Advertisement

Polychlorinated biphenyl residues in silos in the United States

  • L. B. Willett
  • J. F. HessJr.
Conference paper
Part of the Residue Reviews book series (RECT, volume 55)

Abstract

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB’s) were described in the scientific literature in 1881 by Schmidt and Shultz, and successful commercial production was achieved in 1930 (Hubbard 1965). The manufacturer of these compounds was Swan and Company who recommended their use in commercial applications for protective coatings, waterproofing, flameproofing, electrical insulation, and adhesives along with multiple miscellaneous uses (Penning 1930). PCB’s were marketed under the trade name of Aroclors by Swan and Company and then by Monsanto Company. Chemically the Aroclors are relatively inert; thus, they are not hydrolyzed by water and they resist alkalies, acids, and other strong corrosive chemicals. They are not appreciably volatile at normal ambient temperatures and have boiling points which are in excess of 275° C (Monsanto Company). They are stable to long periods of heating and can be distilled at ordinary pressure without any carbonization or decomposition. PCB’s are insoluble in aqueous media and very soluble in hydrocarbon solvents. Therefore, these chemical compounds have the chemical and physical characteristics to be persistent in the environment and accumulate up the food chain (Peakall and Lincer 1970).

Keywords

Normal Ambient Temperature Monsanto Company Silo Wall Ensile Process Concrete Silo 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davies, T.: Regulatory action on PCB’s. In U. S. Department of Commerce: Poly-chlorinated biphenyls and the environment. Nat. Tech. Information Service Comm. 72–10419, 173 (1972).Google Scholar
  2. Department of Commerce: Polychlorinated biphenyls and the environment. Nat. Tech. Information Service Comm. 72–10419, 173 (1972).Google Scholar
  3. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration: Final environmental impact statement rule making on poly chlorinated biphenyls. Dec. 18 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration: Polychlorinated biphenyls. Fed. Register 38 (129), 18096 (1973).Google Scholar
  5. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Occupational safety and health standards. Fed. Register 37 (202), 22101 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, R.: The polychlorobiphenyls, their occurrence and significance: A review. Chem. & Ind. 47, 1340 (1971).Google Scholar
  7. Egan, R.: Personal communication (1971).Google Scholar
  8. Fries, G. F.: Polychlorinated biphenyl residues in milk of environmentally and experimentally contaminated cows. Environ. Health Perspectives 1, 55 (1972 a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fries, G. F.: Degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbons under anaerobic conditions. Adv. Chem. Series 111, 256 (1972 b).Google Scholar
  10. Fries, G. F., and G. S. Marrow: Polychlorinated terphenyls as potential contaminants of animal products. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chemists 56, 1002 (1972).Google Scholar
  11. Fries, G. F., A. M. Hartman, and L. P. Dryden: The effect of hexobarbital on the retention of DDT analogs by the rat. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 4, 320 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fries, G. F., G. S. Marrow Jr., C. H. Gordon, L. P. Dryden, and A. M. Hartman: Effect of activated carbon on elimination of organochlorine pesticides from rats and cows. J. Diary Sci. 53, 1632 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fries, G. F., G. S. Marrow Jr., C. H. Gordon: Similarity in behavior of DDE and polychlorinated biphenyl (Aroclor 1254) residues in an environmentally contaminated herd of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 54, 796 (1971).Google Scholar
  14. Fries, G. F., G. S. Marrow Jr., C. H. Gordon: Similarity of a polychlorinated biphenyl (Aroclor 1254) and DDE in rate of elimination from cows. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 7, 252 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fries, G. F., G. S. Marrow Jr., C. H. Gordon: Long-term studies of residue retention and excretion by cows fed a polychlorinated biphenyl (Aroclor 1254). J. Agr. Food Chem. 21, 117 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hubbard, H. L. Chlorinated biphenyl and related compounds. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 2nd ed., p. 289. New York: Interscience (1965).Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, S.: Report of a new chemical hazard. New Sci. 32, 612 (1966).Google Scholar
  18. Jensen, S., A. G. Johnels, M. Olsson, and G. Otterland: DDT and PCB in marine animals from Swedish waters. Nature 224, 247 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuratsune, M.: An abstract of results of laboratory examination of patients with Yusho and of animal experiments. Environ. Health Perspectives 1, 129 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuratsune, M., T. Yoshimura, J. Matsuzaka, and A. Yamaguchi: Yusho, a poisoning caused by rice oil contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls. Public Health Reports 86, 1083 (1971).Google Scholar
  21. Kuratsune, M., T. Yoshimura, J. Matsuzaka, and A. Yamaguchi: Epidemiologic study on Yusho, a poisoning caused by ingestion of rice oil contaminated with a commercial brand of polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ. Health Perspectives 1, 119 (1972).Google Scholar
  22. Monsanto Company: Aroclor plasticizers. Monsanto Industrial Chem. Co. Tech. Bull. O/PL-306A (Undated report).Google Scholar
  23. Nisbet, I. C. T., and A. F. Sarofim: Rates and routes of transport of PCB’s in the environment. Environ. Health Perspectives 1, 21 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peakall, D. B., and J. L. Lincer: Polychlorinated biphenyls, another long-life widespread chemical in the environment. BioScience 20, 958 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Penning, C. H.: Physical characteristics and commercial possibilities of chlorinated diphenyl. Ind. Eng. Chem. 22, 1180 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Platonow, N. S., H. S. Funnell, D. H. Bullock, D. R. Arnott, P. W. Saschenbrecher, and D. G. Grieve: Fate of polychlorinated biphenyls in dairy products processed from the milk of exposed cows. J. Dairy Sci. 54, 1305 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pratt, A. D., R. G. Washburn, and C. F. Rogers: Comparative palatabilities of silages. Ohio Agr. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull. 814 (1958).Google Scholar
  28. Presst, J., D. J. Jefferies, and N. W. Moore: Polychlorinated biphenyls in wild birds in Britain and their avian toxicity. Environ. Pollution 1, 3 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Risebrough, R. W., P. Rieche, D. B. Peakall, S. G. Herman, and M. N. Kirven: Polychlorinated biphenyls in the global ecosystem. Nature 220, 1097 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt, H., and G. Schultz: Einwirkung von Funffach-chlorphosphor auf das α-Diphenol. Ann. Chem. 207, 338 (1881).Google Scholar
  31. Sissons, D., and D. Welti: Identification of polychlorinated biphenyls in commercial mixtures of gas-liquid chromatography, nuclear reasonance and mass spectroscopy. J. Chromatog. 60, 15 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spaulding, J. E., and J. R. Wessel: Occurrence and sources of PCB’s in food. In U. S. Department of Commerce: Polychlorinated biphenyls and the environment. Nat. Tech. Infor. Service Comm. 72–10419, 107 (1972).Google Scholar
  33. Spraul, J. R.: Acid-resistant concrete coatings. Agr. Eng. 22, 209 (1941).Google Scholar
  34. Skrentry, R. F., R. W. Hemken, and H. W. Dorough: Silo sealants as a source of polychlorobiphenyl (PCB) contamination of animal feed. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 6, 409 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Treon, J. F., F. P. Cleveland, J. W. Cappel, and R. W. Atchely: The toxicity of the vapors of Aroclor 1242 and Aroclor 1254. Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. Quart 17, 204 (1956).Google Scholar
  36. Trout, P. E.: PCB and the paper industry—A progress report. Environ. Health Perspectives 1, 63 (1972).Google Scholar
  37. U. S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultures responsibility concerning polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB’s). Office of Science and Education, Washington, D. C., No. 20250(1972).Google Scholar
  38. U. S. Department of Agriculture: Summary of information on the polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) silo problem. Report submitted to the Director of Science and Education, Washington, D. C., Jan. 12 (1973).Google Scholar
  39. Veith, G. D., and G. F. Lee: A review of chlorinated biphenyl contamination in natural waters. Water Res. 4, 265 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willett, L. B.: Does your silo contain PCB residues? Hoard’s Diaryman 118, 610 (1973).Google Scholar
  41. Willett, L. B.: Evaluation of barrier coatings in farm silos which were PCB-contaminated. Ohio Agr. Res. & Dev. Center Res. Summary 69, 36 (1973 a).Google Scholar
  42. Willett, L. B.: Decontamination of silos contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB’s) —Some important considerations. Ohio Agr. Res. & Dev. Center Res. Summary 69, 40 (1973 b).Google Scholar
  43. Willett, L. B.: Unpublished results (1973 c).Google Scholar
  44. Willett, L. B.: Coatings as barriers to prevent polychlorinated biphenyl contamination of silage. J. Dairy Sci. 57, In press (1974).Google Scholar
  45. Willett, L. B., and H. R. Conrad: Coatings as protective barriers to polychlorinated biphenyl residues in contaminated silos (Abstract). J. Dairy Sci. 56, 669 (1973).Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, K. A., R. M. Cook, and R. S. Emery: Effects of charcoal feeding on dieldrin excretion in ruminants. Fed. Proc. 27, 558 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. B. Willett
    • 1
  • J. F. HessJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Dairy ScienceOhio Agricultural Research and Development CenterWoosterUSA
  2. 2.American, Burt and Jones Co., L.P.A.CantonUSA

Personalised recommendations