Advertisement

Random Sets pp 47-71 | Cite as

On Estimating Granulometric Discrete Size Distributions of Random Sets

  • Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar
  • John Goutsias
Chapter
Part of the The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications book series (IMA, volume 97)

Abstract

Morphological granulometries, and the associated size distributions and densities, are important shape/size summaries for random sets. They have been successfully employed in a number of image processing and analysis tasks, including shape analysis, multiscale shape representation, texture classification, and noise filtering. For most random set models however it is not possible to analytically compute the size distribution. In this contribution, we investigate the problem of estimating the granulometric (discrete) size distribution and size density of a discrete random set. We propose a Monte Carlo estimator and compare its properties with that of an empirical estimator. Theoretical and experimental results demonstrate superiority of the Monte Carlo estimation approach. The Monte Carlo estimator is then used to demonstrate existence of phase transitions in a popular discrete random set model known as a binary Markov random field, as well as a tool for designing “optimal” filters for binary image restoration.

Key words

Granulometries Image Restoration Markov Random Fields Mathematical Morphology Monte Carlo Estimation Random Sets Size Distribution Phase Transition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    G. MatheronRandom Sets and Integral GeometryJohn Wiley, New York City, New York, 1975.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. SerraImage Analysis and Mathematical MorphologyAcademic Press, London, England, 1982.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. MaragosPattern spectrum and multiscale shape representationIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11 (1989), pp. 701–716.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Schonfeld and J. GoutsiasOptimal morphologicalpatternrestoration from noisybinaryimagesIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13 (1991), pp. 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    E.R. Dougherty, R.M. Haralick, Y. Chen, C. Agerskov, U. Jacobi, and P.H. SlothEstimation of optimal morphological T-opening parameters based on independent observation of signal and noise pattern spectraSignal Processing, 29 (1992), pp. 265–281.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R.M. Haralick, P.L. Katz, and E.R. DoughertyModel-based morphology: The opening spectrumGraphical Models and Image Processing, 57 (1995), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    E.R. Dougherty and Y. ChenLogical granulometric filtering in the signalunion-clutter modelThis Volume, pp. 73–95.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    E.R. Dougherty and J.B. PelzMorphological granulometric analysis of electrophotographic images - Size distribution statistics for process controlOptical Engineering, 30 (1991), pp. 438–445.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    E.R. Dougherty, J.T. Newell, and J.B. PelzMorphological texture-based maximum-likelihood pixel classification based on local granulometric momentsPattern Recognition, 25 (1992), pp. 1181–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    E.R. Dougherty, J.B. Pelz, F. Sand, and A. LentMorphological image segmentation by local granulometric size distributionsJournal of Electronic Imaging, 1 (1992), pp. 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Y. Chen and E.R. DoughertyGray-scale morphological granulometric texture classificationOptical Engineering, 33 (1994), pp. 2713–2722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    E.R. Dougherty and Y. ChengMorphological pattern-spectrum classification of noisy shapes: Exterior granulometriesPattern Recognition, 28 (1995), pp. 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Archambault and M. MooreStatistiques morphologiques pour l’ajustement d’imagesInternational Statistical Review, 61 (1993), pp. 283–297.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Moore and S. ArchambaultOn the asymptotic behavior of some statistics based on morphological operationsSpatial Statistics and Imaging (A. Pos-solo, ed.), vol. 20, Hayward, California: Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Lecture Notes, Monograph Series, 1991, pp. 258–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    K. Sivakumar and J. GoutsiasMonte Carlo estimation of morphological granulometric discrete size distributionsMathematical Morphology and Its Applications to Image Processing (J. Serra and P. Soille, eds.), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1994, pp. 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    S. Geman and D. GemanStochastic relaxation Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of imagesIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6 (1984), pp. 721–741.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    R.C. Dubes and A.K. JainRandom field models in image analysisJournal of Applied Statistics, 16 (1989), pp. 131–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    C.J. GeyerPractical Markov chain Monte CarloStatistical Science, 7 (1992), pp. 473–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    J. Besag, P. Green, D. Higdon, and K. MengersenBayesian computation andstochastic systemsStatistical Science, 10 (1995), pp. 3–66.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    B. GirasMetropolis-type Monte Carlo simulation algorithms and simulated annealingTopics in Contemporary Probability and its Applications (J.L. Snell, ed.), Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1995, pp. 159–232.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    F. Sand and E.R. DoughertyAsymptotic normality of the morphological pattern-spectrum moments and orthogonal granulometric generatorsJournal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 3 (1992), pp. 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    F. Sand and E.R. DoughertyStatistics of the morphological pattern-spectrum moments for a random-grain modelJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 1 (1992), pp. 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    E.R. Dougherty and F. SandRepresentation oflineargranulometric moments for deterministic and random binary Euclidean imagesJournal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 6 (1995), pp. 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    B. Bettoli and E. R. DoughertyLinear granulometric moments of noisy binary imagesJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2 (1993), pp. 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    J. GoutsiasMorphological analysis of discrete random shapesJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2 (1992), pp. 193–215.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    K. Sivakumar and J. GoutsiasBinary random fields random closed sets and morphological samplingIEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 5 (1996), pp. 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    J.J. Binney, N.J. Dowrick, A.J. Fisher, and M.E.J. NewmanThe Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalization GroupOxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1992.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    D. RuelleStatistical Mechanics: Rigorous ResultsAddison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1983.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    H.J.A.M. HeijmansMorphological Image OperatorsAcademic Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1994.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    P. DelfinerA generalization of the concept of sizeJournal of Microscopy, 95 (1971), pp. 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    J. Mattioli and M. SchmittOn information contained in the erosion curveShape in Picture: Mathematical Description of Shape in Grey-level Images (Y.L.O.A. Toet, D. Foster, H.J.A.M. Heijmans, and P. Meer, eds.), Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1994, pp. 177–195.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    J. Mattioli and M. SchmittInverse problems for granulometries by erosionJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2 (1992), pp. 217–232.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    A. Gelman and D.B. RubinInference from iterative simulation using multiple sequencesStatistical Science, 7 (1992), pp. 457–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    G. PotamianosStochastic Simulation Algorithms for Partition Function Estimation of Markov Random Field ImagesPhD Thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 1994.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    J. GoutsiasMarkov random fields: Interacting particle systems for statistical image modeling and analysisTech. Rep. JHU/ECE 96–01, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland 21218, 1996.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    D. SchonfeldOptimal structuring elements for the morphological pattern restoration of binary imagesIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16 (1994), pp. 589–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    D. Stoyan, W.S. Kendall, and J. MeckeStochastic Geometry and its ApplicationsSecond Edition, John Wiley, Chichester, England, 1995.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar
    • 1
  • John Goutsias
    • 2
  1. 1.Texas Center for Applied Technology and Department of Electrical EngineeringTexas A&M University, College StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Image Analysis and Communications LaboratoryThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations