Advertisement

Global Aspects of Linearization, Equivalence to Polynomial Forms and Decomposition of Nonlinear Control Systems

  • Witold Respondek
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics and Its Applications book series (MAIA, volume 29)

Abstract

In the last fifteen years a theory for nonlinear control systems has been developed using differential geometric methods. Many problems have been treated in this fashion and interesting results have been obtained for nonlinear equivalence, decomposition, controllability, observability, optimality, synthesis of control (with desired properties: decoupling or noninteracting), linearization and many others. We refer the reader to Sussmann [28] for a survey and bibliography. We want to emphasize only that in most of the papers devoted to nonlinear control systems (using geometric methods) only a local viewpoint is presented. This is due to two kinds of obstructions: singularities of the studied objects (functions, vector fields, distributions) and topological obstructions for the global existence of the sought solutions.

Keywords

Vector Field Polynomial Form Nonlinear Control System Control Letter Global Linearization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    D. Aeyels, ‘Local and global controllability for nonlinear systems’, Systems and Control Letters, 5(1984), 19–26.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    W.M. Boothby, ‘Some comments on global linearization of nonlinear systems’, Systems and Control Letters, 4(1984), 143–147.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    W.M. Bothby, ‘Global feedback linearizability of locally linearizable systems’, this volume.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R.W. Brockett, ‘Feedback invariants for nonlinear systems’ in: Proc. IFAC Congress, Helsinki 1978.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    P. Brunovsky, ‘A classification for linear controllable systems’, Kybernetica, 6(1970), 173–188.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    W. Dayawansa, W.M. Boothby and D.L. Elliot, ‘Global state and feedback equivalence of nonlinear systems’, Systems and Control Letters, 6(1985), 229–234.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Fliess, ‘Cascade decomposition of nonlinear systems, foliations and ideals of transitive Lie algebras’, to appear in Systems and Control Letters.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Fliess, ‘Décomposition en cascades des systèmes automatiques et feuilletages invariants’, to appear in Bull. Soc. Math. France.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J.W. Grizzle and S.I. Marcus, ‘The structure of nonlinear control systems possessing symmetries’, to appear in IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Hermann, ‘On the accessibility problem in control theory’, Internat. Symp. on Nonlinear Differential Equations and Nonlinear Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, 1963, 325–332.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. Hermann and A.J. Krener, ‘Nonlinear controllability and observability’, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 12 (1977), 728–740.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Hirschorn, ‘Global controllability of nonlinear systems’, SIAM J. Contr. Opt., 14(1976), 700–711.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    L.R. Hunt and R. Su, ‘Linear equivalents of nonlinear time varying systems’, Int. Symp. Math. Theory of Networks and Systems, Santa Monica, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    L.R. Hunt, R. Su and G. Meyer, ‘Global transformations of nonlinear systems’, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 28 (1983)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Isidori, A.J. Krener, C. Gori-Giorgi and S. Monaco, ‘Nonlinear decoupling via feedback: A differential geometric approach’, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 26 (1981), 331–345.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    B. Jakubczyk and W. Respondek, ‘On linearization of control systems’, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci, Ser. Sci. Math., 28(1980), 517–522.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A.J. Krener, ‘On the equivalence of control systems and linearization of nonlinear systems’, SIAM J. Contr. Opt., 11 (1973), 670–676.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A.J. Krener, ‘A decomposition theory for differentiable systems’, SIAM J. Contr. Opt. 15 (1977), 813–829.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    A.J. Krener and A. Isidori, ‘Linearization by output injection and nonlinear observers’, Systems and Control Letters, 3 (1983), 47–52.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    A.J. Krener and W. Respondek, ‘Nonlinear observers with linearizable dynamics’, SIAM J. Control. Opt., 23 (1985), 197–216.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    H. Kunita, ‘On the controllability of nonlinear systems with applications to polynomial systems’, Appl. Math. Optim, 5(1979), 89–99.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    J. Levine and R. Marino, Quelques applications des méthodes géometriques aux problèmes stochastiques, “last minute result” presented at the Conference on the Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Non-linear Control Theory, Paris ’85.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    T. Nagano, ‘Linear differential systems with singularities and application to transitive Lie algebras’, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 18 (1966), 398–404.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    R.S. Palais, ‘A globar formulation of the Lie theory of transformation groups’, Amer. Math. Soc. (1957), no. 22.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    W. Respondek, ‘On decomposition of nonlinear control systems’, Systems and Control Letters, 1 (1982), 301–308.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    W. Respondek, ‘Geometric methods in linearization of control systems, in: Banach Center Publications, vol. 14, Mathematical Control Theory, Eds. Cz. Olech, B. Jakubczyk and J. Zabczyk, PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 1985, 453–467.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    R. Su, ‘On the linear equivalents of nonlinear systems’, Systems and Control Letters, 2 (1982), 48–52.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    H.J. Sussmann, ‘Lie brackets, real analyticity and geometric control’ in: Differential Geometric Control Theory, Eds. R.W. Brockett, R.S. Millman and H.J. Sussmann, Birkhauser, Boston, 1983, 1–116.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    H.J. Sussmann, ‘An extension of a theorem of Nagano on transitive Lie algebras’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 45 (1974), 349–356.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    H.J. Sussmann, ‘A generalization of the closed subgroup theorem to quotionts of arbitrary manifolds’, J. Differential Geometry, 10 (1975), 151–166.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    H.J. Sussmann, ‘Existence and uniqueness of minimal realization of nonlinear systems’, Math. Systems Theory, 10 (1977), 263–284.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    H.J. Sussmann, Lie bracketes and real analyticity in control theory, in: Banach Center Publications, vol.14, Mathematical Control Theory, Eds. Cz. Olech, B. Jakubczyk and J. Zabczyk, PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 1985, 515–542.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    M. Zeitz, Controllability canonical (phase-variable) form for non-linear time-variable systems, Int.J. Control, 37 (1983), 1449–1457.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Witold Respondek
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of MathematicsPolish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations