Advertisement

Assessing Universities’ Global Reporting Initiative G4 Sustainability Reports in Concurrence with Stakeholder Inclusiveness

  • Judith FreiEmail author
  • Melanie Lubinger
  • Dorothea Greiling
Chapter
  • 38 Downloads
Part of the Public Sector Financial Management book series (PUSEFIMA)

Abstract

The chapter provides an insight into stakeholder engagement (SE) processes of universities’ Sustainability Reports (SRs) and analyses the extent to which universities comply with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Guidelines.

After introducing strategic stakeholder theory and neo-institutionalism for identifying arguments for an interpretation of the findings, the results of a systematic literature review are presented.

The empirical findings are based on the recent G4 SRs worldwide and show that universities document their main stakeholders and main communication topics. However, the importance of the identified topics is not mirrored in the GRI coverage rates.

This is a clear sign that SRs of universities are far from comprehensive stakeholder accountability. The reporting behaviour is more in line with the expectations of neo-institutionalism than with strategic stakeholder theory.

Keywords

Sustainability reporting Universities Global Reporting Initiative Stakeholder engagement 

References

  1. Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., Marimon, F., & Casani, F. (2015). Diffusion of Sustainability Reporting in Universities: Current Situation and Future Perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106(12), 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, M. (2010). Re-conceiving Managerial Capture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 847–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bebbington, J., Higgins, C., & Frame, B. (2009). Initiating Sustainable Development Reporting: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(4), 588–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bice, S., & Coates, H. (2016). University Sustainability Reporting: Taking Stock of Transparency. Tertiary Education and Management, 22(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco-Portela, N., Benayas, J., Pertierra, L. R., & Lozano, R. (2017). Towards the Integration of Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: A Review of Drivers of and Barriers to Organizational Change and Their Comparison Against Those Found of Companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 563–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brusca, I., Labrador, M., & Larran, M. (2018). The Challenge of Sustainability and Integrated Reporting at Universities: A Case Study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burrell, N. E., & Roberts, R. E. (2014). The Public Interest Imperative in Corporate Sustainability Reporting Research. Accounting and The Public Interest, 14, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability Accounting and Reporting: Fad or Trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceulemans, K., Lozano, R., & Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M. (2015). Sustainability Reporting in Higher Education: Interconnecting the Reporting Process and Organisational Change Management for Sustainability. Sustainability, 7(7), 8881–8903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized Hypocrisy, Organizational Façades, and Sustainability Reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dagilienė, L., & Mykolaitienė, V. (2016). Sustainability Reporting in the Higher Education Sector – Case Study of Lithuania. ZögU/Journal for Public and Nonprofit Services, 39(1–2), 163–174.Google Scholar
  12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 63–82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U. M., & Leal Filho, W. (2015). Sustainable Universities – A Study of Critical Success Factors for Participatory Approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., & Bellés-Colomer, L. (2017). Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Reporting in Higher Education, an Analysis of Key Internal Stakeholders’ Expectations. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(2), 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fonseca, A., Macdonald, A., Dandy, E., & Valenti, P. (2011). The State of Sustainability Reporting at Canadian Universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Pramar, P. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gamage, P., & Sciulli, N. (2017). Sustainability Reporting by Australian Universities. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Global Reporting Initiative GRI. (2013). G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org/. Accessed 9 Jan 2019.
  20. Gray, R. (2010). Is Accounting for Sustainability Actually Accounting for Sustainability and How Would We Know? An Exploration of Narratives of Organisations and the Planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2008). GRI Sustainability Reporting by Australian Public Sector Organizations. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for Stakeholders, Stakeholder Utility Function and Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Higgins, C., & Larrinaga, C. (2014). Sustainability Reporting. Insights from Institutional Theory. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (pp. 273–289). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hinson, R., Gyabea, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Sustainability Reporting Among Ghanaian Universities. Communication, 41(1), 22–42.Google Scholar
  25. Hopwood, A. G. (2009). Accounting and the Environment. Accounting, Organization and Society, 34(3), 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. James, M. L. (2015). The Benefits of Sustainability and Integrated Reporting: An Investigation of Accounting Majors’ Perceptions. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 18(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  27. Larrán, M. J., López Hernández, A., & Calzado Cejas, M. Y. (2012). Stakeholder Expectations in Spanish Public Universities: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(10), 1–13.Google Scholar
  28. Larrán, M. J., Madueño, J. H., Calzado, Y., & Andrades, J. (2016). A Proposal for Measuring Sustainability in Universities: A Case Study of Spain. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(5), 671–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Larrán, M. J., Peña, F. J. A., & Madueño, J. H. (2019). An Analysis of University Sustainability Reports from the GRI Database: An Examination of Influential Variables. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(6), 1019–1044.Google Scholar
  30. Lopatta, K., & Jaeschke, R. (2014). Sustainability Reporting at German and Austrian Universities. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 5(1), 66–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lozano, R. (2006). A Tool for a Graphical Assessment of Sustainability in Universities (GASU). Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 963–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lozano, R. (2011). The State of Sustainability Reporting in Universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lozano, R., Llobet, J., & Tideswell, G. (2013). The Process of Assessing and Reporting Sustainability at Universities: Preparing the Report of the University of Leeds. Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Sostenibilidad y Humanismo, 8, 85–112.Google Scholar
  34. Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., & Hugé, J. (2015). A Review of Commitment and Implementation of Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Results from a Worldwide Survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lucas, L. (2006). The Research Game in Academic Life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mainardes, E., Raposo, M., & Alves, H. (2012). Public University Students’ Expectations: An Empirical Study Based on the Stakeholders Theory. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 8(35), 173–196.Google Scholar
  37. Malik, M. (2015). Value-Enhancing Capabilities of CSR: A Brief Review of Contemporary Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manetti, G., & Toccafondi, S. (2014). Defining the Content of Sustainability Reports in Nonprofit Organizations: Do Stakeholders Really Matter? Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 26(1), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ntim, C. G., Soobaroyon, T., & Broad, M. J. (2017). Governance Structures Voluntary Disclosures and Public Accountability: The Case of UK Higher Education Organisations. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(1), 65–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker, L. (2011). University Corporatization: Driving Redefinition. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(3), 434–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ralph, M., & Stubbs, W. (2014). Integrating Environmental Sustainability into Universities. Higher Education, 67(1), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Romolini, A., Fissi, S., & Gori, E. (2015). Quality Disclosure in Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Universities. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science, 11(44), 196–218.Google Scholar
  43. Sassen, R., & Azizi, L. (2018a). Voluntary Disclosure of Sustainability Reports by Canadian Universities. Journal of Business Economics, 88(1), 97–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sassen, R., & Azizi, L. (2018b). Assessing Sustainability Reports of US Universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(7), 1158–1184.Google Scholar
  45. Sassen, R., Dienes, D., & Beth, C. (2014). Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung deutscher Hochschulen. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik & Umweltrecht, 37(3), 258–277.Google Scholar
  46. Secundo, G., Dumay, J., Schiuma, G., & Passiante, G. (2016). Managing Intellectual Capital Through a Collective Intelligence Approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shabana, K. M., Buchholtz, A. K., & Carroll, A. B. (2017). The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Business & Society, 56(8), 107–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Siboni, B., Del Sordo, C., & Pazzi, S. (2013). Sustainability Reporting in State Universities: An Investigation of Italian Pioneering Practices. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 4(2), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Veltri, S., & Silvestri, A. (2015). The Free State University Integrated Reporting: A Critical Consideration. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(2), 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zorio-Grima, A., Sierra-Gracía, L., & Garcia-Benau, M. A. (2018). Sustainability Reporting Experience by Universities: A Causal Configuration Approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(2), 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith Frei
    • 1
    Email author
  • Melanie Lubinger
    • 1
  • Dorothea Greiling
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Management AccountingJohannes Kepler UniversityLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations