Shale Development and Mexico

  • Thomas TunstallEmail author
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 39)


The opportunities for unconventional or shale oil and gas production in Mexico remain at the earliest stages of development. The bulk of Mexico’s shale prospects appear to lie in the North and Northeastern sections of the country, where the infrastructure is often largely undeveloped. While significant hurdles remain with regard to the ultimate success of energy reform in general, and shale oil and gas development in particular. If these issues can be addressed, Mexico will be in a position to recapture its role as an energy leader in America.


Shale Formation Energy Information Administration Mexican Government West Texas Intermediate Eagle Ford Shale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Darrah T, Vengosh A, Jackson R, Warner N, Poreda R (2014) Nobel gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(39):14076–14081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Economist (2015) After OPEC. May 16, 2015. ISSN: 0013-0613Google Scholar
  3. Energy Information Administration (2013) Technically recoverable shale and shale gas reserves: An assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States. Department of Energy, USGoogle Scholar
  4. Frohlich C (2012) Two-year survey comparing earthquake activity and injection-well locations in the Barnett Shale, Texas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(35):13934–13938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gold R (2015) What the future of oil drilling will look like. Wall Street JGoogle Scholar
  6. Hinton D (2012) The seventeen-year overnight wonder: George Mitchell and unlocking the Barnett Shale. J Am Hist 99(1):229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klooster D (2003) Campesinos and Mexican forest policy during the twentieth century. Latin Am Res Rev 38(2):94–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mills M (2015) Shale 2.0: Technology and the coming big-data revolution in America’s shale oil fields. Manhattan Institute Center for Energy Policy and the EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  9. Perramond E (2008) The rise, fall, and reconfiguration of the Mexican Ejido. Geogr Rev 98(3):356–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Posner E, de Figueiredo M (2005) Is the international court of justice biased? J Legal Stud 34(2):599–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Siegel D, Azzolina N, Smith B, Perry E, Bothun R (2015) Methane concentrations in water wells unrelated to proximity to existing oil and gas wells in Northeastern Pennsylvania. Environ Sci Technol 49(7):4106–4112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tunstall T, Oyakawa J, Eid H, Conti G, Diaz-Wells M, Hernandez J, Lee Y, Loeffelholz V, Ravi N, Rodriguez J, Teng F, Torres C, Torres H, Wang B, Zhang J (2014). Economic impact of the Eagle Ford Shale. University of Texas at San Antonio Institute for Economic DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  13. Tunstall T, Oyakawa J, Eid H, Bueno A, Smith J, Rodríguez Ibáñez P, Chapa Cantú J, Acuña Zepeda M, Lugo Serrato O, (2015) Economic impact and legal analysis of the shale oil and gas activities in Mexico: Preliminary report. University of Texas at San Antonio and Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo LeónGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations