Managing Hearing Loss in Older Adults

Assessment, Intervention, and Technologies for Independence and Well Being
  • Matthew H. Bakke
  • Claire M. Bernstein
  • Scott J. Bally
  • Janet L. Pray
Part of the Aging Medicine book series (AGME)


Hearing Loss Cochlear Implant Noise Exposure Assistive Technology Older Adult 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VII: Hearing loss population top 31 million people. Hear Rev 2005; 12(7):16–29.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lethbridge-Cejku M, Schiller JS, Bernadel L. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey. Vital and Health Statistics, 10 (222):1–151. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Center for Health Statistics. Provisional Report: Summary Health Statistics for U.S. Adults. National Health Interview Survey, 2004. Series 10, Number 228. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steinmetz E. Americans with Disabilities: 2002, Current Population Reports, P70-170. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital and health statistics trends in the health of older Americans: United States, 1994. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brock D, Guralnick J, Brody J. Demography and epidemiology of aging in the United States. In: Schneider E, Rose J, eds. Handbook of the Biology of Aging, 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 1990:3–23.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Center for Health Statistics. Aging in the eighties: functional limitations of individuals 65 years and over. Advance data from vital health statistics. No. 133, Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service, 1987. (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 87–1250.)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garahan MB, Waller JA, Houghton M, Tisdale WA, Runge CF. Hearing loss prevalence and management in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40(2):130–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schow R, Nerbonne M, eds. Introduction to Audiologic Rehabilitation, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2002.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Voeks S, Gallagher C, Langer E, Drinka P. Hearing loss in the nursing home: an institutional issue. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38:141–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abrams W, Beers M, Berkow R. Merck Manual of Geriatrics, 2nd ed. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc., 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goodman A. Reference zero levels for pure-tone audiometer. ASHA 1965; 7: 262–263.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark JG. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA 1981; 23(7):493–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gates GA, Cooper JC, Kannel WB, Miller NJ. Hearing in the elderly: the Framingham cohort, 1983-1985. Part I. Basic audiometric test results. Ear Hear 1990; 11(4):247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearson JD, Morrell CH, Gordon-Salant S, Brant LJ, Metter EJ, Klein LL, et al. Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(2):1196–1205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Tinnitus Association. About Tinnitus (Accessed January 6, 2007, at Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adams PF, Hendershot GE, Marano MA. Current Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1996. Vital and Health Statistics, 10 (200) (Accessed January 8, 2007, at Scholar
  18. 18.
    United States Department of Commerce. Profiles of General Demographic Characteristics, Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2001 (Accessed January 6, 2007, at Scholar
  19. 19.
    Henry JA, Dennis KC, Schechter MA. General review of tinnitus: prevalence, mechanisms, effects, and management. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48(5):1204–1235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luxon LM. Tinnitus: its causes, diagnosis, and treatment. BMJ 1993; 306:1490–1491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perry BP, Gantz BJ. Medical and surgical evaluation and management of tinnitus. In: Tyler RS, ed. Tinnitus Handbook. San Diego, CA: Singular, 2000:221–241.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meikle MB, Creedon TA, Griest SE. Tinnitus Archive, 2nd ed, 2004. (Accessed January 8, 2007, at Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tyler R. Tinnitus Handbook. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 2000.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cutson TM. Falls in the elderly. Am Fam Physician 1994; 49(1):149–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kippenbrock T, Soja ME. Preventing falls in the elderly: interviewing patients who have fallen. Researchers attempt to identify fall-risk factors from the patients’ point of view. Geriatr Nurs 1993;14(4):205–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moscicki EK, Elkins EF, Baum HM, McNamara PM. Hearing loss in the elderly: an epidemiologic study of the Framingham Heart Study Cohort. Ear Hear 1985; 6(4):184–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cooper JC. Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 1971–75: Part I. Ear and race effects in hearing. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5(1):30–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gates GA, Cooper JC. Incidence of hearing decline in the elderly. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 111(2):240–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brant LJ, Gordon-Salant S, Pearson JD, Klein LL, Morrell CH, Metter EJ, et al. Risk factors related to age-associated hearing loss in the speech frequencies. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7(3):152–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein BE, Klein R, Mares-Perlman JA, et al. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148(9):879–886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schuknecht HF, Gacek MR. Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102:1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 2006; 27(1):1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Campbell KC, Rybak LP, Meech RP, Hughes L. D-methionine provides excellent protection from cisplatin ototoxicity in the rat. Hear Res 1996; 102:90–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nicotera TM, Hu BH, Henderson D. The caspase pathway in noise-induced apoptosis of the chinchilla cochlea. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2003; 4(4):466–477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Seidman MD. Effects of dietary restriction and antioxidants on presbyacusis. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:727–738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gates GA, Couropmitree NN, Myers RH. Genetic associations in age-related hearing thresholds. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125(6):654–659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Johnson KR, Zheng QY, Erway LC. A major gene affecting age-related hearing loss is common to at least ten inbred strains of mice. Genomics 2000; 70(2):171–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jimenez AM, Stagner BB, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL. Susceptibility of DPOAEs to sound overexposure in inbred mice with AHL. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2001; 2(3):233–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ballanchanda B. Cerumen and the ear canal secretory system. In: Ballanchanda B, ed. Introduction to the Human Ear Canal. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1995: 181–201.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Novak R. Considerations for selecting and fitting of amplification for geriatric adults. In: Sandlin RE, ed. Textbook of Hearing Aid Amplification. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 2000: 571–606.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gleitman R, Ballachanda B, Goldstein. Incidence of cerumen impaction in general adult population. Hear J 1992; 45:28–32.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Willott J. Aging and the Auditory System. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1991.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Otte J, Schunknecht HF, Kerr AG. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1978; 88:1231–1246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Suzuka Y, Schuknecht HF. Retrograde cochlear neuronal degeneration in human subjects. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1988; 450:1–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pauler M, Schuknecht HF, Thornton AR. Correlative studies of cochlear neuronal loss with speech discrimination and pure-tone thresholds. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1986; 243(3):200–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Crandell C, Henoch M, Dunkerson K. A review of speech perception and aging: Some implications for aural rehabilitation. J Am Acad Rehabil Audiol 1991; 24:121–133.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bellis TJ, Wilber LA. Effects of aging and gender on interhemispheric function. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44(2):246–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wiley TL, Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS, Klein R, Klein BE. Aging and word recognition in competing message. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9(3):191–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stach BA, Spretnjak ML, Jerger J. The prevalence of central presbyacusis in a clinical population. J Am Acad Audiol 1990; 1(2):109–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Martin JS, Jerger JF. Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42(4 Suppl 2):25–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42(4 Suppl 2):9–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wingfield A, Tun PA. Spoken language comprehension in older adults: Interactions between sensory and cognitive change in normal aging. Sem Hear 2001; 22:287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons P. Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40:423–431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bentler R. Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16(7):473–484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jerger J, Chmiel R, Florin E, Pirozzolo F, Wilson N. Comparison of conventional amplification and an assistive listening device in elderly persons. Ear Hear 1996; 17:490–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gatehouse S, Naylor G, Elberling C. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J Audiol 2003; 42(Suppl 1):S77–S85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pichora-Fuller MK, Singh G. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends Amplif 2006; 10(1):29–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Greenwald R, Jerger J. Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry on a competing speech task. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12:167–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Byrne D. Clinical issues and options in binaural hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear 1981; 2:187–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Walden T, Walden B. Unilateral versus bilateral amplification for adults with impaired hearing. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16:574–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Boothroyd A. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone. Ear Hear 2004; 25(1):22–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Chisolm T, McArdle R, Abrams H, Noe C. Goals and outcomes of FM use by adults. Hear J 2004; 57:28–35.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Russell E, Burns A. Presentation and clinical management of dementia. In: Tallis R, Fillitt H, Brockelhurst J, eds. Brockelhurst’s Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1999: 727–740.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Uhlmann R, Larson E, Rees T, Koespell T, Duckert L. Relationship of hearing impairment to dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older adults. J Am Med Assoc 1989; 261: 1916–1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Grimes A. Auditory changes. In: Lubinski R, ed. Dementia and Communication. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1995: 47–69.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kricos PB. Audiologic management of older adults with hearing loss and compromised cognitive/psychoacoustic auditory processing capabilities. Trends Amplif 2006; 10(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Mulrow C, Tuley M, Aguilar C. Sustained benefits of hearing aids. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1992; 35:1402–1405.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wallhagen M, Strawbridge W, Shema S. Impact of self-assessed hearing loss on a spouse: A longitudinal analysis of couples. J Geront Soc Sci 2004; 59:S190–S196.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kaplan H. Benefits and limitations of amplification and speechreading for the elderly. In: Orlans H, ed. Adjustment to Adult Hearing Loss. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 1991: 85–98.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Webb L, Schreiner J, Asmuth M. Maintaining interaction skills. In: Huntley R, Helfer K, eds. Communication Skills in Later Life. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann, 1995: 159–179.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cacciatore F, Abete P, Napoli C, Marciano E, Triassi M, Rengo F. Quality of life determinants and hearing function in an elderly population. Gerontology 1999; 45:323–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hession C. Hearing loss and aging: Psychosocial aspects and implications for rehabilitation. Texas J Audiol Speech Path 1991; 17(2):10–13.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Meadow-Orlans K. Social and psychological effects of hearing loss in adulthood: A literature review. In: Orlans H, ed. Adjustment to Adult Hearing Loss. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1991: 35–57.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Pray J. Parallel reactions in hearing loss in later years. An Elderhostel Guide and Course Supplement. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, 1996.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ventry I, Weinstein B. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear 1982; 3(3):128–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Beck RL. The forgotten family. SHHH 1991; 12(1):7–9.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Newman C, Weinstein B. Judgments of perceived hearing handicap by hearing-impaired elderly men and their spouses. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1996; 19:109–115.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Quinn KS. Self spouse and audioloqist evaluation of hearinq impairment and hearing handicap in a sample of older people (dissertation): University of Michigan;1986.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Palmer C. Improvement of hearing function. In: Huntley RA, Helfer KS, eds. Communication in Later Life. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1995: 181–221.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hooker K, Shifren K. Psychological aspects of aging. In: Huntley RA, Helfer KS, eds. Communication in Later Life. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1995: 99–126.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Pray J. Aging and hearing loss: Patterns of coping with the effects of late onset hearing loss among persons 60 and older and their spouses/significant others.(dissertation): The Union Institute;1992.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gould R. Transformations. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Erikson E, Erikson J, Kivnick H. Vital Involvement in Old Age. New York: W. Norton, 1986.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Maurer J, Rupp R. Hearing and Aging. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1979.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Glass L. Psychosocial aspects of hearing loss in adulthood. In: Orlans H, ed. Adjustment to Adult Hearing Loss. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 1991: 167–178.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Schlesinger HS. The psychology of hearing loss. In: Orlans H, ed. Adjustment to Adult Hearing Loss. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1985: 99–118.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Perlstein R. Mature market report. Mature Market Report, Inc. Atlanta, GA: College-Hill Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ross M. Why people won’t wear hearing aids. Hear Rehabil Quart 1992; 17(2).Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Harvey MA. Psychotherapy with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Persons: A systemic model. 2nd ed. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Weinstein B. Geriatric Audiology. New York: Thieme, 2000.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hooyman N, Kivak H. Social Gerontology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1999.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Brennan M, Heiser D. Spiritual Assessment and Intervention Among Older Adults. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Pastoral Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Brennan M. Spirituality and religiousness predict adaptation to vision loss among middle-age and older adults. Int J Psy Rel 2004;14(3):193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Kubler-Ross F. On Death and Dying. New York: McMillan, 1969.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Carabellese C, Appolonio I, Rozzini R, Bianchetti A, Frisoni G, Frattola L, et al. Sensory impairment and quality of life in a community elderly population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41:401–407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Maggi S, Minicicuci N, Martini A, Langlois J, Siviero P, Pavan, et al. Prevalence rates of hearing impairment and comorbid conditions in older people: The Veneto Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46:1069–1074.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Strawbridge W, Wallhagen M, Shema S, Kaplan G. Negative consequences of hearing impairment in old age: A longitudinal analysis. Gerontologist 2000; 40:320–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Bazargan M, Baker R, Bazargan H. Sensory impairments and subjective well being among aged African American persons. J Geront 2001; 56B(5):268–278.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Almeida O. Clinical and cognitive diversity of psychotic states arising in late life-late paraphrenia. (dissertation). University of London, England; 1993.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Appollonio I, Carabellese C, Frattola L, Trabucchi M. Effects of sensory aids on the quality of life and mortality of elderly people: a multivariate analysis. Age Aging 1996; 25(2):89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kreeger J, Raulin M, Grace J, Priest B. Effect of hearing enhancement on mental status ratings in geriatric psychiatric patients. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:629–631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Bazargan M, Barbe A. The effects of depression, health status, and stressful life events on self-reported memory problems among status, and stressful life-events on self-reported memory problems among aged Blacks. Int J Aging Human Dev 1994; 38:151–162.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Lindenberger U, Baltes PB. Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection. Psychol Aging 1994; 9:339–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Mulrow C, Aguilar C, Endicott J, Velez R, Tuley MR,Charlip WS, et al. Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38(1):45–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Scherer M, Frisina D. Characteristics associated with marginal hearing loss and subjective well-being among a sample of older adults. J Rehabil Res Dev 1998; 35:420–426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Resnick H, Fries B, Vergrugge L. Windows to their world: the effect of sensory impairment on social engagement and activity in nursing home residents. J Gerontol 1997; 528:5135–5144.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Palmore F. Normal aging ii: Reports from the Duke longitudinal studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Butler R. Why Survive? Being Old in America. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Datan N, Ginsberg L. Life Span Developmental Psychology: Normative Life Crises. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Rosow I. Social contact of the aging self. Gerontologist 1973; 13:82–87.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Rosow I. Socialization to Old Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Maas H, Kuypers J. From Thirty to Seventy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Orr J. Aging, catastrophe, and moral reasoning. In: McKee P, ed. Philosophical Foundations of Gerontology. New York: Human Sciences Press, 1982: 243–260.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Wax T. The hearing impaired aged: Double jeopardy or double challenge? Gallaudet Today 1982; 12(2):3–7.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Markides K. Minority aging. In: Riley M, Hess B, Bond K, eds. Aging in Society: Selected review of recent research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983: 115–137.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Calhoun DW, Lipman A. The disabled. In: Palmore ED, ed. Handbook on the Aged in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1984: 311–322.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Goffman F. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Watson WH, Maxwell RJ. Human Aging and Dying: A study in sociocultural gerontology. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Fadiman A. The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down. New York: Noonday Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Schow RL, Balsara NR, Whitcomb CJ, Smedley TC. Aural rehabilitation by ASHA audiologists: 1980–1990. Am J Audiol 1993;2(3):28–37.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Carmen R. Survey of audiologists from an online questionnaire. (Accessed June 5, 2003, at Scholar
  122. 122.
    Prendergast SG, Kelley LA. Aural rehabilitation services: Survey reports who offers which ones and how often. Hear J 2002;55(9):30–35.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Cochlear Implants (Accessed December 12, 2006, at Scholar
  124. 124.
    Kaplan H, Bally S, Brandt F, Busacco D, Pray J. The communication self-assessment scales for older adults (CSOA). J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8(3):203–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Schow R, Nerbonne M. Assessment of hearing handicap by nursing home residents and staff. J Rehabil Audiol 1977;10:2–12.Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Compton-Conley C, Bernstein C. Hearing assistance technology needs assessment profile (HATNAP): A web-based system designed to enable consumers to navigate through their own receptive communication needs assessment. The 3rd International Adult Aural Rehabilitation Conference; 2005 May 9-12; Portland, Maine.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Compton C. Assistive technology for deaf and hard-of-hearing people. In: Alpiner J, McCarthy P, eds. Rehabilitative Audiology: Children and adults. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2002: 501–544.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Compton C. Assistive technology for deaf and hard-of-hearing people. In: Alpiner J, McCarthy P, eds. Rehabilitative Audiology: Children and adults. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1993: 441–468.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Vaughn G, Lightfoot R. ALDS pioneers: Past and present: Part III: ALDS triad-service, education and research. Hear Instr 1987; 38:4–12.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Palmer C, Garstecki D. A computer spreadsheet for locating assistive devices. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1988; 21:158–175.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Ross M. Hearing assistance technology: making a world of difference. Hear J 2004; 57:12–17.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Thibodeau L. Plotting beyond the audiogram to the Telegram, a new assessment tool. Hear J 2004; 57:46–51.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Compton C. Selecting what’s best for the individual. In: Tyler R, Schum D, eds. Assistive Devices for Persons with Hearing Impairment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1995: 224–250.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Dillon H. Hearing Aids. New York: Thieme, 2001.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Bakke MH, Levitt H, Ross M, Erickson F. Large area assistive listening systems (ALS): Review and recommendations: Final report to United States Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access Board). Lexington School for the Deaf/Center for the Deaf, Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Hearing Enhancement. New York, 1999 (Accessed January 8, 2007 at Scholar
  136. 136.
    Dillon H, Lovegrove R. Single-microphone noise reduction systems for hearing aids: a review and an evaluation. In: Studebaker GA, Hochberg I, eds. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1993: 353–372.Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectiveness. Ear Hear 2004;25(4):310–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JN. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 2002; 112:1482–1488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Leal M., Shin Y., Laborde M., Calmels M., Verges S., Lugardon S, et al. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2003; 123(7):826–835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Waltzman S. Cochlear implants and evolving technology. State of the Science Conference on Assisitive Technologies for People with Hearing Loss; 2001 May 11; Graduate Center, City University of New York, NY.Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;63:533–549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Nabelek AK. Communication in noisy and reverberant environments. In: Studebaker GA, Hochberg I, eds. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1993: 15–28.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Stickney G, Zeng F, Litovsky R, Assmann P. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116(2):1081–1091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Lesner S. Candidacy and management of assistive listening devices: special needs of the elderly. Int J Audiol 2003; 42:2S68–2S76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Mann W, Hurren D, Tomita M, Charvat B. The relationship of functional dependence to assistive device use of elderly persons living at home. J Appl Gerontol 1995; 14:225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    National Center for Health Statistics. Current Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1989. Vital and Health Statistics, 10, Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1990.Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Brooks DN. Factors relating to the under-use of postaural hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1985;19(3):211–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Lubinski R. Perspectives on aging and communication. In: Lubinski R, Higginbotham D, eds. Communication Technologies for the Elderly: Vision, Hearing, and Speech. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1997: 1–21.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Riemer-Reiss M, Wacker R. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000; 66:44–59.Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Ross M. Hearing assistive technology training; University of Florida, 2006.Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Surr RK, Schuchman GI, Montgomery AA. Factors influencing use of hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104:732–736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Brooks DN. Hearing aid use and the effects of counseling. Aust J Audiol 1979; 1(1):1–6.Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Smaldino SE, Smaldino JJ. The influence of aural rehabilitation and cognitive style discourse on the perception of hearing handicap. J Am Acad Rehabil Audiol 1988; 21:57–64.Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Abrams HB, Hnath-Chisolm T, Guerreiro SM, Ritterman SI. The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap. Ear Hear 1992;13(5):371–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Kricos PB, Holmes AE. Efficacy of audiologic rehabilitation for older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7(4):219–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Northern J, Meadows-Beyer C. Reducing hearing aid returns through patient education. Audiol Today 1999; 11(2):10–13.Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Hawkins D. Effectiveness of counseling-based adult group aural rehabilitation programs: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16(7):485–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Sweetow R, Henderson-Sabes. The case for LACE (Listening and Communication Enhancement). Hear J 2004; 57(3): 32–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew H. Bakke
    • 1
  • Claire M. Bernstein
  • Scott J. Bally
  • Janet L. Pray
  1. 1.Department of Hearing, Speech and Language Sciences Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center (RERC) on Hearing EnhancementGallaudet UniversityWashington, DC 20002

Personalised recommendations