Advertisement

Background and Research Challenges for FC for Healthcare 4.0

  • Shivangi Surati
  • Sanjay Patel
  • Keyur Surati
Chapter
  • 17 Downloads
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)

Abstract

The revolution in the healthcare domain was originated with the emergence of modular IT system in healthcare (Health 1.0) to the healthcare extension of Industry 4.0 (Health 4.0) integrated with Internet of Things (IoT), Cyber Physical Systems, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Cloud Computing, Big Data, Bioinformatics, Robotics, Precision Medicine, to cite a few. Applying IoT in healthcare 4.0, massive amount of patients’ data is generated by the sensors and this data is accessible to the doctors at any time and at any place for analysis and for appropriate line of treatment. The sensors in the healthcare domain of IoT need to be wearable and wireless to monitor the patients on large scale. In addition, the analysis of data and decision of treatment should be done and communicated in as little amount of time as possible. Thus, the aggregation, storage, analysis, and maintenance of data should be such that the data is continuously available, portable, consistent, accurate, scalable, secure, and quickly transferable. These challenges constraint the energy, memory, communication, and processing capacity of the end devices (sensors) used. Hence, instead of relying entirely on remote data centers using Cloud computing, the gap is bridged by means of fog computing (near the healthcare premises). The factors affecting the architecture of fog computing in healthcare domain are location of patient, latency requirements, geographic distribution, heterogeneous data, scalability, real-time vs batch processing, mobility of end devices, etc. On the other side, use of fog computing in the healthcare has substantial challenges for researchers and organizations including application-oriented architecture prototype, modeling and deployment, infrastructure and network management, resource management, mobility of patients and hence data mobility, security and privacy of patients’ data, scalability, easy incorporation of various healthcare professionals’ proficiency with intelligent devices and sensors, and minimum latency time in case of life threatening situations. This chapter discusses background and research challenges of fog computing in Healthcare 4.0 with an aim to guide the researchers and stakeholders for the overall improvement in the functioning of the healthcare domain.

Keywords

Healthcare Cyber physical systems (CPS) Fog computing Wearable sensors Medical databases Internet of Things Healthcare 4.0 Fog node 

References

  1. 1.
    Silva, A., Aquino, S., Melo, R., & Eg-dio, J. (2019). A fog computing-based architecture for medical records management. Hindawi Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2019, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cerina, L., Notargiacomo, S., Greco, M., Paccani, L., & Santambrogio, M. D. (2017). A fog-computing architecture for preventive healthcare and assisted living in smart ambients. In: 2017 IEEE 3rd International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry (RTSI) (vol. 1, pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paul, A., Pinjari, H., Hong, W. H., Seo, H. C., & Rho, S. (2017). Fog computing-based IoT for health monitoring system. Hindawi Journal of Sensors, 2018, 1–7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumari, A., Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., & Kumar, N. (2018). Fog computing for Healthcare 4.0 environment: Opportunities and challenges. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 72, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dash, S., Biswas, S., Banerjee, D., & Rahman, A. (2019). Fog computing in healthcare - A review. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 20(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alesanco, A., & Garca, J. (2010). Clinical assessment of wireless ECG transmission in real-time cardiac telemonitoring. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 14(5), 1144–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kraemer, F., Braten, A., Tamkittikhun, N., & Palma, D. (2017). Fog computing in healthcare - A review and discussion. IEEE Translations and Content Mining, 5, 9206–9222.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rahmani, A., Gia, T., Negash, B., Anzanpour, A., Azimi, I., Jiang, M., et al. (2018). Exploiting smart e-Health gateways at the edge of healthcare Internet-of-Things: A fog computing approach. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vora, J., Tanwar, S., Verma, J. P., Tyagi, S., Kumar, N., Obaidat, M. S., et al. (2018). BHEEM: A blockchain-based framework for securing electronic health records. In IEEE Global Communications Conference (IEEE GLOBECOM-2018), Abu Dhabi (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tanwar, S., Parekh, K., & Evans, R. (2019). Blockchain-based electronic healthcare record system for healthcare 4.0 applications. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 50, 1–14.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hathaliya, J., Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., & Kumar, N. (2019). Securing electronics healthcare records in healthcare 4.0: A biometric-based approach. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 76, 398–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gia, T., Jiang, M., Rahmani, A., Westerlund, T., Liljeberg, P., & Tenhunen, H. (2015). Fog Computing in healthcare Internet-of-Things: A case study on ECG feature extraction. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akrivopoulos, O., Chatzigiannakis, I., Tselios, C., & Antoniou, A. (2017). On the deployment of healthcare applications over fog computing infrastructure. In IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Monteiro, A., Frana, R., Estrela, V., Iano, Y., Khelassi, A., & Razmjooy, N. (2018). Health 4.0: Applications, management, technologies and review. Medical Technologies Journal, 2(4), 262–276.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mahmud, R., Kotagiri, R., & Buyya, R. (2017). Fog computing: A taxonomy, survey and future directions. In B. Di Martino, K. C. Li, L. Yang, & A. Esposito (Eds.), Internet of Everything. Internet of Things (Technology, Communications and Computing) (pp. 103–130). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumari, A., Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., Kumar, N., Parizi, R., & Choo, K. K. R. (2019). Fog data analytics: A taxonomy and process model. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 128, 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naas, M., & Boukhobza, J. (2017). iFogStor: An IoT data placement strategy for fog infrastructure. In IEEE 1st International Conference on Fog and Edge Computing (ICFEC).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moysiadis, V., Sarigiannidis, P., & Moscholios, I. (2018). Towards distributed data management in fog computing. Hindawi Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thota, C., Sundarasekar, R., Manogaran, G., Varatharajan, R., & Priyan, M. K. (2018). Centralized fog computing security platform for IoT and cloud in healthcare system. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Fog Computing: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 365–378).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hamid, H., Mizanur Rahman, S. M., Shamim Hossain, M., Almogren, A., & Alamri, A. (2017). A security model for preserving the privacy of medical big data in a healthcare cloud using a fog computing facility with pairing-based cryptography. IEEE Translations and Content Mining, 5, 22313–22328.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hua, P., Dhelima, S., Ninga, H., & Qiud, T. (2017). Survey on fog computing: Architecture, key technologies, applications and open issues. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 98, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dastjerdi, A., Gupta, H., Calheiros, R., Ghosh, S., & Buyya, R. (2016). Fog computing: Principles, Architectures, and Applications. Internet of Things, 61–75.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hu, J., Wu, K., & Liang, W. (2019). An IPv6-based framework for fog-assisted healthcare monitoring. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Azimi, I., Anzanpour, A., Rahmani, A., Pahikkala, T., Levorato, M., & Liljeberg, P. et al. (2017). HiCH: Hierarchical fog-assisted computing architecture for healthcare IoT. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 16(5S), 174:1–174:20.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mutlag, A., Ghani, M., Arunkumar, N., Mohammed, M., & Mohd, O. (2019). Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare IoT systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 90, 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kahvazadeh, S., Souza, V., Masip, X., Marn Tordera, E., Garcia Almiana, J., & Daz, R. (2017). An SDN-based architecture for security provisioning in fog-to-cloud (F2C) computing systems (pp. 732–738). IEEE FTC Future Technologies Conference.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dubey, H., Monteiro, A., Constant, N., Abtahi, M., Borthakur, D., Mahler, L., et al. (2017). Fog computing in medical Internet-of-Things: Architecture, implementation, and applications, chapter in handbook of large-scale distributed computing in smart healthcare. In S. U. Khan, A. Y. Zomaya, & A. Abbas (Eds.), Handbook of large-scale distributed computing in smart healthcare, scalable computing and communications (pp. 1–29). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fratu, O., Pena, C., Craciunescu, R., & Halunga, S. (2015). Fog computing system for monitoring mild dementia and COPD patients, European union. In 2015 12th International Conference on Telecommunication in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS) (pp. 123–128).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Monteir, A., Dubey, H., Mahler, L., Yang, Q., & Mankodiya, K. (2016). FIT: A fog computing device for speech teletreatments. In IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Akrivopoulos, O., Amaxilatis, D., Antoniou, A., & Chatzigiannakis, I. (2017). Design and evaluation of a person-centric heart monitoring system over fog computing infrastructure. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Human-centered Sensing, Networking, and Systems (pp. 25–30).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sareen, S., Gupta, S., & Sood, S. (2017). An intelligent and secure system for predicting and preventing Zika virus outbreak using Fog computing. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(9), 1436–1456.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gia, T., Jiang, M., Rahmani, A., Westerlund, T., Mankodiya, K., Liljeberg, P., et al. (2015). Fog computing in body sensor networks: An energy efficient approach. In IEEE International Body Sensor Networks Conference (BSN).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tuli, S., Basumatary, N., Gill, S., Kahani, M., Arya, R., Wander, G., et al. (2020). HealthFog: An ensemble deep learning based smart healthcare system for automatic diagnosis of heart diseases in integrated IoT and fog computing environments. Future Generation Computing Systems, 104, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gia, T., Dhaou, I., Ali, M., Rahmani, A., & Westerlund, T. (2019). Energy efficient fog-assisted IoT system for monitoring diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease. Future Generation Computer Systems, 93, 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tanwar, S., Vora, J., Kanriya, S., Tyagi, S., Kumar, N., Sharma, V., et al. (2019). Human arthritis analysis in fog computing environment using Bayesian network classifier and thread protocol. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 9(1), 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Farahani, B., Firouzi, F., Chang, V., Badaroglu, M., Constant, N., & Mankodiya, K. (2018). Towards fog-driven IoT eHealth: Promises and challenges of IoT in medicine and healthcare. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78(2), 659–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Naas, M. I. (2019). iFogStorC: A heuristic for managing IoT data replication storage and consistency in a fog infrastructures. In Performance and Scalability of Storage Systems (Per3S) INRIA Bordeaux, Talence.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shivangi Surati
    • 1
  • Sanjay Patel
    • 1
  • Keyur Surati
    • 2
  1. 1.LDRP Institute of Technology and ResearchGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.AMC-MET Medical CollegeL.G. HospitalAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations