Advertisement

Caries Risk Assessment

  • Svante TwetmanEmail author
  • Avijit Banerjee
Chapter
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Caries risk/susceptibility assessment (CRA) is regarded as a cornerstone for clinical decision-making and disease management. Although CRA is implicit in routine patient care, its formal, objective and recorded implementation in everyday practice seems less common. The aim of this chapter is to review the science and evidence behind the CRA process for use in general oral healthcare practice. It is concluded that the beneficial effects of CRA clearly outweigh harm and can therefore be strongly recommended. There is however no specific method with perfect accuracy and no conclusive research evidence to support the use of one CRA tool, model or technology over another. Multivariate models tend to display an improved accuracy over those using single predictors. The ability to predict future caries is greater among pre-school and school children than later in life, with an accuracy that can exceed 80%. Validated tools for root caries prediction are lacking. There is emerging evidence that interventions based on CRA can increase patient behavioural adherence and reduce the onset of new carious lesions. Thus, the adoption of a formal method may offer more appropriate treatments, more effective utilization of resource and possibly strengthen a case from a medico-legal perspective. Further research is needed, in particular on the health-economic impact of CRA and its value for patients, oral health care providers and other stakeholders.

Notes

Competing Interests

The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94:650–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, Ekstrand K, Weintraub JA, Ramos-Gomez F, Tagami J, Twetman S, Tsakos G, Ismail A. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Twetman S, Fontana M, Featherstone JD. Risk assessment—can we achieve consensus? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41:e64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Twetman S. Caries risk assessment in children: how accurate are we? Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016;17:27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ismail AI, Tellez M, Pitts NB, Ekstrand KR, Ricketts D, Longbottom C, Eggertsson H, Deery C, Fisher J, Young DA, Featherstone JD, Evans W, Zeller GG, Zero D, Martignon S, Fontana M, Zandona A. Caries management pathways preserve dental tissues and promote oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41:e12–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Yokoyama Y, Riley JL, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV. Dentists’ decisions to conduct caries risk assessment in a Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015;43:128–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Caries risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents. In: Reference manual 2015-2016, vol. 37. Chicago: AAPD; 2015. p. 132–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaffee BW, Cheng J, Featherstone JDB. Baseline caries risk assessment as predictor of caries incidence. J Dent. 2015;43:518–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    MacRitchie HM, Longbottom C, Robertson M, Nugent Z, Chan K, Radford JR, Pitts NB. Development of the Dundee caries risk assessment model (DCRAM)--risk model development using a novel application of CHAID analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012;40(1):37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bratthall D, Hänsel Petersson G. Cariogram–a multifactorial risk assessment model for a multifactorial disease. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005;33:256–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gao XL, Lo EC, Chu CH, Hsu SC. Caries risk assessment programmes for Hong Kong children. Hong Kong Med J. 2015;21(Suppl 6):42–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Busby M, Chapple E, Matthews R, Chapple IL. Practitioner evaluation of a novel online integrated oral health and risk assessment tool: a practice pilot. Br Dent J. 2013;215:115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Banerjee A, Watson TF. Pickard’s guide to minimally invasive operative dentistry. 10th ed. Oxford: OUP; 2015.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doméjean S, Banerjee A. Assessing the risk of developing carious lesions in root surfaces. Monogr Oral Sci. 2017;26:55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayes M, Da Mata C, McKenna G, Burke FM, Allen PF. Evaluation of the Cariogram for root caries prediction. J Dent. 2017;62:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Senneby A, Mejàre I, Sahlin NE, Svensäter G, Rohlin M. Diagnostic accuracy of different caries risk assessment methods. A systematic review. J Dent. 2015;43:1385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mejàre I, Axelsson S, Dahlén G, Espelid I, Norlund A, Tranæus S, Twetman S. Caries risk assessment. A systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72:81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Doméjean S, Banerjee A, Featherstone JDB. Caries risk/susceptibility assessment: its value in minimum intervention oral healthcare. Br Dent J. 2017;223:191–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chaffee BW, Featherstone JDB, Gansky SA, Cheng J, Zhan L. Caries risk assessment item importance: risk designation and caries status in children under age 6. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2016;1:131–42.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Featherstone JDB, Chaffee BW. The evidence for caries management by risk assessment (CAMBRA®). Adv Dent Res. 2018;29:9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riley JL, Qvist V, Fellows JL, Rindal DB, Richman JS, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, DPBRN Collaborative Group. Dentists’ use of caries risk assessment in children: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Gen Dent. 2010;58:230–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Riley JL, Gordan VV, Ajmo CT, Bockman H, Jackson MB, Gilbert GH. Dentists’ use of caries risk assessment and individualized caries prevention for their adult patients: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Tex Dent J. 2015;132:18–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hänsel Petersson G, Ericson E, Twetman S. Preventive care delivered within public dental service after caries risk assessment of young adults. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016;14:215–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hart JT. The inverse care law. Lancet. 1971;1(7696):405–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng J, Chaffee BW, Cheng NF, Gansky SA, Featherstone JD. Understanding treatment effect mechanisms of the CAMBRA randomized trial in reducing caries increment. J Dent Res. 2015;94:44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Evans RW, Clark P, Jia N. The caries management system: are preventive effects sustained postclinical trial? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016;44:188–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arino M, Ataru I, Fujiki S, Sugiyama S, Hayashi M. Multicenter study on caries risk assessment in Japanese adult patients. J Dent. 2015;43:1223–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rechmann P, Chaffee BW, Rechmann BMT, Featherstone JDB. Changes in caries risk in a practice-based trial. Adv Dent Res. 2018;29:15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hänsel Petersson G, Isberg P-E, Twetman S. Caries risk profiles in schoolchildren over 2 years assessed by cardiogram. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20:341–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Afuakwah C, Welbury R. Why do you need to use a caries risk assessment protocol to provide an effective caries preventive regime? Prim Dent J. 2015;4:56–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hattne K, Folke S, Twetman S. Attitudes to oral health among adolescents with high caries risk. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007;65:206–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behavior change wheel: a new method for characterizing and designing behavior change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Asimakopoulou K, Newton JT. The contributions of behaviour change science towards dental public health practice: a new paradigm. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015;43:2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Petersson GH, Twetman S. Relationship between risk assessment and payment models in Swedish Public Dental Service: a prospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1049–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Conservative and MI Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations