In Vitro Mutagenicity Testing of Ohio Coal-Derived Materials

  • Rita Schoeny
  • David Warshawsky
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 27)


In the effort to meet United States energy needs from domestic sources, coals of many origins are being studied for their feasibility in industrial and home heating use. The Ohio Coal Research Laboratory Association, a consortium of 12 university laboratories, has as its objective the study of methods by which Ohio coals may be used productively. Of particular interest is the application of technologies to the efficient use of high-sulfur coals by this region’s basic industries. Our concern has been with health effects of increased coal use. It is likely that more extensive coal combustion, particularly high-sulfur coal, would add to the air pollution burden. Processing coal to cleaner-burning fuels, however, is also not without risks. For example, it is known that workmen employed in the carbonization of coal for coke or for generation of gas have higher than expected risks of cancer at various sites (Lloyd, 1971). Likewise, processing of coal to liquid fuels has been associated with increased cancer risk, and carcinogenicity of coal-derived liquids has been demonstrated experimentally (Weil and Condra, 1960; Ketcham and Norton, 1960; Battelle, 1979). Considering the potential biohazards of using coal in whatever form, the necessity for evaluating risks at an early stage in technological development becomes obvious.


Coal Gasification Petroleum Crude Powdered Coal Revertant Coloni Coal Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ames, B.N., J. McCann, and E. Yamasaki. 1975. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Res. 31:347–364.Google Scholar
  2. Battelle Pactific Northwest Laboratories. 1979. Biomedical Studies of Solvent Refined Coal (SRC-II) Liquefaction Materials: A Status Report. PNL-3189. Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory: Richland, WA. 54 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Epier, J.L., J.A. Young, A.A. Hardigee, T.K. Rao, M.R. Guerin, I.B. Rubin, C.H. Ho, and B.R. Clark. 1978. Analytical and biological analyses of test materials from the synthetic fuel technologies, I: mutagenicity of crude oils determined by the Salmonella typhimurium microsomal activation system. Mutation Res. 57:265–276.Google Scholar
  4. Guerin, M.R., C.H. Ho, T.K. Rao, B.R. Clark, and J.L. Epler. 1980. Polycyclic aromatic primary amines as determinant chemical mutagens in petroleum substitutes. Environ. Res. 23:42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guerin, M.R., I.B. Rubin, T.K. Rao, B.R. Clark, and J.L. Epler. 1981. Distribution of mutagenic activity in petroleum substitutes. Fuel 60:282–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ketcham, N.H., and R.W. Norton. 1960. The hazards to health in the hydrogénation of coal, III: the industrial hygiene studies. Arch. Environ. Health 1:194–207.Google Scholar
  7. Lloyd, J.W. 1971. Long-term mortality study of steelworkers, Volume 5: respiratory cancer in coke plant workers. J. Occup. Med. 13:53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McCann, J., and B.N. Ames. 1976. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals: discussion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73:950–954.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pelroy, R.A., and M.R. Petersen. 1979. Use of Ames test in evaluation of shale oil fractions. Environ. Health Perspect. 30:191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pelroy, R.A., D.S. Sklarew, and S.P. Downey. 1981. Comparison of the mutagenicities of fossil fuels. Mutation Res. 90:233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rosenkranz, H.S., and L.A. Poirer. 1979. Evaluation of the mutagenicity and DNA-modifying activity of carcinogens and noncarcinogens in microbial systems. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 62:873–892.Google Scholar
  12. Savage, R.L. 1980. Design and operation of a second generation flash carbonization unit for the concurrent production of low-sulfur, low-volatile char and synthesis gas (hydrogen and carbon monoxide) with fast response FT-IR analysis of the solids and gas products. UCL project proposal No. IV to Ohio Coal Research Laboratories Association.Google Scholar
  13. Schoeny, R., D. Warshawsky, L. Hoilingsworth, M. Hund, and G. Moore. 1981. Mutagenicity of products from coal gasification and liquefaction in the Salmonella/microsomal assay. Environ. Mutagen. 3:181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weil, C.S., and N.I. Condra. 1960. The hazards to health in the hydrogénation of coal, II: carcinogenic effect of materials on the skin of mice. Arch. Environ. Health 1:187–193.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita Schoeny
    • 1
  • David Warshawsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health, Kettering LaboratoryUniversity of Cincinnati Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations