Advertisement

Patient Followup Systems

  • Ted P. Adams
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 188)

Abstract

THE NEED for patient followup systems for pacemakers evolved out of the unpredictability of component failure, mechanical breakdown, and battery end of life associated with the early devices of the 60’s and 70’s. As reliability and predictability of the devices improved, the character of patient followup changed to involve patient diagnostic data as well as device monitoring. The genesis of ICD/patient followup has followed the same path but in a time span of only 5 years versus 15 years for pacemakers. The device reliability has improved such that the current generations of ICD followup systems are already more concerned with providing data regarding the condition of the patient than of the device.

Keywords

None None Charge Time Battery Voltage Implantable Defibrillator Battery Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rodriguez F, Filimonov A, Henning A, et al. Radiation-induced effects in multi-programmable pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. PACE 1991;14:2143–2153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lehmann MH, Personal communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted P. Adams

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations