The Gravity Lens Illusion and its Mathematical Model
- 177 Downloads
A small dot near a large circle is perceived as being displaced towards the circle. We call this the Gravity Lens Illusion because it can be described using a geometric model in which the large circle induces changes in the geometrical properties of a surrounding “perception manifold” involving an analogy with general relativity theory in which a massive object changes the geometry of physical space. We regard perceived objects and their orientations as contours and vectors on the perception manifold. In order to compare two objects, they must be moved to a common location. This transport can be carried out either by the mathematical process of Lie dragging or by parallel transport. The latter process assumes that the perception manifold is Riemannian. We follow the Schwarzschild model of general relativity to model the geometry of the perceptual manifold. We find that a dot is easily displaced, while a line segment resists being shifted in a perpendicular direction.
KeywordsLine Segment Parallel Transport Illusory Contour Visual Illusion Subjective Contour
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Coren, S., & Girgus, J.A. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Lehmann, G. (1981). Figurale Wechselwirkungen im Gesichtsfeld: Experimentelle Analysen stochastischer Feldtheorien der subjektiven Figurbildung. Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie, Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Livingston, M.S., & Hubel, D.H. (1987). Psychophsical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. The Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416–3468.Google Scholar
- Misner, C.W., Thome, K.S., & Wheeler, J.A. (1973). Gravitation. New York: Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
- Naito, S. (1991). The gravity lens illusion (submitted).Google Scholar
- Robinson, J.O. (1972). The psychology of visual illusion. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
- Schutz, B. (1988). Geometrical methods of mathematical physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Uchiyama, M., & Muraki, M. (1961). Field measurement of shape by flickering small spot. The 25th convention of the Japanese Psychological Society [in Japanese], p. 74.Google Scholar
- Watson, A. (1978). A Riemann geometric explanation of the visual illusions and figural after-effects. In E.L.J. Leeuwenberg & H.F.J.M. Buffart (Eds.), Formal Theories of Visual Perception (pp. 139–169). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Yokose, Z., & Kawamura, H. (1952). A study of the direction of the field force in shape perception (Report No. 1). Japanese Journal of Psychology [in Japanese], 23, 133–143.Google Scholar
- Yokose, Z., & Ichikawa, N. (1953). A study of the direction of the field force in shape perception (Report No.2). Japanese Journal of Psychology [in Japanese], 23, 261–274.Google Scholar