Advertisement

The Amplifier: Sensing the Depolarization

  • Dennis A. Brumwell
  • Kai Kroll
  • Michael H. Lehmann
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 188)

Abstract

THE ROLE of the sense amplifier in an ICD is to register the occurrence of successive cardiac depolarizations, and, thereby allow measurement of the consecutive time intervals demarcated by these events. This is accomplished in a similar fashion to the familiar external heart monitor that relies on electrocardiogram waveforms. Depolarization of heart muscle is the source of the electrical signals for both the ICD and the external heart monitor, but the waveforms are slightly different due to the location and size of the sense electrodes. Surface electrodes sense voltage waveforms (ECG) of a far-field average of the dynamic voltages from the heart muscle. In contrast, typical intracardiac bipolar electrodes sense a waveform generated by the passage of a depolarization wave through a nearby region of the heart. The intracardiac ventricular electrogram (EGM), as recorded by the ICD, shows a much reduced P-wave amplitude and a narrower QRS complex (R-wave) compared to the surface ECG. The sense amplifier must detect this R-wave and mark each occurrence with a digital pulse suitable for rate counting by other circuitry.

Keywords

Ventricular Fibrillation Automatic Gain Control Lead System Direct Current Voltage Sense Amplifier 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gregorian R, Temes GC. Analog MOS Integrated Circuits for Signal Processing. New York: John Wiley & Sons;1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen P, Holberg D. CMOS Analog Circuit Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston;1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ott HW. Noise Reduction Techniques in Electronic Systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons;1975.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strong P. Biophysical Measurements, 1st ed. Beaverton, Oregon: Tektronix, Inc.;1973.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bahill A. Bioengineering: Biomedical, Medical and Clinical Engineering, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall;1981.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Webster JG. Medical Instrumentation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin;1978.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosenqvist M, Norlander R, Andersson M, et al. Reduced incidence of myopotential pacemaker inhibition by abdominal generator implantation. PACE 1986;9:417–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hayes DL, Vlietstra RE. Pacemaker malfunction. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:828–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erlebacher JA, Cahill PT, Pannizzo F, et al. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:437–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lauck G, von Smekal A, Wolke S, et al. Effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers. PACE 1995;18:1549–1555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gimbel JR, Johnson D, Levine PA, et al. Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers. PACE 1996;19:913–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abber JC, Langberg J, Mueller SC, et al. Cardiovascular pathology and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1988;140:408–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Venditti FJ, Martin D, Long AL, et al. Renal extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy performed in patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator. PACE 1991;14:1323–1325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rasmussen MJ, Hayes DL, Vlietstra RE, et al. Can transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation be safely used in patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers? Mayo Clinic Proc 1988;63:443–445.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Embil JM, Geddes JS, Foster D, et al. Return to arc welding after defibrillator implantation. PACE 1993;16:2313–2318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Man KC, Davidson T, Langberg JJ, et al. Interference from a hand held radio frequency remote control causing discharge of an implantable defibrillator. PACE 1993;16:1756–1758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seifert T, Block M, Borggrefe M, et al. Erroneous discharge of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator caused by an electric razor. PACE 1995;18:1592–1594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dodinot B, Godenir JP, Costa AB, et al. Electronic article surveillance: a possible danger for pacemaker patients. PACE 1993;16:46–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mclvor ME. Environmental electromagnetic interference from electronic article surveillance devices: interactions with an ICD. PACE 1995;18:2229–2230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Madrid AH, Moro C, Martin J, et al. Interferences of the implantable defibrillators caused by slot machines. PACE 1996;19:675. (abstract)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A, et al. Do European GSM mobile cellular phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients? PACE 1995;18:1218–1224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Niaegeli B, Osswald S, Deola M, et al. Intermittent pacemaker dysfunction caused by digital mobile telephones. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1471–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fetter J, Ivan V, Benditt DG, et al. Digital cellular telephones do not necessarily interfere with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) operation. PACE 1996;19:676. (abstract)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stanton MS, Grice S, Trusty J, et al. Safety of various cellular phone technologies with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. PACE 1996;19:583. (abstract)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Madrid AH, Moro C, Chadli, et al. Interferences between automatic defibrillators and mobile phones. PACE 1996;19:676. (abstract)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hofgärtner F, Müller Th, Sigel H. Können mobil-Telefone im C-und D-netz Herzschrittmacher Patienten gefärden? Dtsch Med Wschr 1996;121:646–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singer I, Adams L, Austin E. Potential hazards of fixed gain sensing and arrhythmia reconfirmation for implantable cardioverter defibrillators. PACE 1993;16:1070–1079.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ellenbogen KA, Wood MA, Stambler BS, et al. Measurement of ventricular electrogram amplitude during intraoperative induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:1017–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Callans DJ, Hook BG, Marchlinski FE. Effect of rate and coupling interval on endocardial R-wave amplitude variability in permanent ventricular sensing lead systems. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:746–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perry GY, Kosar Em. Problems in managing patients with long QT syndrome and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a report of two cases. PACE 1996;19:863–867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ellenbogen KA. Cardiac Pacing, Boston: Blackwell;1992. pp 86–89Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bardy GH, Ivey TD, Stewart R, et al. Failure of the automatic implantable defibrillator to detect ventricular fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:1107–1108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brewer JE, Perttu JS, Brumwell DA, et al. Dual level sensing significantly improves automatic threshold control for R-wave detection in implantable defibrillators. PACE 1996;19:2051–2059.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mann DE, Kelly PA, Damle RS, et al. Sensing problems in a third generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator. PACE 1994;17:761. (abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wase A, Natale A, Dhala AA, et al. Sensing failure in a tiered therapy implantable cardioverter defibrillator: role of auto adjustable gain. FACE 1995;18:1327–1330.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sperry RE, Ellenbogen KA, Wood MA, et al. Failure of a second and third generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator to sense ventricular tachycardia: implications for fixed-gain sensing devices. PACE 1992;15:749–755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saksena S, Poczobutt-Johans M, Castle LW, et al. Long-term multicenter experience with a second-generation implantable pacemaker-defibrillator in patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:490–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Callans DJ, Hook BG, Kleiman RB, et al. Unique sensing errors in third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1135–1140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kelly PA, Mann DE, Damle RS, et al. Oversensing during ventricular pacing in patients with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1531–1534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kelly PA, Mann DE, Damle RS, et al. Oversensing during ventricular pacing in patients with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1531–1534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rosenthal ME, Paskman C. Noise generation during bradycardia pacing with the Ventritex Cadence/CPI Endotak ICD system: incidence and clinical significance. PACE 1996;19:677. (abstract)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Spotnitz HM, Ott GY, Bigger JT, et al. Methods of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-pacemaker insertion to avoid interactions. Ann Thor Surg 1992;53:253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Haffajee C, Casavant D, Desai P, et al. Combined third generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with dual-chamber pacemakers: preliminary observations. PACE 1996;19:136–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brooks R, Garan H, McGovern BA, et al. Implantation of transvenous nonthoracotomy cardioverter-defibrillator systems in patients with permanent endocardial pacemakers. Am Heart J 1995;129:45–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lampert RJ, McPherson CA, Lewis RJ, et al. Inappropriate sensing of atrial stimuli in patients with a third generation defibrillator and DDD pacemaker. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:348A-349A. (abstract)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Glikson M, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, et al. The importance of noise reversion in pacemaker-ICD interactions. PACE 1996;19:737. (abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reiter MJ, Mann DE. Sensing and tachyarrhythmia detection problems in implantable cardioverter defibrillators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:542–558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jordaens L, Vertongen P, Provenier F, et al. A new transvenous internal cardioverter defibrillator: implantation technique, complications, and short-term follow-up. Am Heart J 1995;129:251–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bardy GH, Ensuring automatic detection of ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 1992;86:1634–1635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lawrence JH, Fazio GP, DeBorde R, et al. Electrical but not mechanical stunning after endocardial defibrillation. Eur JCPE 1992;2:121 (abstract).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jung W, Manz M, Moosdorf R, et al. Failure of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to redetect ventricular fibrillation in patients with a nonthorocotomy lead system. Circulation 1992;86:1217–1222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Natale A, Sra J, Axtell K, et al. Undetected ventricular fibrillation in transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators: prospective comparison of different lead system-device combinations. Circulation 1996;93:91–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Berul CI, Callans DJ, Schwartzman DS, et al. Comparison of initial detection and redetection of ventricular fibrillation in a transvenous defibrillator system with automatic gain control. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:431–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ruetz LL, Bardy GH, Pearson AM, et al. Paired post-shock electrogram amplitudes for standard and integrated bipolar sensing. PACE 1994;17:743 (abstract).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Brady P, Friedman P Stanton M. Effect of failed defibrillation shocks on electrogram amplitude in a transvenous lead system. PACE 1994;17:785 (abstract).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tchou PJ, Kroll MW. The Angemed Sentinel implantable antitachycardia pacer cardioverter defibrillator in Implantable Cardioverter — Defibrillators, Estes NAM, Manolis AS, Wang PJ (eds). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York 1994.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jung W, Manz M, Moosdorf R, et al. Changes in the amplitude of endocardial electrograms following defibrillator discharge: comparison of two lead systems. PACE 1995;18:2163–2172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Callans DJ, Swarna US, Schwartzman D, et al. Postshock sensing performance in transvenous defibrillation lead systems: analysis of detection ana redetection of ventricular fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophys 1995;6:604–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Smith JR, Kadish AH, Inbar S, et al. Local electrogram changes in response to a high-voltage intracardiac shock in humans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:387–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mattioni T, O-Toole M, Riggio D, et al. Ineffective high energy shocks do not adversely effect subsequent fibrillation detection time in patients with a non-thoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead system. PACE 1994;17(II):850. (abstract)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ellis JR, Martin DT, Venditti FJ. Appropriate sensing of ventricular fibrillation after failed shocks in a transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator system. Circulation 1994;90:1820–1825.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lehmann MH. Hybrid nonthoracotomy systems: lessons from the brouhaha. PACE 1994;17:1802–1807.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Porterfield JG, Porterfield LM, Levine JH, et al. Compatibility of a nonthoracotomy lead system with a biphasic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:586–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gottlieb CD, Schwartzman DS, Callans DJ, et al. Effects of high and low shock energies on sinus electrograms recorded via integrated and true bipolar nonthoracotomy lead systems. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:189–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis A. Brumwell
  • Kai Kroll
  • Michael H. Lehmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations