Technological Literacy: Implications for Instruction

  • Reg Fleming


It appears that the power and versatility of technology are the source of much of our technological optimism. This optimism was based primarily on the notion that technology held the key to economic prosperity. The manifestation of this optimism was seen in concrete benefits to segments of North American society: Improved clothing, housing, health care, communications, and so on. Technology became the focus of public homage.


Nuclear Power Plant Technological Knowledge High School Graduate Problematic Data Technological Literacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnes, B. (1985). About science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Emig, J. (1983). The web of meaning. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
  3. Fiebleman, J. K. (1966). Technology as skills. Technology and Culture, 7, 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fleming, R. W. (1987). High school graduates1 beliefs about science- technology-society. II. The interaction among science, technology, and society. Science Education, 71, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleming, R. W. (in press). Undergraduate science students1 views on the relationship between science, technology, and society. International Journal of Science Education.Google Scholar
  6. Goldman, S. L. (1984). The techne of philosophy and the philosophy of technology. In P. Durbin (Ed.), Research in philosophy and technology. Volume 7 (pp. 115–144 ). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Habermas, J. (1971). Toward a rational society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Hayter, E. W. (1939). Barbed wire — a prairie invention. Journal of Agricultural History, 13, 189–207.Google Scholar
  9. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kline, S. J. (1985). What is technology? The Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 1, 215–218.Google Scholar
  11. Layton, E. T. Jr. (1976). American ideologies of science and engineering. Technology and Culture, 17, 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nelkin, D. (Ed.). (1984). Controversy: The politics of technical decisions ( 2nd ed. ). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and short-comings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Norman, C. (1981). The god that limps: Science and technology in the eighties. Toronto: George J. McLeod.Google Scholar
  15. Pacey, A. (1983). The culture of technology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Patrick, J. J., & Remy, R. C. (1985). Connecting science, technology, and society in the education of citizens. Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.Google Scholar
  17. Skolimowski, H. (1966). The structure of thinking in technology. Technology and Culture, 7, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Staudenmaier, J. M. (1985). Technology’s storytellers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reg Fleming
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Curriculum Studies, College of EducationUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations