Advertisement

Progress on Edinburgh Ducks

  • S. H. Salter
Conference paper
Part of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics book series (IUTAM)

Summary

This paper describes the work of the Edinburgh group on their duck. It reviews the techniques used to improve device productivity by controlling both power take-off and mounting-movement. It outlines the results of a test programme on long compliant spines and discusses costing methodology. Some future developments are suggested.

Keywords

Atomic Energy Authority Repayment Period Central Electricity Generate Equivalent Spine Mooring Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Salter, S. H.; Wave Power. Nature, vol 249, pp720–724, June 21, 1974.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edinburgh Wave Power Project; 1st Year Interim Report. September 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    British Patent C2224/76. January 1976.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edinburgh Wave Power Project; 4th Year Report, vol 1. July 1978.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salter, S.H.; Jeffrey, D.C.; Taylor, J.R.M.; The Architecture of Nodding Duck Wave Power Generators. The Naval Architect pp 21–24, January 1976.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evans, D.V. et al; Submerged Cylinder wave energy device: Theory and Experiment. Applied Ocean Research, vol 1, pp 3–12, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Young, H.E., Pollock, J.; Variable Coefficient Control of a Wave Energy Device. Edinburgh Wave Power Project report. March 1985.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bisceglia, S.; Economic Feasibility of Cam-type Wave Power Generators. MSc dissertation. Department of Ocean Engineering M.I.T. June 1978.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salter, S.H.; Absorbing Wavemakers and Wide Tanks. ASCE Directional Wave Spectra Applications Conference, pp185–202. Berkeley. 1981.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salter, S.H.; Physical Modelling of Directional Seas. Symposium on Description and Modelling of Directional Seas, ppB1.1-B1.9., Copenhagen June 1984.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Retzler, C.H.; Long Spines in Multi-directional Seas. Ibid, ppB5.1-B5.10.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edinburgh Wave Power Report; Bending Moments in Long Spines. 1984.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rendel, Palmer and Tritton; Analysis of Civil Construction Costs. Consultant’s Working Paper Number 36. July 1981.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rendel, Palmer and Tritton; Technical Appraisal of the Edinburgh Duck Volume 3D (ETSU WV 1570P26). June 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Edinburgh, Merz and McLellan, Laing; Report to Department of Energy. October 1981.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    CEGB Report and Accounts, p10. March 1984.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y-ARD; Reliability Study of the Salter Duck. Report YR 2814/81 appendix 3 fig A3. 8. 1981.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y-ARD; Comparison of Mechanical and Hydraulic Transmission Systems for Aerogenerators. Report YR 2788 Y 2407 pA1. 3. 3. December 1982.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor, R.; A Coda to the 1982 Duck Assessment, WESC(85)P702. 1985.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mehlum, E.; The Wavetrack Software Package. Norwave A.S. — undated technical literature.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Platts, J.; Spirally Wound Elastic Mooring and Tube-Pump. WESC(79)MA72.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Single Buoy Moorings (DBV) Ltd.; A Study on the Assessment of Costs for Installing and Maintaining Mooring Systems for Wave Energy Devices. WESC(80)MA115. 1980.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wimpey Laboratories Ltd.; Anchorages for Wave Energy Devices. Report number ST51/82 WESC(82)MA135. March 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. H. Salter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of EdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations