Development of Chosen Social and Economic Indicators of Using Raw Materials in the Context of Sustainability in Slovakia

  • Katarina CulkovaEmail author
  • Andrea Rosova
  • Michal Cehlar
  • Henrieta Pavolova
Conference paper
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)


One of the most important tasks in the future should be increasing the processing level and products’ finalization on the base of raw materials, since they have an impact on the economic growth. The goal of the contribution is to search for the development of social and economic indicators, influencing the usage of raw materials from the viewpoint of sustainability of the Slovakian industry. By the indicators, we analyzed mining in the individual regions of Slovakia through an analysis of the macro environment. The analysis showed that employment in the mining organizations recorded a decreasing trend, whereas the investment in Slovakia influenced sustainability positively. Value added and the gross domestic product (GDP) in the mining sector recorded a fluctuating tendency. Results confirm that the usage of raw materials is characterized by positive impacts on the social and economic area of sustainable development in Slovakia. The results can serve as the basis for the management of mining organizations towards sustainability, which will demand research of other indicators in all regions and industries, contributing to the national economy.


Raw material base Resource policy Economic and social indicators Gross domestic products Employment Export Import Slovakia 



The contribution presents partial results of project solving VEGA No. 1/0515/18, VEGA No. 1/0651/2019 and KEGA 006TUKE-4/2019.


  1. 1.
    Ciruelos, J., & Duchene, M. (1983). Modele sur micro-ordinateur pour l’analyse de la faisabilite financiere d’un project minier. Industrie Minérale – Les techniquies.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zuberec, J., Tréger, M., Lexa, J., & Baláž, P. (2005). Raw material of Slovakia. ŠGÚ DŠ, Bratislava, 351 p.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cehlár, M., & Maras, M. (2001). Economic evaluation of mining projects. TU, FBERG, Košice.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Merciu, G. L., Merciu, F. C., & Cercleux, A. L. (2016). The assessment of social and economic impacts associated to an abandoned mining site. Case study: Ciudanovita (Romania). International Conference – Environment at a Crossroads: SMART approaches for a sustainable future. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 32, 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rybár, P., Cehlár, M., Engel, J., & Mihok, J. (2005). Evaluation of mineral deposits. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 1, 136.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Švarda, T. Sustainable development as possible medicament for problems (in Slovak). Available at:
  7. 7.
    Peter, B. (2013). Perspective of domestic energetic raw materials using (in Slovak). ŠGÚ DŠ. Mineralia Slovaca, 45, 225–232.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arshad, A., Zakaria, M., & Junyang, X. (2016). Energy prices and economic growth in Pakistan: A macro-economic analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews., 55, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown, S. P. A., & Yücel, M. K. (2002). Energy prices and aggregate economic activity: An interpretative survey. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42(2), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cunado, J., & Perez de Gracia, F. (2005). Oil prices, economic activity and inflation: Evidence for some Asian countries. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 45(1), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Falck, W. E. (2016). Social licencing in mining – Between ethical dilemmas and economic risk management. Mineral Economics, 29, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bebbington, A., Hinojosa, L., Bebbington, D. H., Burneo, M. L., & Warnaars, X. (2008). Contention and ambiguity: Mining and the possibilities of development. Development and Change, 39(6), 887–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, D., Yang, X., Tian, X., Wu, R., & Wang, L. (2011). Study on integrated simulation model of economic, energy and environment safety system under the low-carbon policy in Beijing. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 5, 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ur Rehman, S. A., Cai, Y., Mirjat, N. H., Walasai, G. D., & Nafees, M. (2019). Energy-environment-economy nexus in Pakistan: Lessons from a PAK-TIMES model. Energy Policy, 1, 200–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mathu, K., & Chinomona, R. (2013). South African coal mining industry: Socio-economic attributes. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 347–358.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Klinda, J., & Lieskovská, Z. (2011). Report on state of living environment in Slovakia in 2010 (in Slovak). MŽP SR, SAŽP SR.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    HBU SR: Annual report of activity of mining office in SR in 2018. Available at:
  19. 19.
    Statistic office of Slovakia. (2017). Available at:
  20. 20.
    NBS, SR: Inward FDI financial flows. (2018). Available at:
  21. 21.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katarina Culkova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrea Rosova
    • 2
  • Michal Cehlar
    • 1
  • Henrieta Pavolova
    • 3
  1. 1.Technical University Košice, FBERG, Institute of Earth SourcesKošiceSlovakia
  2. 2.Technical University Košice, FBERG, Institute of LogisticsKošiceSlovakia
  3. 3.Technical University KošiceKošiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations