Advertisement

Effects of Dietary Fish Oil and Corn Oil on Protein Kinase C Distribution in the Colon

  • R. Nelson
  • O. Holian
Chapter
  • 58 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Oncology book series (DION, volume 67)

Abstract

The role of dietary fat in colorectal cancer causation has been problematic. Though cross cultural epidemiologic studies have shown a high correlation between quantity of fat consumption and national cancer rates, within population epidemiologic studies have been far less consistent. Only 7 case control studies have shown a positive correlation between fat consumption and colorectal cancer risk, 10 have not. None of the 4 prospective cohort studies, the strongest epidemiologic tool, have shown a positive correlation. Amongst the strongest epidemiologic evidence for fat as a risk factor is the study of Japanese migrants to Hawaii, where cancer risk in the migrant population has been shown to be associated with increased fat consumption, when compared to low risk Japanese still residing in the same region in Japan. Yet a cohort of that population of Japanese migrants residing in Hawaii followed prospectively has increased their colorectal cancer risk well beyond resident whites, while still consuming almost 25% less fat. For some anatomic sites, the risk of cancer was inversely proportional to fat intake. (1)

Keywords

Colorectal Cancer Risk Japanese Migrant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stemmerman G. In Colorectal Cancer: From Pathology to Prevention? (Ed.s Seitz HK, Simanowski UA and Wright NA). Springer Verlag. Berlin. 1989. pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rogers AE and Nauss KM. Dig. Dis. & Sci. 30. 87s–102s. 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reddy BS and Maruyama H. JNCI. 77. 815–822. 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reddy BS and Maruyama H. Can. Res. 46. 3367–70. 1986.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reddy BS and Sugie S. Can. Res. 48. 6642–47. 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nelson RL, Tanure JC, Andrianopoulos G, Souza G and Lands WEM. Nutr. & Cancer. 11. 215–220. 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Minoura T, Takata T, Sakaguchi M, Takada H, Yamamura M, Hioki K and Yamamoto M. Can. Res. 48. 4790–94. 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kune S., Kune GA and Watson LF. Nutr. & Cancer. 9. 21–42. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Craven PA, Pfanstiel J and DeRubertis FR. J. Clin. Invest. 79. 532–541. 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hirota K, Hirota H, Aguilera G and Catt KJ. J. Biol. Chem. 260. 3243–3246. 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Albanes D. Nutr. & Cancer. 9. 199–217. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Nelson
    • 1
  • O. Holian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations