Tasks of Truth-Theories

  • Jan WoleńskiEmail author
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 45)


This chapter concentrates on problems discussed in truth theories, namely truth-bearers, the question whether the concept of truth belongs to ontology, epistemology or axiology, the definability of truth, truth-criteria, formal properties of the division of truth-bearers into truths and falsehoods, truth and logic, relations between the concept of truth and other philosophical notions, the applicability of the concept of truth to common sense, science, art, religion, morality, etc.


  1. Ajdukiewicz, K. (1949). Zagadnienia i kierunki filozofii. Warszawa: Czytelnik; Eng. tr. Problems & Theories of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Albuquerque, D. (1995). Truth and Action in Speech acts. A Study on J. L. Austin’s Essay on Truth. New Delhi: Intercultural Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Auxier, R. E., Hahn, L. E. (Eds.) (2006). The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. La Salle: Open CourtGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, T. (1991). Can there be a substantive account of truth? In Cooper, Engel (1991), 22–39.Google Scholar
  5. Bennet, B. M., Hoffman, D. D., Prakash, Ch. (1989). Observer Mechanics. A Formal Theory of Perception. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beziau, J.-Y., Carnielli, W., Gabbay, D. (2007). Handbook of Paraconsistency. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Blackburn, S., Simmons, K. (Eds.) (1999). Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and Necessity. A Study in Semantics of Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2nd ed., 1956.Google Scholar
  9. Cartwright, E. (1987). Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cartwright, R. (1987a). A neglected theory of truth. In Cartwright (1987), 71–93.Google Scholar
  11. Changeux, J.-P. (2002). Physiology of Truth. Neuroscience and Human Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, N., Engel, P. (Eds.) (1991). New Inquiries into Meaning and Truth. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  13. David, M. (2004). Theories of truth. In Niiniluoto, Sintonen, Woleński, 331–414.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, D. (1996). The folly to trying to define truth. Dialogue and Universalism, 6, 39–53.Google Scholar
  15. Dumitriu, M., Sandu, G. (Eds.) (2013). Truth. Bucureşti: Editura Universitãtii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
  16. Dummett, M. (1999). Of what kind of things Is truth a property? In Blackburn, Simmons (1999), 264–281.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, D. (2018). The Metaphysics of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Engel, P. (1991). The Norm of Truth: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gaskin, R. (2013). Language, Truth, and Literature. A Defence of Literary Humanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Glanzberg, M. (Ed.) (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haack, S. (1978). Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halbach, V. (2011). Axiomatic Theories of Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halbach, V., Horsten, L. (Eds.) (2002). Principles of Truth. Frankfurt am Main: Dr. Hänsel-Hohenhausen.Google Scholar
  24. Halldén, S. (1960). True Love, True Humour and True Religion. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
  25. Hempel, K. (1935). On the logical positivistic theory of truth. Analysis, 2, 49–55; repr. in Horwich (1994), 80–89.Google Scholar
  26. Hofstadter, A. (1965). Truth and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Horwich, P. (Ed.) (1994). Theories of Truth. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  28. Huby, P., Neal, G. (Eds.) (1989). The Criterion of Truth. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jago, M. (2018). What is Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, E. L. (1992). Focusing on Truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Kastil, A. (1947). Wahrheit und Sein. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, I, 483–498.Google Scholar
  32. Kirkham, R. L. (1992). Theories of Truth. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kolak, D., Symons, J. (Eds.) (2004). Quantifiers, Questions and Quantum Mechanics. Dodrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Künne, W. (1985). Wahrheit. In Martens, Schnädelbach (1985), 116–171.Google Scholar
  35. Künne, W. (2003). Conceptions of Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Linke, P. (1949). Die mehrwertige Logiken und Wahrheitsproblem. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, III, 378–398, 530–546.Google Scholar
  37. Malinowski, G. (1994). Many-Valued Logics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Marsonet, M., Benzi, M. (Eds.) (2004). The Proceedings of Genoa Conference on Logic and Metaphysics. Name: Fiesola.Google Scholar
  39. Martens, E., Schnädelbach, H. (1985). Philosophie. Ein Grundkurs. Reimbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  40. McCloskey, H. J. (1969). Meta-Metaethics and Normative Ethics. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moore, G. E. (1899). The nature of judgement. Mind, 5, 176–193; repr. in G. E. Moore (1993), 1–19.Google Scholar
  42. Moore, G. E. (1993). Selected Writings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Niiniluoto, I., Sintonen, M., Woleński, J. (Eds.) (2004). Handbook of Epistemology. Dodrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  44. Patterson, D. M. (1999). Law and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Popper, K. (1955). A note on Tarski’s definition of truth. Mind, 64, 388–391; rept. Popper (1972), 335–340.Google Scholar
  46. Popper, K. (1972). Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press (repr. with additions, 1974).Google Scholar
  47. Priest, G. (2008). An Introduction to Non-Classical logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Puntel, L. B. (1990). Grundlagen einer Thorie der Wahrheit. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ray, G. (2018). Tarski on the concept of truth. In Glanzberg (2018), 695–719.Google Scholar
  50. Rescher, N. (1969). Many-Valued Logic. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  51. Ritter, J., Gründer, K. H., Gabriel, G. (Eds.) (1971–2007), Historischer Wörterbuch der Philosohischen Begriffen, v. 1–13. Darmstadt: Wissenschafliche Buchgessellschaft.Google Scholar
  52. Russell, B. (1903). The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sher, G. (1999). On the possibility of a substantive theory of truth. Synthese, 117, 133–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soames, S. (1999). Understanding Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tarski, A. (1933). Pojęcie prawdy w językach nauk dedukcyjnych (The Concept of Truth in Languages of Deductive Sciences). Warszawa: Towarzystwo Naukowe Warszawskie; Germ. tr. (with additions) as Tarski (1935).Google Scholar
  56. Tarski, A. (1935). Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen. Studia Philosophica, 1, 261–405; repr. in A. Tarski (1986), v. 2, 51–198; Eng. tr., The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages, in Tarski (1956), 152–278 (page-references Tarski (1933)).Google Scholar
  57. Tarski, A. (1956). Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Papers of 1923 to 1938 (tr. by J. H. Woodger,). Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2nd ed., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company 1983.Google Scholar
  58. Tarski, A. (1986). Collected Papers, v. 1–4. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2nd ed., 2018.Google Scholar
  59. Turner, R. (1990). Truth and Modality for Knowledge Representation. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  60. Turner, R. (1999). Logics of truth. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 31, 308–329.Google Scholar
  61. Twardowski, K. (1900). O tzw. prawdach względnych (On so-called relative truths). In Księga Pamiątkowa Uniweysytetu Lwowskiego ku uczczeniu pięćsetnej rocznicy Fundacji Jagiellońskiej Uniwersytetu Krakowskiego (Memorial Book of Lvov University on the Occasion of 500thAnniversary of Jagiellonian Fund—The University of Kraków), 64–93. Lwów: Nakładem Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego, 64–93; Eng. tr. in Twardowski (1999), 147–169.Google Scholar
  62. Twardowski, K. (1912). O czynnościach i wytworach. Kilka uwag z pogranicza psychologii, gramatyki i logiki (Actions and products. remarks from the boderline of psychology, grammar and logic). In Księga Pamiątkowo ku uczczeniu 250-tej rocznicy założenia Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego przez króla Jana Kazimierza (Memorial Book on the Occasion of Establishment of Lvov University by the King Jan Kazimierz), v. II. Lwów: Nakładem Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego, 1–33; Eng. tr. in Twardowski (1999), 103–132.Google Scholar
  63. Twardowski, K. (1999). On Actions, Products and Other Topics in Philosophy (A. Szylewicz, Trans.). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  64. Van Fraassen, B. (1971). Formal Semantics and Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  65. Van Zantwijk, T., Gabriel G. (2001). Urteil. In Ritter, Gründer, Gabriel (Eds.) (1971–2007), v. XI, 430–458.Google Scholar
  66. Von Wright, G. H. (1996). Six Essays in Philosophical Logic. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.Google Scholar
  67. Von Wright, G. H. (1996a). Truth logics. In Von Wright (1996), 71–91.Google Scholar
  68. Vroom, H. M. (1989). Religions and Truth: Philosophical Reflections. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  69. Wansing, H., Shramko Y. (2011). Truth and Falsehood: An Inquiry into Generalized Logical Values. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Weaver, N. (2015). Truth & Assertibility. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weingartner, P. (2000). Basic Questions on Truth. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wentscher, E. (1941). Relative oder absolute Wahrheit? Eine Studie. München: Reinhardt.Google Scholar
  73. Williams, B. (2004). Truth and Truthfulness. An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Williams, C. J. F. (1976). What is Truth? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Woleński, J. (1989). Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw Lchool. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  76. Woleński, J. (1995). Logic and falsity. Logica Yearbook 1994, 95–105.Google Scholar
  77. Woleński, J. (2004b). On some formal properties of truth. In Kolak, Symons (2004), 195–207; repr. in Woleński (2011), 91–100.Google Scholar
  78. Woleński, J. (2004c). What are truth-bearers? Reports on Philosophy, 22, 34–47; repr. in Woleński (2011), 145–154.Google Scholar
  79. Woleński, J. (2004d). Is Truth an ontological concept? In Marsonet, Benzi (2004), 133–139.Google Scholar
  80. Woleński, J. (2006). A generalization of Hume’s thesis. Logica Yearbook 2005, 215–223; repr. in Woleński (2011), 155–162.Google Scholar
  81. Woleński, J. (2006a). Tarskian and post–Tarskian truth. In Auxier, Hahn (2006), 647–672: repr. in Woleński (2011), 163–182.Google Scholar
  82. Woleński, J. (2007). Applications of squares of opposition and their generalizations in philosophical analysis. Logica Universalis, 2(1), 13–29; repr. Woleński (2011), 255–269.Google Scholar
  83. Woleński, J. (2011). Essays on Logic and Its Applications in Philosophy. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  84. Woleński, J. (2013). Ens et verum convertuntur? (Are being and truth convertible. A contermporary perspective)? In Dumitriu, Sandu (2013), 75–83; repr. in Woleński (2018), 107–114.Google Scholar
  85. Woleński, J. (2014a). An abstract approach to bivalence. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 23(1), 3–14; repr. in Woleński (2018), 115–124.Google Scholar
  86. Woleński, J. (2018). Logic and its Philosophy. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  87. Woods, J. (2018). Truth in Fiction. Rethinking Its Logic. Springer: Berlin.Google Scholar
  88. Zinoviev, A. A. (1963). Philosophical Problems of Many-Valued Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jagiellonian University (prof. emeritus)KrakówPoland
  2. 2.University of Information, Technology and ManagementRzeszowPoland

Personalised recommendations