Managing Change and Reconfigurations of CNC Machine Tools

  • R. Hedrick
  • R. J. Urbanic
Part of the Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing book series (SSAM)


Several factors must be considered to effectively manage process change. However, when changing or reconfiguring a system, care should be taken to assure that the changes minimize deviations from the original manufacturing process plans in a controlled manner. The new system configuration should utilize much of the original programs, tooling, fixturing, material handling, and inspection equipment in order to minimize the chances of introducing new quality or logistics issues. A systematic, spreadsheet based methodology for assessing configurations or reconfigurations for CNC machine tools is presented. This methodology can be used in the initial planning stages, or when a change is introduced into the system. Heuristics are utilized that consider the physical and functional characteristics to determine a candidate machine’s suitability. The application of this methodology is demonstrated using practical examples.


Tool Path Compatibility State Spindle Speed Kinematic Chain Machine Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bruccoleri, M., Pasek, Z., Koren, Y (2006) Operation management in reconfigurable manufac-turing systems: Reconfiguration for error handling. Int. J. Production Economics 100: 87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ElMaraghy H.A., 2005, Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Special Issue on Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems 17:261--276Google Scholar
  3. Hedrick B., Urbanic R.J., ElMaraghy H.A., 2004, Multi-tasking machine tools and their impact on process planning. CIRP 2004 Int. Design Conference, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  4. Katz R (2007) Design principles of reconfigurable machines. Int J Adv Manuf Technology. 34: 430–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lei W (2005) Dynamic reconfigurable machine tool controller. PhD dissertation, Brigham Young UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Shabaka, AI, ElMaraghy HA (2007) Generation of Machine Configurations based on Product Features. Special Issue of the IJCIM). 24/4:355 – 369Google Scholar
  7. Skinner W., 1978, Manufacturing in the Corporate Strategy. John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
  8. Wiendahl H.-.P, Heger C.L., 2003, Justifying changeability: A~methodical approach to achieving cost effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the CIRP 2nd International Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  9. Youssef AMA, ElMaraghy HA (2006) Assessment of manufacturing systems reconfiguration smoothness. Int J Ad Manuf Technol (IJAMT), 30:174-193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Hedrick
    • 1
  • R. J. Urbanic
    • 2
  1. 1.CAM Multi-TaskingMasterCam Canada Inc.LaSalleCanada
  2. 2.Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Systems Engineering (IMSE)University of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations