Advertisement

Primary and intermediate packages

  • H. Lockhart
  • F. A. Paine
Chapter
  • 433 Downloads

Abstract

The choice of packaging for any specific pharmaceutical product is dependent on the following principal factors:
  • • the nature of the product itself — its chemical activity, moisture sensitivity, effect of oxygen and its compatibility with possible packaging materials

  • • the type of patient — e.g. child, elderly adult, male or female, ethnic origin

  • • the form of the dose — free flowing granules, aqueous solution, cream, ointment, inhalation, etc.

  • method and site of administering the medication — oral, topical, parenteral, ear, eye, nose, skin, etc. Whether a dispensing device is to be used, e.g. syringe, dropper, etc.

  • method of distribution — ethical through pharmacies and hospitals, or OTC through retail outlets

  • capacity of the packaging needed — small bulk for pharmacies, OPD, unit dose, etc.

  • required shelf life and likely sales areas.

Keywords

Healthcare Product Butadiene Styrene Styrene Collapsible Tube Blister Pack Good Seal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Paine, F.A. The Packaging User’s Handbook. Part C, Retail Packaging. Blackie, Glasgow (1991). pp. 141–396.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakker, M. Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology. John Wiley & Son. Inc, New York (1986).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goddard, R.R. Packaging Materials. Pira International. Leatherhead, UK (1990).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knappe, J. New Development in Glass Packaging. Pire Review of Packaging. Pira Internatonal. Leatherhead, UK (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dean, D.A. Plastics in Pharmaceutical Packaging. Pira Review of Packaging (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Briston, J. Plastics in Packaging — Conversion Processes. Inst. of Packaging, Melton Mowbray, UK (1983).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guide to Tinplate. Tech. Pub 622. Internat. Tin Res. Inst. (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moody, B.E. Packaging in Glass. Hutchinson, London (1963).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Preston, L. Flexible Packaging Materials — an Update. Pira Review of Packaging (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jonson, G. Corrugated Board Pkg. Pira International, Leatherhead, UK, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kellicut, K.Q. and Landt, E.E. Basic Design Data for Fibreboard Shipping Container. Rep. D1911 Forest Products Lab. US Dept. Agric. (1955).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farmer, N. Caps & Closures for Glass & Plastics. Pira International (1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farmer, N. Closures — an Open & Shut Case. Packaging Technol. Intl. Cornhill Publications, London (1993). p. 101.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anon, Closure Systems for Pharmaceutical Packages. Pkg. (India) 26, 6, (1994). pp. 37–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Lockhart
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • F. A. Paine
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.School of PackagingMichigan State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Center for Food Pharmaceutical ResearchUSA
  3. 3.Committee of RevisionU.S. Pharmacopeial ConventionUSA
  4. 4.School of PackagingMichigan State UniversityUSA
  5. 5.Packaging Technology & ManagementUSA

Personalised recommendations