Advertisement

Selection of Best Product End-of-Life Scenario

Chapter
  • 2.2k Downloads
Part of the Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing book series (SSAM)

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis Product Value Original Equipment Manufacturer Logistics Cost Chemical Engineer Journal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adda S, Dahl T, Gjerstad TB, Lamvik T, Miljeteig G, Molden TH, Schnatmeyer M, Snaddon K (2002) Environmental/social cost/value assessment methodology. WP4 D4.1 (version 2)Google Scholar
  2. Alting L (1993) Designing for a lifetime. Manufacturing Breakthrough. May/June:29–33Google Scholar
  3. Alting L, Zhang H (1991) Trends in the development of the future integrated manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Review 4:1–9Google Scholar
  4. Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F (2003) The environmental performance of alternative solid waste management options: a life-cycle assessment study. Chemical Engineering Journal 96:207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azapagic A (1999) Life-cycle assessment and its application to process selection design and optimization. Chemical Engineering Journal 73:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bufardi A, Sakara D, Gjeorghe R, Kiritsis D, Xirouchakis P (2003) Multiple criteria decision aid for selecting the best product end of life scenario. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 16:526–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bufardi A, Gjeorghe R, Kiritsis D, Xirouchakis P (2004) Multi-criteria decision aid approach for product end-of-life alternative selection. International Journal of Production Research 42:3139–3157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byggeth S, Hochschorner E (2006) Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 14:1420–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Desai A, Mittal A (2003) Evaluation of disassemblability to enable design for disassembly in mass production. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 32:265–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keoleian GA, Kar K (2003) Elucidating complex design and management tradeoffs through life-cycle design: air intake manifold demonstration project. Journal of Cleaner Production 11:61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khan FI, Sadiq R, Husain T (2002) GreenPro-I: a risk-based life-cycle assessment decision-making methodology for process plant design. Environmental Modelling & Software 17:669–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marttunen M, Hamalainen RP (1997) Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment. European Journal of Operational Research 87:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nagel C, Nilsson J, Boks C (1999) European end-of-life systems for electrical and electronic equipment. In: Proc. 1st International Symposium Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, pp 197–202Google Scholar
  14. Sarkis J, Weinrach J (2001) Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate environmentally conscious waste treatment technology. Journal of Cleaner Production 9:417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sohlenius G (1989) Needs and possibilities for sciences of manufacturing technology. In: Proc. 21st CIRP Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  16. Zussman E, Kriwet A, Seliger G (1994) Disassembly-oriented assessment methodology to support design for recycling. CIRP Annals 43:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Personalised recommendations