Advertisement

The Phenomenology of Experiencing Oneself Online: Critical Dimensions of Identity and Language Use in Virtual Spaces

  • Liudmila KlimanovaEmail author
Chapter
  • 60 Downloads
Part of the New Language Learning and Teaching Environments book series (NLLTE)

Abstract

The emerging arrays of online environments readily accessible constitute primary settings through which routine constructions of identity are curated through the use of second language (L2) as a tool of social interaction and self-identification in virtual networks. Little is known, however, about the effects of such virtual experiences on the learners’ perception of themselves as L2 speakers. This lack of research attention to the psychological contexts of such experiences has resulted in a paucity of knowledge about what motivates L2 learners to construct and negotiate their speaker positions in virtual social spaces. This chapter proposes to conceptualize virtual social experience in phenomenological terms; that is, as a subjectively lived life moment that carries personal meaning and significance for further individual development.

References

  1. Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter, J. (2016). Positioning language and identity. Poststructuralist perspectives. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 34–49). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Darvin, D. (2016). Language and identity in the digital age. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 523–540). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Domingo, M. (2016). Language and identity research in online environments a multimodal ethnographic perspective. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 541–557). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Salmon, P. (1994). “Grids are all very well, but …” Preston, Lancashire: EPCA European Personal Construct Association Newsletter 1994, 2.Google Scholar
  14. Salmon, P. (1995). Psychology in the classroom: Reconstructing teachers and learners. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  15. Salmon, P. (2003). A psychology for teachers. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook of personal construct psychology. Chester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, J. A. (2010). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Existential Analysis, 21(2), 186–192.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Theory, method and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology. A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed., pp. 53–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Thorne, S., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities, and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures of use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
  21. Thorne, S. L. (2016). Cultures-of-use and morphologies of communicative action. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 185–191.Google Scholar
  22. Thorne, S. L., & Black, R. W. (2011). Identity and interaction in internet-mediated contexts. In C. Higgins (Ed.), Identity formation in globalizing contexts (pp. 257–278). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations