Advertisement

Competence to Stand Trial

Clinical and Legal Considerations
  • J. Richard Ciccone
Chapter
Part of the Critical Issues in American Psychiatry and the Law book series (CIAP, volume 5)

Abstract

One of the most important and most frequent requests that courts make of psychiatrists is to give an opinion on a defendant’s competence to stand trial. It is difficult to determine the number of psychiatric evaluations for competence to stand trial in a given year in the United States. One study found that 12% of the individuals referred to a court clinic setting were referred for evaluation of their competence to stand trial. In fact, a larger number of referrals had been sent with a request for an evaluation of competence but, on further discussion with the referring person, it was clear that what was being requested in many cases was a psychiatric evaluation regarding need for treatment.

Keywords

Supra Note Acad Psychiatry Forensic Psychiatry Civil Commitment Insanity Defense 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ciccone JR, Barry DJ: Collaboration between psychiatry and the law: A study of 100 referrals to a court clinic. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1977; 4:275–280.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hess JH, Thomas HE: Incompetency to stand trial: Procedures, results and problems. Am J Psychiatry 1963; 119:713–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halleck SL: Psychiatry and the Dilemmas of Crime. New York, Harper 8c Row, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scheidemandel PL, Kanco CK: The Mentally III Offender: A Survey of Treatment Programs. Washington, DC, Joint Information Services, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (GAP): Misuse of Psychiatry in the Criminal Courts: Competency to Stand Trial. New York, Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 1974, p 887.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walker N: Crime and Insanity in England, Volume I: The Historical Perspective. Edinburgh, Scotland, Edinburgh University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (GAP), supra note 5, p 889.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ray I: Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity. Boston, Charles Little and James Brown, 1838. Cited in Bromberg W: The Uses of Psychiatry in Law. Wesport, Conn, Quorum Books, 1976, p 89.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dusky v United States 362 U.S. 402 (1960).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dusky v United States 271 F.2d 385 (8th Cir. 1959).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dusky v United States 295 F.2d 743 (8th Cir. 1961).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    See Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (GAP), supra note 5, p 891.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robey A: Criteria for competency to stand trial: A checklist for psychiatrists. Am J Psychiatry 1965; 122:616–666.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGarry L: Competency to Stand Trial and Mental Illness. New York, Jacob Aronson, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Menzies RJ, Webster CD, Roesch R, Jensen FA, Eaves D: The fitness interview test: A semi-structured instrument for assessing competency to stand trial, with a proposal for implementation. Med Law 1984; 3:151–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    When giving workshops on forensic report writing, including the workshop in Forensic Psychiatry Course: Board Review and Update sponsored by AAPL, it has been my practice to have the participants submit samples of their forensic reports for review and critique by the group. One of the most frequent errors in the submitted reports is equating the presence of a psychotic illness with incompetence to stand trial.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reich JH, Tookey L: Disagreements between court and psychiatrist on competency to stand trial. J Clin Psychiatry 1986; 47:29–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heller MS, Taylor WH, Ehrlich SM, Lester D: Intelligence, psychosis and competency to stand trial. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1981; 9:267–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Colorado v Connelly 305 U.S. 902 (1986).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Washington v Hahn 726 P.2d 25 (Wash. Sup. Ct. 1986).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    New York v Colon 512 N.Y.S.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Melton GB, Petrila J, Poythress NG, Slobogin C: Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers. New York, Guilford Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weinstein HC: Psychiatry on trial: Clinical and ethical problems in the psychiatric assessment of competency to stand trial, in Wright F, Bahn C, Rieber RW (eds): Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry. New York, New York Academy of Sciences, 1980.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ciccone JR, Clements CD: The insanity defense: Asking and answering the ultimate question. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 1987; 15(4):329–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ethical guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. Newsletter Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1987; 4:16–17.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pate v Robinson 383 U.S. 375, 86 (Sup. Ct. 836 1966).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moore v United States 464 F.2d 663 (9th Cir. 1972).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roesch R, Golding SL: Competency to Stand Trial. Chicago, University of Illinois Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    See McGarry, supra note 14, p 55.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jackson v Indiana 406 U.S. 715 (1972).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davis DL: Treatment planning for the patient who is incompetent to stand trial. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1985; 36:268–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    State v Murphy 56 Wash. 2d 761, 355 P.2d 323 (1960).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Winick: Psychotropic medications and competency to stand trial. Am Bar Foundation Res J, 1979, p 1169.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith SM: Competence. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1983; 6:635–650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Washington v Lorer 707 P.2d 1351 (Wash. Ct. App. 1985).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rivers v Katz 67 N.Y. 2d 485 (1986).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    State v Hayes 389 A.2d 1379 (1978).Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    Commonwealth v Louraine 390 Mass. 28, 453 N.W.2d 437 (1983).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    North Carolina v Avery 337 S.E.2d 786 (N.C. Sup. Ct. 1985).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wilson v United States 391 F.2d 460 (D.C. Cir. 1968).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cornell v Set 52 Calif.2d 99, 338 P.2d 447 (1959).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Koson D, Robey A: Amnesia and competency to stand trial. Am J Psychiatry 1973; 130:588–591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bromberg W: The Uses of Psychiatry in the Law: A Clinical View of Forensic Psychiatry. Wesport, Conn, Quorum Books, 1976.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morrow v Maryland 443 A.2d 108 (Md. Ct. App. 1982).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roesch R, Golding SL: Amnesia and competency to stand trial: A review of legal and clinical issues. Behav Sei Law 1986; 4:87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Richard Ciccone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations