Advertisement

Stable Dissipative Linear Stationary Dynamical Scattering Systems

  • D. Z. Arov
  • J. Rovnyak
Conference paper
Part of the Operator Theory: Advances and Applications book series (OT, volume 134)

Abstract

In the theory of passive linear electrical networks, the Darlington method is well known as a realization of a finite ideal passive 1-port with losses via a finite ideal passive lossless 2-port closed by one resistance [9]. The reflection coefficient Θ of such a 1-port is an element of the scattering matrix \(\tilde \Theta\) of a corresponding loss-less 2-port; the lossless behavior is indicated in the property that \(\tilde \Theta\) has unitary values on the boundary of the physical domain (in the right or upper half-plane, or inside the unit disk). The consideration of scattering matrices allowed Belevich to generalize Darlington’s result on finite ideal n-ports with losses [16]. Darlington himself did not consider Θ and \(\tilde \Theta\) but other frequency characteristics: the impedance Zof 1-ports and the transmission matrix à of 2-ports (Z and à have simple representations by means of Θ and \(\tilde \Theta\)). In this way, the Darlington result was generalized to finite ideal n-ports with losses by V.P. Potapov [14] and his student E.Ya. Melamud [12].

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    D. Alpay, A. Dijksma, J. Rovnyak, and H.S.V. de SnooSchur functions operator colligations and reproducing kernel Pontryagin spacesOper. Theory Adv. Appl., vol. 96, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D.Z. ArovRealization of matrix-valued functions according to DarlingtonIzv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 37 (1973), no. 6, 1299–1331, English transi.:Math. USSR Izvestija7(6): 1295–1326, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D.Z. ArovUnitary couplings with losses (a theory of scattering with losses)Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozen. 8 (1974), no. 4, 5–22, English transi.:Funct. Anal. Appl.8(4): 280–294, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D.Z. ArovStable dissipative linear stationary dynamical scattering systemsJ. Operator Theory 2 (1979), no. 1, 95–126.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D.Z. Arov, Asurvey on passive networks and scattering systems which are lossless or have minimal lossesAEU Archiv für Elektronik and Übertragungstechnik. International Journal of Electronics and Communication 49 (1995), no. 5/6, 252–265.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.Z. ArovPassive linear systems and scattering theoryDynamical systems, control, coding, computer vision (Padova, 1998), Birkhäuser, Basel, 1999, pp. 27–44.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D.Z. ArovConditions for the similarity of all minimal passive scattering systems with given scattering matrixFunkcional. Anal. i Priiozen. 34 (2000), no. 4, 71–74, English transi.:Funct. Anal. Appl.34(4): 293–295, 2000.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D.Z. Arov, M.A. Kaashoek, and D.R. PikMinimal and optimal linear discrete time-invariant dissipative scattering systemsIntegral Equations Operator Theory 29 (1997), no. 2, 127–154.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D.Z. ArovOptimal time-variant systems and factorization of operators. I. Minimal and optimal systemsIntegral Equations Operator Theory 31 (1998), no. 4, 389–420.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D.Z. ArovOptimal time-variant systems and factorization of operators. II. Factoriza- tionJ. Operator Theory 43 (2000), no. 2, 263–294.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D.Z. Arov and M.A. Nudel’manThe conditions of similarity of all minimal passive realizations of a given transfer function (scattering or resistence)submitted.1999Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    D.Z. ArovPassive linear stationary dynamical scattering systems with continuous timeIntegral Equations Operator Theory 24 (1996), no. 1, 1–45.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D.Z. ArovA criterion for the unitary similarity of minimal passive systems of scatter- ing with a given transfer functionUkraïn. Mat. Zh. 52 (2000), no. 2, 147–156.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M.G. Krein and H. LangerOber die verallgemeinerten Resolventen und die charakteristische Funktion eines isometrischen Operators im Raume HHilbert space operators and operator algebras (Proc. Internat. Conf., Tihany, 1970), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1972, pp. 353–399. Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai, 5.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    M.G. Krein and Ju.L. Smul’janFractional linear transformations with operator coefficientsMat. Issled 2 (1967), no. 3, 64–96, English transl.: Amer.Math. Soc. Transl.(2), vol. 103, pages 125–152, 1974.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Oleg NitzGeneralized resolvents of isometric linear relations in Pontryagin spaces. I. FoundationsOperator theory and related topics, Vol. II (Odessa, 1997), Birkhäuser, Basel, 2000, pp. 303–319.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Oleg NitzGeneralized resolvents of isometric linear relations in Pontryagin spaces. II. Krein-Langer formulaMethods Funct. Anal. Topology 6 (2000), no. 3, 72–96.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D.R. PikBlock lower triangular operators and optimal contractive systemsPh.D. thesis, Free University of Amsterdam, 1999.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Rosenblum and J. RovnyakHardy classes and operator theoryOxford University Press, New York, 1985, Dover republication, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    S.M. SaprikinThe theory of linear stationary passive scattering systems with Pontryagin state spacesDokl. Ukrainian Akad. Nauk, submitted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Z. Arov
    • 1
  • J. Rovnyak
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Mathematics Division of Mathematical AnalysisSouth-Ukrainian Pedagogical UniversityOdessaUkraine
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations