Advertisement

Introduction to Multiple Attribute Decision-making (MADM) Methods

Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing book series (SSAM)

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process Decision Table Compromise Solution Analytic Hierarchy Process Method VIKOR Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barzilai J, Lootsma FA (1994) Power relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Symposium on the AHP, George Washington University, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Belton V, Gear T (1983) On a short-coming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11:228–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen CT (2000) Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114:1–9zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making-methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Csáki P, Rapcsák T, Turchányi P, Vermes M (1995) Research and development for group decision aid in Hungary by WINGDSS, a Microsoft Windows based group decision support system. Decision Support Systems 14:205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng H, Yeh CH, Willis RJ (2000) Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research 27: 963–973zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dyer RF, Forman EH (1992) Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Support Systems 8:99–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards W, Newman JR, Snapper K, Seaver D (1982) Multiattribute Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  9. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2004) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Fishburn PC (1967) Additive utilities with incomplete product set: applications to priorities and assignments. Operations Research Society of America, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  11. Forman E, Penewati K (1998) Aggregating individual judgements and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 108:165–169zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gal T (1999) Multicriteria decision making:advances in MCDM models algorithms, theory and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Hwang CL, Yoon KP (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaganathan S, Erinjeri JJ, Ker JI (2006) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology doi:10.1007/s00170-006-0446-1Google Scholar
  15. Kwiesielewicz M, Uden EV (2004) Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the AHP. Computers & Operations Research 31:713–719zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lai VS, Bo KW, Cheung W (2002) Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: a case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal of Operational Research 137:134–144zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lai YJ, Liu TY, Hwang CL (1994) TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research 76:486–500zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lootsma FA (1999) Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgement. Applied Optimization Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller DW, Starr MK (1969) Executive decisions with operations research. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson DL (1996) Decision aids for selection problems. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2002) Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 17:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2003) Fuzzy multicriteria model for post-earthquake land-use planning. Natural Hazards Review 4:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 156:445–455zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research 178:514–529zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Saaty TL (2000) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the AHP. RWS Publications, PittsburgGoogle Scholar
  27. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1947) The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  28. Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Triantaphyllou E and Sanchez (1997) A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods. Decision Sciences 28:151–194Google Scholar
  30. Tzeng GH, Tsaur SH, Laiw YD, Opricovic S (2002) Multicriteria analysis of environmental quality in Taipei:public preferences and improvement strategies. Journal of Environmental Management 65:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tzeng GH, Teng MH, Chen JJ, Opricovic S (2002) Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei. International Journal of Hospitality Management 21:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tzeng GH, Lin CW, Opricovic S (2005) Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy 33:1373–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  34. Yu PL (1973) A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science 19:936–946CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Zanakis S, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: a comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107:507–529zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zeleny M (1982) Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Personalised recommendations