Cognitive Capabilities of a Parallel System

  • James A. Anderson
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 20)


There has been recent interest in parallel, distributed, associative models as ways of organizing powerful computing systems and of handling noisy and incomplete data. There is no doubt such systems are effective at doing some interesting kinds of computations. Almost certainly they are intrinsically better suited to many kinds of computations than traditional computer architecture.


State Vector Semantic Network Atomic Fact Alphanumeric Character Cross Connection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J.A. Two models for memory organization using interacting traces. Mathematical Biosciences., 8, 137–160, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.A. Cognitive and psychological computation with neural models. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 799–815, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.A. & Hinton, G.E. Models of information processing in the brain. In G.E. Hinton & J.A. Anderson (Eds.), Parallel Models of Associative Memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J.A., Silverstein, J.W., Ritz, S.A. & Jones, R.S. Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model. Psychological Review. 84, 413–451, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, P.J. & Anderson, J.A. Non-analytic aspects of mathematics and their implications for research and education. SIAM Review., 21, 112–127, 1979.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Geman, S. & Geman, D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE; Proceedings on Artificial and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–741, November, 1984.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodman, A.G., Goodman, L.S., & Gilman, A. The Pharmacological Basis of Theraputics. Sixth Edition. New York: MacMillan, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. Golden, R. Identification of the BSB neural model as a gradient descent technique that minimizes a quadratic cost function over a set of linear inequalities. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  9. Hadamard, J. The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  10. Hinton, G.E. & Sejnowski, T.J. Optimal pattern inference. IEEE Conference on Computers in Vision and Pattern Recognition.. 1984.Google Scholar
  11. Hopfield, J.J. Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-stateneurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 81, 3088–3092, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. James, W. Briefer Psychology. (Orig. ed. 1890). New York: Collier, 1964.Google Scholar
  13. Kawamoto, A. Dynamic Processes in the (Re)Solution of Lexical Ambiguity. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Psychology, Brown University. May, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. Knapp, A.G. & Anderson, J.A. Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition., 10, 616–637, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kohonen, T. Associative Memory. Berlin: Springer, 1977.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kohonen, T. Self Organization and Associative Memory. Berlin: Springer, 1984.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Riley, M. S. & Smolensky, P. A parallel model of sequential problem solving. Proceedings of Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Boulder, Colorado: 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • James A. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations