Advertisement

Towards a Safer and More Optimal Treatment of the Supracondylar Humerus Fracture

  • Mohamed Oussama Ben SalemEmail author
  • Olfa Mosbahi
  • Mohamed Khalgui
  • Georg Frey
Conference paper
  • 611 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 574)

Abstract

Treating the supracondylar humerus fracture, a very common elbow’s injury, can be very challenging for pediatric orthopedic surgeons. Actually, using the pinning technique to treat it leads sometimes to many neurological and vascular complications. Furthermore, the medical staff faces a serious danger when performing such surgeries because of the recurrent exposure to harmful radiations emitted by the fluoroscopic C-arm. Considering these issues, a national project was launched to create a new robotic platform, baptized BROS, to automate the supracondylar humerus fracture’s treatment and remedy the said issues. This chapter introduces this new robotic platform and uses a real case to prove the relevance and safety of BROS.

Keywords

Supracondylar humerus fracture Robot-assisted surgery e-Heath Reconfiguration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research work is carried out within a MOBIDOC PhD thesis of the PASRI program, EU-funded and administered by ANPR (Tunisia). The BROS national project is a collaboration between the Children Hospital of Bchir Hamza (Tunis), eHTC and INSAT (LISI Laboratory) in Tunisia. We thank the medical staff, Prof.Dr.med. Mahmoud Smida (Head of Child and Adolescent Orthopedics Service) and Dr.med. Zied Jlalia, for their fruitful collaboration and continuous medical support. A second paper is submitted in the conference for the modeling and verification of BROS.

References

  1. 1.
    Arbelaez, P., Maire, M., Fowlkes, C., Malik, J.: Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33(5), 898–916 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barton, K.L., Kaminsky, C.K., Green, D.W., Shean, C.J., Kautz, S.M., Skaggs, D.L.: Reliability of a modified Gartland classification of supracondylar humerus fractures. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 21(1), 27–30 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cardwell, M.: An IRB 120 robot picks and packs tubes of hair color into boxes for loreal canada. www.abb.com
  4. 4.
    Cleary, K., Nguyen, C.: State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges. Comput. Aided Surg. 6(6), 312–328 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clein, N.W.: How safe is X-ray and fluoroscopy for the patient andthe doctor? J. Pediatr. 45(3), 310–315 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mikaelsson, P., Curtis, M.: Portrait-robot d’un petit prodige: ABB prsente son nouveau robot IRB 120 et son armoire de commande IRC5 Compact. Rev. ABB 4, 39–41 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Connolly, C.: Technology and applications of ABB RobotStudio. Ind. Robot. Int. J. 36(6), 540–545 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emmerson, B.: IRB 120 inserting thermoplastic trays in to boxes for BDMO. www.abb.com
  9. 9.
    Flynn, J.C., Matthews, J.G., Benoit, R.L.: Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J. Bone Joint Surg. 56(2), 263–272 (1974)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gosens, T., Bongers, K.J.: Neurovascular complications and functional outcome in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Injury 34(4), 267–273 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grauman, K., Darrell, T.: Efficient image matching with distributions of local invariant features. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005, vol. 2, pp. 627–634. IEEE, June 2005Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haque, M.U., Shufflebarger, H.L., OBrien, M., Macagno, A.: Radiation exposure during pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is fluoroscopy safe? Spine 31(21), 2516–2520 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Judet, J.: Traitement des fractures sus-condyliennes transversales de lhumrus chez lenfant. Rev. Chir. Orthop. 39, 199–212 (1953)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kwoh, Y.S., Hou, J., Jonckheere, E.A., Hayati, S.: A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 35(2), 153–160 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lagrange, J., Rigault, P.: Fractures supracondyliennes. Rev. Chir. Orthop. 48, 337–414 (1962)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Landin, L.A.: Fracture patterns in children: analysis of 8,682 fractures with special reference to incidence, etiology and secular changes in a swedish urban population 1950–1979. Acta Orthop. 54(S202), 3–109 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Landin, L.A., Danielsson, L.G.: Elbow fractures in children: an epidemiological analysis of 589 cases. Acta Orthop. 57(4), 309–312 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pirone, A.M., Graham, H.K., Krajbich, J.I.: Management of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J. Bone Joint Surg. 70(5), 641–650 (1988)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rampersaud, Y.R., Foley, K.T., Shen, A.C., Williams, S., Solomito, M.: Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine 25(20), 2637–2645 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robotics, A.B.B.: Application Manual: Motion Coordination and Supervision, Robot Controller, RobotWare 5.0. Vsters, Sweden (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smida, M., Smaoui, H., Jlila, T.B., Saeid, W., Safi, H., Ammar, C., Ghachem, M.B.: Un index de stabilit pour lembrochage percutan latral parallle des fractures supracondyliennes du coude chez lenfant. Rev. Chir. Orthop. Rparatrice Appar. Mot. 93(4), 404 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsai, R.Y.: A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 3(4), 323–344 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Oussama Ben Salem
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Olfa Mosbahi
    • 2
  • Mohamed Khalgui
    • 2
  • Georg Frey
    • 3
  1. 1.Polytechnic School of TunisiaUniversity of CarthageTunisTunisia
  2. 2.LISI Laboratory, INSATUniversity of CarthageTunisTunisia
  3. 3.Chair of Automation and Energy SystemsSaarland UniversitySaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations