Advertisement

Education and Competitiveness of Japanese Firms in a Changing Global Economy

  • Hwy-Chang Moon
Chapter
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Several theories have been put forth to describe competitive advantage and its components. One important aspect of competitiveness is derived from people. People are often a reflection of education and culture. Therefore, these two areas must be taken into consideration as primary factors of international competitiveness. This paper discusses the unique characteristics of Japanese education and culture that shape the workforce. It concludes that Japan needs educational and cultural reform to be competitive in a changing global environment.

Keywords

East Asian Country Total Quality Management Harvard Business Review Strategic Management Journal Japanese Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amit, R. and P. Schoemaker (1993) “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaine, M. (Fall 1993) “Profitability and Competitiveness: Lessons from Japanese and American Firms in the 1980s,” California Management Review, 48–74.Google Scholar
  3. Broder, D. (May 11, 1994) “Education Reform: How Serious Is the American Public?” The Stockton Record, A13.Google Scholar
  4. Buckley, P.J. and M.C. Casson (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Cho, D.S. (1984) “The Anatomy of the Korean General Trading Company,” Journal of Business Research, 12(2), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole, R.E. (Spring 1992) “Work and Leisure in Japan,” California Management Review, 52–63.Google Scholar
  7. Conner, K.R. (1991) “An Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools ofThought within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm?” Journal of Management, 17, 121–154.Google Scholar
  8. Dunning, J.H. (1988) “The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: a Restatement and Some Possible Extensions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Durlabhji, S. (Summer 1990) “The Influence of Confucianism and Zen on the Japanese Organization,” Akron Business and Economic Review, 21(2), 31–45.Google Scholar
  10. Dyer, J.H. and W.G. Ouchi (Fall 1993) “Japanese-Style Partnerships: Giving Companies a Competitive Edge,” Sloan Management Review, 51–63.Google Scholar
  11. Egelhoff, W.G. (Winter 1993) “Great Strategy or Great Strategy Implementation—Two Ways of Competing in Global Markets,” Sloan Management Review, 37–50.Google Scholar
  12. Grant, R.M., R. Shani, and R. Krishnan (Winter 1994) “TQM’s Challenge to Management Theory and Practice,” Sloan Management Review, 25–35.Google Scholar
  13. Hamel, G. (1991) “Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances,” Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harper, S.C. (July-August 1988) “Now That the Dust Has Settled: Learning from Japanese Management,” Business Horizons, 43–51.Google Scholar
  15. Hart, J.A. (September-October 1994) “America’s Economic Decline: Evidence and Explanations,” The International Executive, 36(5), 503–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes, R.H. and G.P. Pisano (January-February 1994) “Beyond World-Class: The New Manufacturing Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, 77–86.Google Scholar
  17. Huat, R.C. (1989) “Confucianism and Nation Building in Singapore,” International Journal of Social Economics, 16(8), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kogut, B. (Summer 1985) “Designing Global Strategies: Comparative and Competitive Value-added Chains,” Sloan Management Review, 15–28.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, C.H. (July 1988) “The Koreans and Japanese: Differences within Similarities,” East Asian Executive Reports, 10(7), 17–18.Google Scholar
  20. Levinson, M. (July-August 1987) “Asking for Protection Is Asking for Trouble,” Harvard Business Review,42–47.Google Scholar
  21. Mahoney, J.T. and J.R. Pandian (1992) “The Resource-Based View within the Conversation of Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 13, 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Majumdar, B.A. (Fall 1988) “Industrial Policy in Action: The Case of the Electronics Industry in Japan,” The Columbia Journal of World Business, 23(3), 25–34.Google Scholar
  23. Moon, H.C. (1993) “The Dynamics of Porter’s Three Generics in International Business Strategy,” in A.M. Rugman (ed.) Research in Global Strategic Management, 4,51–64, Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  24. Moon, H.C. and N. Peery (1995) “Competitiveness of Product, Firm, Industry, and Nation in a Global Business,” Competitiveness Review,5(1): 37–43.Google Scholar
  25. Oh, T.K. (1991) “Understanding Managerial Values and Behavior among the Gang of Four: South Korea,Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong,” Journal of Management Development, 10(2), 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohmae, K. (Spring 1987) “Japan’s Role in the World Economy: A New Appraisal,” California Management Review, 29(3), 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Penrose, E.T. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Pfeffer, J. (Winter 1994) “Competitive Advantage through People,” California Management Review, 9–28.Google Scholar
  29. Porter, M.E. (1980) Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Porter, M.E. (1985) Competitive Advantage, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Prahalad, C.K. and G. Hamel (July—August 1990) “The Core Competence of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review,55–70.Google Scholar
  33. Reich, R.B. (January—February, 1990). “Who Is Us?” Harvard Business Review, 53–64.Google Scholar
  34. “Report of the President’s Commission on Industrial Competitiveness,” (1985) Global Competition: The New Reality, 2, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  35. Rugman, A.M. (1981) Inside the Multinationals. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Saha, A. (1992) “Zen and Industrial Management in Japan,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 7(3), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarathy, R. (Summer 1985) `Japanese Trading Companies: Can They Be Copied?“ Journal of International Business Studies, 101–119.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, A. (September 1986) “Will Japan’s Rising Sons Trade Us In?” Esquire, 71–77.Google Scholar
  39. Stevenson, H.W., C. Chen, and S.Y. Lee (January 1, 1993) “Mathematics Achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American Children: Ten Years Later,” Science, 259, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suzuki, D.T. (1959) Zen and Japanese Culture, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Thurow, L.C. (1992, Spring) “Who Owns the Twenty-first Century?” Sloan Management Review, 5–17.Google Scholar
  42. Vernon, R. (July—August 1986) “Can U.S. Manufacturing Come Back?” Harvard Business Review,98–106.Google Scholar
  43. Yoshida, K. (Winter 1992) “New Economic Principles in America-Competition and Cooperation: A Comparative Study of the U.S. and Japan,” The Columbia Journal of World Business, 30–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hwy-Chang Moon
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Institute for International and Area StudiesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations