomass for Fuels Production, Himmel, M. E., Baker, J. O., and Overend, R. P., eds., ACS Symposium Series 566, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 373–390.Google Scholar
- 13.Grohmann, K., in Bioconversion of Forest and Agricultural Plant Residues, Saddler, J. N., ed., CAB International, Wallingfor, UK, pp. 183–210.Google Scholar
- 17.Dale, B. E., Henk, L. L., and Shiang, M. (1985), Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 26, 223–233.Google Scholar
- 25.Wood, T. M. and Bhat, K. M. (1988), in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 160, Wood, W. A. and Kellogg, S. T., eds., Academic, San Diego, pp. 87–112.Google Scholar
- 26.Dale, B. E. and Moreira, M. J. (1982), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 12, 31–43.Google Scholar