Advertisement

Reynolds-Stress and Scalar Flux Transport Model

  • Anupam DewanEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.5k Downloads

Abstract

This chapter presents modeled forms of the Reynolds stress and scalar flux transport equations. It is shown that the modeling of several terms of the exact Reynolds stress and scalar flux transport equation is far more complex than that of the turbulence kinetic energy equation. As a result the Reynolds stress and scalar flux transport models do not always produce more accurate results compared to the two-equation models. Finally the advantages and disadvantages of such models are compared with those of the two-equation models by means of examples from the literature.

Keywords

Reynolds Stress Reynolds Shear Stress Reynolds Stress Model Scalar Dissipation Rate Moment Closure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chen HC, Patel VC (1988) Near-wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation. AIAA J 26(6):641–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen HC, Jang YJ, Han JC (2000) Computation of heat transfer in rotating two-pass square channels by a second-moment closure model. Int J Heat Mass Transf 43:1603–1616zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daly BJ, Harlow FH (1970) Transport equations in turbulence. Phys Fluids 13:2634–2649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gerolymos GA, Neubauer J, Sharma VC, Vallet I (2002) Improved prediction of turbomachinery flows using near-wall Reynolds-stress model. Trans ASME J Turbomach 124:86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hanjalic K (2005) Will RANS survive LES? A view of perspectives. ASME J Fluids Eng 127(5):831–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanjalic K, Launder BE (1976) Contribution towards a Reynolds stress closure for low-Reynolds-number turbulence. J Fluid Mech 74(4):593–610zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hanjalic K, Hdzic I, Jakirlic S (1999) Modelling of turbulent wall flows subjected to strong pressure variations. ASME J Fluids Eng 121:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jia R, Sundén B, Faghri M (2007) A new low Reynolds-stress transport model for heat transfer and fluid in engineering applications. Trans ASME J Heat Transf 129:434–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Launder BE (1989) Second-moment closure: present and future? Int J Heat Fluid Flow 10(4):282–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Launder BE, Reece GJ, Rodi W (1975) Progress in the development of Reynolds stress turbulence closure. J Fluid Mech 68(3):537–566zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lien FS, Leschziner MA (1994) Assessment of turbulent transport models including non-linear RNG eddy viscosity formulation and second-moment closure. Comp Fluids 23:983–1004zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pathak M, Dewan A, Dass AK (2006) Computational prediction of a slightly heated turbulent rectangular jet discharged into a narrow channel crossflow using two different turbulence models. Int J Heat Mass Transf 49(21–22):3914–3928zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rodi W (1976) A new algebraic relation for calculating Reynolds stresses. ZAMM 56:219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rossi R, Philips DA, Iaccarino G (2009) Numerical simulation of scalar dispersion in separated flows using algebraic flux models. Turbul Heat Mass Transf 6:1–12Google Scholar
  15. Said NM, Mhiri H, Bournot H (2008) Experimental and numerical modelling of the three-dimensional incompressible flow behaviour in the near wake of circular cylinders. J Wind Eng Ind Aero 96:471–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Speziale CG, Sarkar S, Gatski S (1991) Modeling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach. J Fluid Mech 227:245–272zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tummers MJ, Hanjalic K, Passchier DM, Henkes RAWM (2007) Computations of a turbulent wake in a strong adverse pressure gradient. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 28:418–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wagner JH, Johnson BV, Kopper FC (1991) Heat transfer in rotating serpentine passage with smooth walls. J Turbomach 113(3):321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilcox DC (2006) Turbulence modeling for CFD, DCW Industries Inc, La Canada, CA 91011, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsIndian Institute of Technology, DelhiHauz KhasIndia

Personalised recommendations