Advertisement

The Laser Phase Transition Analogy and the Partition Function for Bose Condensation of N Atoms in a Trap

  • Marlan O. Scully
Conference paper
  • 520 Downloads

Abstract

In Ref. [1] [PRL 82, 3927, (1999)] the first analytical calculation of the partition function for the N-atom Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) was carried out. At the conference the question was raised: Is the partition function thus obtained the same as the usual statistical mechanical one? We here show that it is and also present recent improvements of the theory.

Keywords

Partition Function Master Equation Heat Bath Physical Review Letter Harmonic Trap 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3927 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Kocharovsky, M. O. Scully, S.-Y. Zhu, M. S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A, Feb. (2000).Google Scholar
  3. [1]
    a) M. Anderson, J. Ensher, M. Matthews, C. Wieman, and E. Cornell, Science 269, 198 (1995);Google Scholar
  4. (b).
    C. Bradley, C. Sackett, J. Tollett, and R. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1687 (1995);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (c).
    K. Davis, M. Mewes, M. Andrews, N. van Dmten, D. Durfee, D. Kum, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [2]
    BEC has been confirmed by the groups of Hänsch, Hau, Heinzen, Kasevich, Phillips, and Rempe.Google Scholar
  7. [3]
    In the experiments of the J. Reppy group at Cornell [see, e.g., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1950 (1988)1, they prepare a dilute Bose gas by confining He° in a porous medium.Google Scholar
  8. [4]
    See, e.g., J. Wolfe, J. Lin, and D. Snoke, in Bose Einstein Condensation, edited by A. Griffin, D. Snoke, and S. Stringari ( Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1995 ), p. 281.Google Scholar
  9. [5]
    M. Andrews, C. Townsend, H.-J. Miesner, D. Durfee, D. Kum, and W. Ketterle, Science 275, 637 (1997);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Andrews, C. Townsend, H.-J. Miesner, D. Durfee, D. Kum, and W. Ketterle see also A. Röhrl, M. Naraschewski, A. Schenzle, and H. Wallis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4143 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Andrews, C. Townsend, H.-J. Miesner, D. Durfee, D. Kum, and W. Ketterle For a discussion of the “phase” of a Bose condensate, see A. Leggett, in Bose Einstein Condensation (Ref. [4]), p. 452.Google Scholar
  12. [6]
    See especially the time evolution experiments by H.-J. Miesner, D. Stamper-Kum, M. Andrews, D. Durfee, S. Inouye, and W. Ketterle [Science 279, 1005 (1998)] and the theoretical work of D. Jaksch, C. Gardiner, K. Gheri, and P. Zoller [Phys. Rev. A 58, 1450 (1998)] and C. Sackett, H. Stoff, and R. Hulet [Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2031 (1998)].Google Scholar
  13. [7] The classic works in Bose gas physics by Bogolubov, Huang, Lee, and Yang are well presented by K. Huang [Statistical Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1987), Chap. 19].
    See also R. Arnowitt and M. Girardeau, Phys. Rev. 113, 745 (1959).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. For more recent work, see G. Baym and C. Pethick [Phys. Rev. Lett 76, 6 (1996)] and the forthcoming review article by S. Stringari et al. (http://www.lanl.gov).Google Scholar
  15. [8]
    For fluctuations in a Bose gas, see H. Politzer, Phys. Rev. A 54, 5048 (1996);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Grossmann and M. Holthaus, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3495 (1996);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. C. Herzog and M. Olshanii, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3254 (1997);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Navez, D. Bitouk, M. Gajda, Z. Idziaszek, and K. Rzaaewski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1789 (1997);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Wilkens and C. Weiss, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 1801 (1997);MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Grossmann and M. Holthaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3557 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [9]
    For the quantum theory of the laser as developed by Haken and Risken using Fokker-Planck techniques, that of Lax and Louisell using a quantum noise approach, and the density matrix treatment of Lamb and Scully, see, for example, M. Scully and S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1997 ).Google Scholar
  22. [10]
    Insightful “atom-laser” papers include M. Holland, K. Burnett, C. Gardiner, J. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 54, R1757 (1996);Google Scholar
  23. A. Guzman, M. Moore, and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. A 53, 977 (1996);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. H. Wiseman, A. Martins, and D. Walls, Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 8, 737 (1996);Google Scholar
  25. U. Janicke and M. Wilkens, Europhys. Lett. 35, 561 (1996);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Olshanii, Y. Castin, and J. Dalibard, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Laser Spectroscopy, edited by M. Inguscio, M. Allegrini, and A. Lasso ( World Scientific, Singapore, 1995 ).Google Scholar
  27. [11]
    As R. Glauber taught us [Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963)], pure coherent light is characterized by Poissonian photon statistics. The quantum theory of lasers shows that partially coherent laser light also has a sharp photon distribution (with width several times Poissonian for a typical He-Ne laser ). Laser coherence is due to the fact that after emission the atoms become absorbers and this saturation nonlinearity is essential for producing a sharply peaked photon distribution.Google Scholar
  28. [12]
    V. DeGiorgio and M. Scully, Phys. Rev. A 2, 1170 (1970);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R. Graham and H. Haken, Z. Phys. 237, 31 (1970).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [13]
    Daniel Kleppner, Phys. Today 50, No. 8, l l (1997).Google Scholar
  31. [14]
    We agree with Wilkens and Weiss, Ref. [8], who point out that “an ideal Bose gas with a fixed total number of particles must in fact he considered weakly interacting if one prefers to work in the grand-canonical ensemble.”Google Scholar
  32. [15]
    J. Goldstein, M. Scully, and P. Lee, Phys. Lett. 35A, 317 (1971) contains another example.Google Scholar
  33. [16]
    The leading term (6) Ono = f (T/T T ) 312 in the case of a harmonic trap. Politzer, Ref. [8), finds Ana = 14’(2)/ 4 . (3) L / 2 +%N(T/T..) 3 I2. The prefactor [4 (2)/5(3)]I/2 = [18] 1.2. We consider the agreement to be satisfactory for the present purposes. However, in a future paper we will present analysis including the prefactor.Google Scholar
  34. [17]
    We do not consider the dynamics of the Bose atoms as they are shuffled between excited states, but rather assume that they are in thermal equilibrium with the reservoir. That is, we assume that the excited states of the trap are [20] adequately thermalized so as to allow this simplifying assumption. This should be a good approximation for the majority of atoms in the excited states.Google Scholar
  35. [18]
    For a useful summary of BEC in various external potentials, see V. Bagnato, D. Pritchard, and D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. A 35, 4354 (1987).Google Scholar
  36. [19]
    In an important paper, W. Ketterle and N. van Druten [Phys. Rev. A 54, 656 (1996)] show that for “1000 particles the transition temperature is lowered to 79%” of the usual definition.Google Scholar
  37. [20]
    M. Sargent, M. Scully, and W. Lamb, Appl. Opt. 9, 2423 (1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlan O. Scully
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Institute for Quantum StudiesTexas A & M UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Max-Planck Institute für QuantenoptikGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations