Advertisement

The Gravity Lens Illusion and its Mathematical Model

  • Seiichiro Naito
  • James B. Cole
Chapter
Part of the Recent Research in Psychology book series (PSYCHOLOGY)

Abstract

A small dot near a large circle is perceived as being displaced towards the circle. We call this the Gravity Lens Illusion because it can be described using a geometric model in which the large circle induces changes in the geometrical properties of a surrounding “perception manifold” involving an analogy with general relativity theory in which a massive object changes the geometry of physical space. We regard perceived objects and their orientations as contours and vectors on the perception manifold. In order to compare two objects, they must be moved to a common location. This transport can be carried out either by the mathematical process of Lie dragging or by parallel transport. The latter process assumes that the perception manifold is Riemannian. We follow the Schwarzschild model of general relativity to model the geometry of the perceptual manifold. We find that a dot is easily displaced, while a line segment resists being shifted in a perpendicular direction.

Keywords

Line Segment Parallel Transport Illusory Contour Visual Illusion Subjective Contour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coren, S., & Girgus, J.A. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Coren, S. (1986). An efferent component in the visual perception of direction and extent. Psychological Review, 93, 391–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hubel, D.H., & Wiesel, T.N. (1977). Ferrier lecture; functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B, 198, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lehmann, G. (1981). Figurale Wechselwirkungen im Gesichtsfeld: Experimentelle Analysen stochastischer Feldtheorien der subjektiven Figurbildung. Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie, Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  5. Livingston, M.S., & Hubel, D.H. (1987). Psychophsical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. The Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416–3468.Google Scholar
  6. Misner, C.W., Thome, K.S., & Wheeler, J.A. (1973). Gravitation. New York: Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
  7. Morinaga, S., & Ikeda, H. (1965). Paradox of displacement in geometrical illusion and the problem of dimensions. A contribution to the study of space perception. Japanese Journal of Psychology [in Japanese, with an English abstract], 36, 231–238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Naito, S. (1991). The gravity lens illusion (submitted).Google Scholar
  9. Obonai, T. (1954). Induction effects in estimates of extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 57–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Robinson, J.O. (1972). The psychology of visual illusion. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
  11. Schutz, B. (1988). Geometrical methods of mathematical physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Taylor, M.M. (1962). Geometry of a visual illusion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 52, 565–569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Uchiyama, M., & Muraki, M. (1961). Field measurement of shape by flickering small spot. The 25th convention of the Japanese Psychological Society [in Japanese], p. 74.Google Scholar
  14. von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., & Baumgartner, G. (1984). Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science, 224, 1260–1262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Watson, A. (1977). A theory of the visual illusions. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 30, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Watson, A. (1978). A Riemann geometric explanation of the visual illusions and figural after-effects. In E.L.J. Leeuwenberg & H.F.J.M. Buffart (Eds.), Formal Theories of Visual Perception (pp. 139–169). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Yokose, Z., & Kawamura, H. (1952). A study of the direction of the field force in shape perception (Report No. 1). Japanese Journal of Psychology [in Japanese], 23, 133–143.Google Scholar
  18. Yokose, Z., & Ichikawa, N. (1953). A study of the direction of the field force in shape perception (Report No.2). Japanese Journal of Psychology [in Japanese], 23, 261–274.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seiichiro Naito
    • 1
  • James B. Cole
    • 2
  1. 1.NTT Basic Research LaboratoriesTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Acoustics DivisionNaval Research LaboratoryUSA

Personalised recommendations