Advertisement

Large Deformation Analysis of Compliant Parallel Mechanisms

  • Chen QiuEmail author
  • Jian S. Dai
Chapter
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 139)

Abstract

Further the large deformation problem of compliant mechanisms is investigated in this chapter. As has been discussed in Sect.  4.4.4, when a compliant mechanism is under a large external load, the corresponding stiffness matrix is no longer symmetric and invariant. However, its force equilibrium still holds the same and it is used here to explore the compliant mechanism’s large deformation properties. It is straight forward to conduct inverse force analysis of compliant serial mechanisms and forward force analysis of compliant parallel mechanisms. However, additional consideration is needed for compliant mechanisms that have mixed configurations. In accordance with this, a repelling-screw based force analysis approach is developed in this chapter, making it possible to conduct a forward force analysis of compliant mechanisms that have hybrid combinations of flexible elements. This proposed force-modelling approach is further applied to analyze the large deformation behaviours of origami-inspired compliant mechanisms. An origami-inspired compliant mechanism is a foldable structure that consists of both panels and creases, which can be treated as an equivalent mechanism by taking panels as links and creases as revolute joints. Thus an origami mechanism can be treated as a parallel mechanism with revolute joints. Section 8.2 presents a complete experimental test of single creases of origami folds, which reveals an origami crease can be treated as a one-DOF flexible element with embedded torsional stiffness. This paves the way for the further force analysis of origami compliant structures using the proposed repelling-screw based approach. The theoretical background of this approach is provided in Sect. 8.3 in the framework of screw theory, and it is utilized to conduct force analysis of several typical origami compliant platforms in the following Sects. 8.4 and 8.5 respectively.

References

  1. 1.
    Kanade, T.: A theory of origami world. Artif. Intell. 13(3), 279–311 (1980)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lang, R.J., Hull, T.C.: Origami design secrets: mathematical methods for an ancient art. Math. Intell. 27(2), 92–95 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dai, J., Jones, J.R.: Kinematics and mobility analysis of carton folds in packing manipulation based on the mechanism equivalent. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 216(10), 959–970 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dai, J., Caldwell, D.: Origami-based robotic paper-and-board packaging for food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 21(3), 153–157 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Howell, L.L.: Compliant Mechanisms. Wiley-Interscience (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carroll, D.W., Magleby, S.P., Howell, L.L., Todd, R.H., Lusk, C.P.: Simplified manufacturing through a metamorphic process for compliant ortho-planar mechanisms. In: ASME 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp. 389–399. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winder, B.G., Magleby, S.P., Howell, L.L.: Kinematic representations of pop-up paper mechanisms. J. Mech. Robot. 1(2), 021009 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song, J., Chen, Y., Lu, G.: Axial crushing of thin-walled structures with origami patterns. Thin-Walled Struct. 54, 65–71 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma, J., You, Z.: Energy absorption of thin-walled square tubes with a prefolded origami pattern-part I: geometry and numerical simulation. J. Appl. Mech. 81(1), 011003 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zirbel, S.A., Lang, R.J., Thomson, M.W., Sigel, D.A., Walkemeyer, P.E., Trease, B.P., Magleby, S.P., Howell, L.L.: Accommodating thickness in origami-based deployable arrays. J. Mech. Des. 135(11), 111005 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, Y., Peng, R., You, Z.: Origami of thick panels. Science 349(6246), 396–400 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bassik, N., Stern, G.M., Gracias, D.H.: Microassembly based on hands free origami with bidirectional curvature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(9), 091901 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGough, K., Ahmed, S., Frecker, M., Ounaies, Z.: Finite element analysis and validation of dielectric elastomer actuators used for active origami. Smart Mater. Struct. 23(9), 094002 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, D.-Y., Kim, J.-S., Kim, S.-R., Koh, J.-S., Cho, K.-J.: The deformable wheel robot using magic-ball origami structure. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Portland, OR (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Onal, C.D., Wood, R.J., Rus, D.: An origami-inspired approach to worm robots. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 18(2), 430–438 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vander Hoff, E., Jeong, D., Lee, K.: Origamibot-i: a thread-actuated origami robot for manipulation and locomotion. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), pp. 1421–1426. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, K., Qiu, C., Dai, J.S.: Helical Kirigami-enabled centimeter-scale worm robot with shape-memory-alloy linear actuators. J. Mech. Robot. 7(2), 021014 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dai, J.S., Jones, J.R.: Mobility in metamorphic mechanisms of foldable/erectable kinds. J. Mech. Des. 121(3), 375–382 (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bowen, L.A., Grames, C.L., Magleby, S.P., Howell, L.L., Lang, R.J.: A classification of action origami as systems of spherical mechanisms. J. Mech. Des. 135(11), 111008 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hull, T.: On the mathematics of flat origamis. Congr. Numer. 215–224 (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, H., Dai, J.: Carton manipulation analysis using configuration transformation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 216(5), 543–555 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitani, J.: A design method for 3d origami based on rotational sweep. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 6(1), 69–79 (2009)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dai, J.S., Wang, D., Cui, L.: Orientation and workspace analysis of the multifingered metamorphic hand-metahand. IEEE Trans. Robot. 25(4), 942–947 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilding, S.E., Howell, L.L., Magleby, S.P.: Spherical lamina emergent mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory 49, 187–197 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bowen, L., Frecker, M., Simpson, T.W., von Lockette, P.: A dynamic model of magneto-active elastomer actuation of the waterbomb base. In: ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. V05BT08A051–V05BT08A051. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yao, W., Dai, J.S.: Dexterous manipulation of origami cartons with robotic fingers based on the interactive configuration space. J. Mech. Des. 130(2), 022303 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang, K., Fang, Y., Fang, H., Dai, J.S.: Geometry and constraint analysis of the three-spherical kinematic chain based parallel mechanism. J. Mech. Robot. 2(3), 031014 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wei, G., Dai, J.S.: Origami-inspired integrated planar-spherical overconstrained mechanisms. J. Mech. Des. 136(5), 051003 (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beex, L., Peerlings, R.: An experimental and computational study of laminated paperboard creasing and folding. Int. J. Solids Struct. 46(24), 4192–4207 (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Felton, S.M., Tolley, M.T., Shin, B., Onal, C.D., Demaine, E.D., Rus, D., Wood, R.J.: Self-folding with shape memory composites. Soft Matter 9(32), 7688–7694 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahmed, S., Lauff, C., Crivaro, A., McGough, K., Sheridan, R., Frecker, M., von Lockette, P., Ounaies, Z., Simpson, T., Lien, J., et al.: Multi-field responsive origami structures: preliminary modeling and experiments. ASME Paper No. DETC2013-12405 (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Delimont, I.L., Magleby, S.P., Howell, L.L.: Evaluating compliant hinge geometries for origami-inspired mechanisms. J. Mech. Robot. 7(1), 011009 (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dai, J.S., Cannella, F.: Stiffness characteristics of carton folds for packaging. J. Mech. Des. 130(2) (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qiu, C., Aminzadeh, V., Dai, J.S.: Kinematic analysis and stiffness validation of origami cartons. J. Mech. Des. 135(11), 111004 (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mentrasti, L., Cannella, F., Pupilli, M., Dai, J.S.: Large bending behavior of creased paperboard. I. Experimental investigations. Int. J. Solids Struct. 50(20), 3089–3096 (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mentrasti, L., Cannella, F., Pupilli, M., Dai, J.S.: Large bending behavior of creased paperboard. II. Structural analysis. Int. J. Solids Struct. 50(20), 3097–3105 (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hanna, B.H., Lund, J.M., Lang, R.J., Magleby, S.P., Howell, L.L.: Waterbomb base: a symmetric single-vertex bistable origami mechanism. Smart Mater. Struct. 23(9), 094009 (2014)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hanna, B.H., Magleby, S., Lang, R.J., Howell, L.L.: Force-deflection modeling for generalized origami waterbomb-base mechanisms. J. Appl. Mech. (2015)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Qiu, C., Vahid, A., Dai, J.S.: Kinematic analysis and stiffness validation of origami cartons. J. Mech. Des. 135(11), 111004 (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dai, J.S., Rees Jones, J.: Interrelationship between screw systems and corresponding reciprocal systems and applications. Mech. Mach. Theory 36(5), 633–651 (2001)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang, K., Qiu, C., Dai, J.S.: An origami-parallel structure integrated deployable continuum robot. In: Proceedings of ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, August 2–5, 2013. ASME, Boston (2015)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang, K., Fang, Y.: Kinematics and workspace analysis of a novel spatial 3-DOF parallel manipulator. Prog. Nat. Sci. 18(4), 432–440 (2008)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Murray, R.M., Li, Z., Sastry, S.S., Sastry, S.S.: A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation. CRC Press (1994)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lipkin, H., Duffy, J.: The elliptic polarity of screws. ASME J. Mech. Trans. Autom. Des. 107, 377–387 (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Innovation CentreNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of InformaticsKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations