Advertisement

Pump-Probe Spectroscopy — Revisited

  • P. R. Berman
Conference paper
  • 536 Downloads

Abstract

A theory of pump probe spectroscopy is carried out using an amplitude approach in a bare state basis. The interplay between absorption and emission is clearly defined in this approach. Both closed and open systems are considered. The theory is applied to a calculation of the dispersion-like structure that appears when the probe frequency is nearly equal to the pump frequency, in the limit of large pump field detuning. The theory is extended to include a class of problems in which the recoil atoms undergo on the absorption or emission of radiation leads to resonance structures. The relationship of these recoil-induced resonances to the collective atomic recoil laser is discussed. The probe gain which occurs without level inversion in these systems cannot be viewed as a parametric process, in its normal sense.

Keywords

Central Resonance Probe Absorption Bose Condensate Pump Field Probe Gain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See, for example, G. S. Agarwal and N. Nayak, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. B 1 (1984) 164; H. Friedman and A. P. Wilson-Gordon, Phys. Rev. A 36 (1987) 1333; N. B. Manson, C. Wei, and J. P. D. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 3943; H. S. Freedhoff and Z. Ficek, Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 1296.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. A 5 (1972) 2217.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haroche and Hartmann [S. Haroche and F. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. A 6 (1972) 1280] obtained the probe absorption spectrum in the context of velocity-tuned resonances in the theory of saturated absorption. They interpreted the structure centered near 5 = 0 as a competition between the two processes shown in Fig. 3 (a),(b) (which cancel exactly in our model). In the context of the relaxation model used in their paper, their amplitude interpretation does not appear to be justified.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Y. Wu, S. Ezekiel, M. Ducloy, and B. R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 1077 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Cohen-Tannoudji and S. Reynaud, J. Phys. B 10 (1977) 345.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Khitrova, P. R. Berman, and M. Sargent III J. Opt. Soc. Amer. B 5 (1988) 160; P. R. Berman, V. Finkelstein, and J. Guo, in Laser Spectroscopy X,edited by M. Ducloy, E. Giacobino, and G. Camy (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992) pps. 15–20.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Grynberg and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Optics Comm. 96 (1993) 150.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2627 (1996).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Guo, P. R. Berman, B. Dubetsky, and G. Grynberg, Phys. Rev. 46, 1426 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Bonifacio and L. De Salvo, Nucl. Instrum Methods Phys. Res. A 341, 360 (1994).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Moore and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3248 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 59, 585 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    It is also possible to carry out the calculations using fields that are turned on adiabatically. The final steady state results are identical, but the contributions from individual diagrams differ for the two approaches.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Dubetsky and P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 1294.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. R. Berman and G. Khitrova, Opts. Comm, to appear.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. M. Stamper-Kurn, A. Chikkatur, A. Görlitz, S. Inouye, S. Gupta, D. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, cond-matter/9906035; Phys. Rev. Lett., to appear.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Y. Courtois, G. Grynberg, B. Lounis, and P. Verkerk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3017 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. E. Lamb, Jr., Phys. Rev. 134, A1429 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Inouye, A. Chikkatur, D. Stamper-Kurn, J. Stenger, D. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Science 285, 571 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. Lu and P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 44 (1991) 5965.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. R. Berman
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations