Advertisement

The Reassigned Spectrogram

  • Sean A. FulopEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)

Abstract

This chapter introduces a relatively new modified form of the spectrogram which has variously been described by the term reassigned, or by the phrase time-corrected instantaneous frequency. While the latter is more descriptive of the scheme, the former is shorter and seems to have gained supremacy in the (still rather sparse) literature on the subject. The reassignment process yields a modification of a spectrogram which effectively “sharpens” it, concentrating the smeared out spectrographic points around tighter lines in both the frequency and time dimensions. This approach relies on the understanding of the spectrogram as showing instantaneous frequencies of line components, and sharpens that view of things while doing away with the idea of showing how energy is distributed in the time–frequency plane.

Keywords

Instantaneous Frequency Line Component Mixed Partial Derivative Kaiser Window Phonation Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Castelli, P. Perrier, P. Badin, Acoustic considerations upon the low nasal formant based on nasopharyngeal tract transfer function measurements, in Eurospeech ’89, pp. 2412–2415 (ISCA, Kolkata, 1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Dang, K. Honda, An improved vocal tract model of vowel production implementing piriform resonance and transvelar nasal coupling, in: ICSLP-1996, pp. 965–968 (ISCA, Kolkata, 1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Fant, Acoustic Theory of Speech Production (Mouton, The Hague, 1960). Reissued 1970Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.L. Flanagan, Speech Analysis, Synthesis and Perception, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin , 1972)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.A. Fulop, Phonetic applications of the time-corrected instantaneous frequency spectrogram. Phonetica 64, 237–62 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.A. Fulop, Accuracy of formant measurement for synthesized vowels using the reassigned spectrogram and comparison with linear prediction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127(4), 2114–7 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.A. Fulop, S.F. Disner, Advanced time–frequency displays applied to forensic speaker identification, in Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, vol.6. Acoustical Society of America (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.A. Fulop, K. Fitz, Algorithms for computing the time-corrected instantaneous frequency (reassigned) spectrogram, with applications. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119(1), 360–71 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.A. Fulop, K. Fitz, Separation of components from impulses in reassigned spectrograms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121(3), 1510–8 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.A. Fulop, E. Kari, P. Ladefoged, An acoustic study of the tongue root contrast in Degema vowels. Phonetica 55(1–2), 80–98 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.A. Fulop, P. Ladefoged, F. Liu, R. Vossen, Yeyi clicks: acoustic description and analysis. Phonetica. 60(4), 231–60 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.J. Gardner, M.O. Magnasco, Sparse time–frequency representations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103(16), 6094–9 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.G. Guion, M.W. Post, D.L. Payne, Phonetic correlates of tongue root vowel contrasts in Maa. J. Phonetics 32, 517–42 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F.J. Harris, On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proc. IEEE 66(1), 51–83 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Ito, M. Yano, Sinusoidal modeling for nonstationary voiced speech based on a local vector transform. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121(3), 1717–27 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Kodera, R. Gendrin, C. de Villedary, Analysis of time-varying signals with small BT values. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-26(1), 64–76 (1978)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Kodera, C. de Villedary, R. Gendrin, A new method for the numerical analysis of non-stationary signals. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 12, 142–50 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Ladefoged, I. Maddieson, M. Jackson, Investigating phonation types in different languages. In: O. Fujimura (eds) Vocal Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms, and Functions, (Raven Press, New York, 1988)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.S. McGowan, An aeroacoustic approach to phonation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83(2), 696–704 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L.K. Montgomery, I.S. Reed, A generalization of the Gabor–Helstrom transform. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-13, 344–345 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D.J. Nelson, Special purpose correlation functions for improved signal detection and parameter estimation, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 73–76 (1993)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D.J. Nelson, Cross-spectral methods for processing speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110(5), 2575–2592 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D.J. Nelson, Instantaneous higher order phase derivatives. Digital Signal Process. 12, 416–428 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.D. Plumpe, T.F. Quatieri, D.A. Reynolds, Modeling of the glottal flow derivative waveform with application to speaker identification. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 7(5), 569–86 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T.F. Quatieri, Discrete-Time Speech Signal Processing. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A.W. Rihaczek, Signal energy distribution in time and frequency. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-14(3), 369–74 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M.R. Schroeder, B.S. Atal, Generalized short-time power spectra and autocorrelation functions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34(11), 1679–1683 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C.H. Shadle, A. Barney, P.O.A.L. Davies, Fluid flow in a dynamical mechanical model of the vocal folds and tract II: Implications for speech production studies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105(1), 456–66 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    K.N. Stevens, Acoustic Phonetics (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J.W. Strutt (Baron Rayleigh), The Theory of Sound, vol. II, 2nd edn. (1896)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    W. Zhao, C. Zhang, S.H. Frankel, L. Mongeau, Computational aeroacoustics of phonation, part I: computational methods and sound generation mechanisms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112(5), 2134–46 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsCalifornia State University FresnoFresnoUSA

Personalised recommendations