Advertisement

The Confused God: About a Metaphor in Literary Semiotics

  • Sandro Briosi
Chapter
  • 125 Downloads

Abstract

A recurring metaphor in general discourse as well as in specialized criticism describes the phenomenon of narration in terms of the author’s position in a “world” with which he maintains certain relationships. It is a spatial metaphor and seems quite clear, but its apparent clarity turns opaque as soon as we try to derive further heuristic conclusions from it. We regard it as quite obvious, for instance, that the author of an autobiography takes up his stance inside his world, to the point of being the very incarnation of his narrator — as opposed to the realistic writer, who views his world from the outside, or, should he have any populistic or paternalistic leanings, even from above. Yet experience has shown how easily such a classification may fall apart. Verga, the great novelist of the Italian type of realism known as verismo formulated the theory of the total detachment of the author, of his being reduced to a neutral and “impersonal” recording instrument. It is precisely this impersonality, however, that places the author in a position of “weakness” relative to the Sicilian world he is describing. The very effort of erasing all preconceived notions and feelings, of wiping his inner slate clean, so to speak, carries a “risk”: the author’s personality may become wholly dominated by the outside world. And when that happens, the author who wants to eliminate all temptation of intervening in the story — and who therefore somehow attempts to detach himself from it — will paradoxically find that his desire to stay outside it makes him view it entirely from the inside; so that the literary work as Verga wanted it to be seems “to have come into being of its own creation.”

Keywords

Literary Work Internal Focus Heuristic Conclusion Linguistic Code Spatial Metaphor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Camus, Albert: 1942, L’étranger, Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Croce, Benedetto: 1902, Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale, Laterza, Bari.Google Scholar
  3. Eco, Umberto: 1979, Lector in fabula, Bompiani, Milano.Google Scholar
  4. Ferrucci, Franco: 1976, Il mondo creato, Mondadori, Milano.Google Scholar
  5. Gadamer, Hans G.: 1960, Wahrheit und Methode, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen. Genette, Gérard: 1972, Figures III, Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Husserl, Edmund: 1950, Ideen zu einer reinen phänomenologischen Philosophie I, Nijhoff, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  7. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: 1945, Phénoménologie de la perception, Gallimard, Paris. Ricoeur, Paul: 1975, La métaphore vive, Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Turbayne, Colin M.: 1962, The Myth of Metaphor, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  9. Verga, Giovanni. 1880, ‘L’amante di Gramigna’, in Vita dei campi (ed. 1968), Mondadori, Milano.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandro Briosi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations