Advertisement

Soil Testing

  • J. T. Cope
  • C. E. Evans
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Soil Science book series (SOIL, volume 1)

Abstract

Most agricultural soils in the virgin state contained some accumulation of nitrogen (N) from tree or grass residues. They were generally low in phosphorus (P) because the parent materials from which they were formed were low in this nutrient. Therefore, P is most frequently the first limiting nutrient when soils are first put into production. Use of chemical fertilizers began with use of P from organic and mineral sources in Europe and the USA. Phosphorus was used to increase production of food and fiber crops and also of legumes used in rotations to supply N. As yields increased from use of P fertilizers, legumes, and later N fertilizers, soils were depleted of other nutrients and a need for potassium (K) and some of the macro- and micronutrients was discovered. Economical production of most crops in developed countries is now dependent on use of fertilizers. Choice of the most profitable rates of the nutrients that may limit yields cannot be made by farmers without a research base that has been developed by agricultural experiment stations.

Keywords

Cation Exchange Capacity Rock Phosphate Relative Yield Soil Test Fertility Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, Fred . 1968. Relative response of grain and annual forage crops to lime, phosphorus, and potassium on Norfolk sandy loam. Ala. Agr. Exp. Stn. Cir. 161.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, Fred, and C.E. Evans. 1962. A rapid method for measuring lime requirement of red-yellow podzolic soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 26: 355–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bear, F.E., A.L. Prince, and J.L. Malcolm. 1945. Potassium needs of New Jersey Soils. N.J. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 721.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, K.C., and E. Truog. 1940. Boron deficiencies as revealed by plant and soil tests. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32: 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bole, J.B., and U.J. Pittman. 1976. Sampling Southern Alberta Soils for N and P soil testing. Can. J. Soil Sci. 56: 531–535.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, R.H . 1929. A field test for available phosphorus in soils. III. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 337.Google Scholar
  7. Bray, R.H., and L.T. Kurtz. 1945. Determination of total organic and available form of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bray, Roger A. 1948. Correlation of soil tests with response to added fertilizers and with fertilizer requirement. Diagnostic techniques for crops and soils, pp. 53–86. The American Potash Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Bray, Roger H. 1961. You can predict fertilizer needs with soil tests. Better Crops With Plant Food 45(3): 18–19, 25–27.Google Scholar
  10. Briggs, K.G. 1974. Soil sampling and soil uniformity for N, P, and K in a small plot area. Can. J. Soil Sci. 54: 115–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron, D.R., M. Nyborg, J.A. Toogood, and D.H. Laverty. 1971. Accuracy of field sampling for soil tests. Can J. Soil Sci. 51: 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carson, P.L. 1980. Recommended nitrate-nitrogen tests. In: Recommended chemical soil test procedures. North Central Regional Publication No. 221 (revised); N.D. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 499 (revised).Google Scholar
  13. Cate, R.B., Jr. and L.A. Nelson. 1971. A simple statistical procedure for partitioning soil test correlation data into two classes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35: 658–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cipra, Jan E., Orville W. Bidwell, David A. Whitney, and A.M. Feyerherm. 1972. Variations with distance in selected fertility measurements of pedons of Western Kansas Ustoll. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36: 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cline, Marlin G. 1944. Principles of soil sampling. Soil Sci. 58: 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cope, J.T . 1973. Use of a fertility index and soil test interpretation. Comm. in Soil Sci. and Plant Analysis 4(2):137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cope, J.T., and R.D. Rouse. 1973. Interpretation of soil test results. In: Soil testing and plant analysis, pp. 35–54. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.Google Scholar
  18. Cope, J.T. 1981. Effects of 50 years of fertilization with phosphorus and potassium on soil test levels and yield at six locations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45: 342–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cope, J.T., C.E. Evans, and H.C. Williams. 1981. Soil test fertilizer recommendations for Alabama crops. Ala. Agr. Exp. Stn. Cir. 251. 55 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Cope, J.T. 1983. Soil-test evaluation experiments at 10 Alabama locations, 1977–82. Ala. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 550. 28 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Council on Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. 1980. Handbook of reference methods for soil testing. Univ. of GaGoogle Scholar
  22. Cox, F.R. 1968. Development of a yield response prediction and manganese soil test interpretation for soybeans. Agron. J. 60: 521–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dyer, B. 1894. On the analytical determination of probable available mineral plant food in soil. J. Chem. Soc. 65: 115.Google Scholar
  24. Ensminger, L.E. 1960. Residual value of phosphates. Ala. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 322.Google Scholar
  25. Fisher, T.R. 1974. Some considerations for interpretation of soil tests for phosphorus and potassium. Mo. Agr. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 1007. 36 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Fitts, J.W., and J.J. Hanway. 1971. Prescribing soil and crop nutrient needs. In: Fertilizer technology and use, pp. 47–79. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.Google Scholar
  27. Hauser, G.F. 1973. The calibration of soil tests for fertilizer recommendations. FAO Soils Bull. 18. Rome. 71 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Hemingway, R.G. 1955. Soil sampling errors and advisory analysis. J. Agr. Sci. 46: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hester, J.B. 1934. Microchemical soil tests in connection with vegetable crop production. Va. Truck Exp. Stn. Bull. 82.Google Scholar
  30. Hue, N.V., and C.E. Evans. 1979. Procedures used by the Auburn University Soil Testing Laboratory .Ala. Agr. Exp. Stn., Dept. of Agronomy and Soils Series No. 16 (revised).Google Scholar
  31. Hue, N.V., C.E. Evans, R.M. Patterson, A.C. Baily, R.L. Schafer, and J.T. Cope. Jr. 1983. A computerized process for soil test data acquisition. Agron. J. 75: 144–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hue, N.V., and Fred Adams. 1979. Indirect determination of micrograms of sulfate by barium absorption spectroscopy. Comm. in Soil Sci. and PI. Anal. 10:841–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keogh, J.L., and R. Maples. 1967. A statistical study of soil sampling of Arkansas aluvial soils. Ark. Agr. Exp. Stn. Report Series 157.Google Scholar
  34. Kitchen, Herminie Broedel (Editor). 1948. Diagnostic techniques for soils and crops. The American Potash Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Lancaster, J.D. 1970. Determination of phosphorus and potassium in soils. Miss. Agr. Exp. Stn. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  36. Liebhardt, W.C., and L. Cotnoir. 1979. Potassium fertilizer recommendations and changes in potassium soil test values as influenced by additions of potassium. Comm. in Soil Sci. and Pl Anal. 10 (5): 831–840.Google Scholar
  37. Liebhardt, W.C. 1981. The basic cation saturation ratio concept and lime and potassium recommendations on Delaware’s coastal plain soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 45: 544–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindsay, W.L. 1974. Role of chelation in micronutrient availability. In: E.W. Carson (ed.), The plant root and its environment, pp. 507–524. The University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  39. McLean, E.O. 1977. Contrasting concepts in soil test interpretation: sufficiency levels of available nutrients versus basic cation saturation ratios. In: Soil testing: correlating and interpreting the analytical results. ASA Special Publ. 29: 39–54.Google Scholar
  40. McLean, E.O., R.C. Hartwig, D.J. Eckert, and G.B. Triplett. 1983. Basic cation saturation ratio as a basis for fertilizing and liming agronomic crops II, field studies. Agron. J. 75: 635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mehlich, A. 1953. Determination of P, Ca, Mg, K, Na, and NH4. North Carolina soil test division (mimeo 1953).Google Scholar
  42. Mehlich, A. 1982. Soil testing methods used by the Agronomic Division, North Carolina Dept. of Agriculture (mimeo 1982).Google Scholar
  43. Melsted, S.W. and T.R. Peck. 1977. The Mitscherlich-Bray Growth Function. In: Soil testing: correlating and interpreting the analytical results. ASA Special Publ. 29: 1–19.Google Scholar
  44. Morgan, M.F. 1932. Microchemical soil tests. Conn. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 333.Google Scholar
  45. Morgan, M.F. 1935. A universal soil testing system. Conn. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 372.Google Scholar
  46. Nelson, L.A. and R.L. Anderson. 1977. Partitioning of soil test-crop response probability. In: Soil testing: correlating and interpreting the analytical results. ASA Special Publ. 29:19–38.Google Scholar
  47. Olsen, S.R., C.V. Cole, Frank S. Watanabe, and L.A. Dean. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939.Google Scholar
  48. Olson, R.A., K.D. Frank, P.H. Grabouski, and G.W. Rhem. 1982. Economic and agronomic impacts of varied philosophies of soil testing. Agron. J. 74: 492–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reed, J. Fielding, and J.A. Rigney. 1947. Soil sampling from fields of uniform and nonuniform appearance and soil type./. Am. Soc. Agron. 39: 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rouse, R.D. 1968. Soil test theory and calibration for cotton, corn, soybeans, and coastal bermudagrass. Ala. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 375. 67 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Sanchez, Pedro A. 1976. Properties and management of soils in the tropics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Spurway, C.H. 1933. Soil testing. A practical system of soil diagnosis. Mich. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 132.Google Scholar
  53. Tisdale, Samuel L., and Werner L. Nelson. 1975. Soil fertility and fertilizers. Third Edition. Macmillan Pub. Co. Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  54. Truog, E. 1930. The determination of the readily available phosphorus in soils. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 22: 874–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Volk, N.J. 1942. Relationship of exchangeable potassium in Alabama soils to needs of the cotton crop. Agron. J. 34: 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walsh, Leo M. and James D. Beaton (Editors). 1973. Soil testing and plant analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, Wis.Google Scholar
  57. Wear, J.I. 1965. Boron. In: C.A. Black (Editor), Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Agronomy 9: 1059–1063. Am. Soc. Agron., Inc., Madison, Wis.Google Scholar
  58. Wear, J.I. and Clyde E. Evans. 1968. Relationship of zinc uptake by corn and sorghum to soil zinc measured by three extractants. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32: 543–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams, H.C., N.V. Hue, and C.E. Evans. 1981. Extracting solutions for routine soil testing of apatite-rich mine spoil. Am. Soc. Agron. Abstracts 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1958

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. T. Cope
    • 1
  • C. E. Evans
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Agriculture, Forestry, and Biological SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations