Advertisement

Instructional Design: A Conceptual Parallel Processor for Navigating Learning Space

  • Robert Maribe Branch
Chapter

Abstract

Instructional design is a process used to generate curriculum, courses, teaching units, and single episodes of guided learning. While instructional design is applicable for curriculum development, and in many types of teaching environments, this is a presentation about how instructional design can be conceived as a way to navigate in spaces dedicated to intentional [or guided] learning. Guided learning is purported to be complex because the student, the content, the media, the teacher, peers, and the context, all interacting within a discrete period of time; while moving toward a common goal. The instructional design concept suggested here is intended to be a way to respond to the complexities of guided learning. The contention is that the fundamental purpose of instructional design is to 1) respond to a performance discrepancy that is attributable to a lack of knowledge and skills, 2) generate learner-centered strategies, and 3) validate the products and procedures used for episodes of guided learning; and to accomplish theses processes parallel to each other.

Key words

Instructional design Instructional development Instructional systems Learner-centered Parallel processing Curriculum development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, D.H. and Goodson, L.A., 1980, A comparative analysis of models of instructional design, Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balachandran, I. and Branch, R., 1997, Continuing professional education among Cytotechnologists: Reasons for participation, The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 17, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banathy, B.H., 1987, Instructional systems design, In Gagné, R.M. (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 85–112), Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  4. Banathy, B.H., 1991, Educational systems design:A journey to create the future, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  5. Braden, R.A., 1996, The case for linear instructional design and development: A commentary on models, challenges, and myths, Educational Technology, 26(3), 5–23.Google Scholar
  6. Branch, R., 1996, Instructional design as a response to the complexities of instruction, In Venkataiah, N. (Ed.), Educational Technology (pp. 21–49), Ashish Publishing House, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  7. Branch, R., 1997, Perceptions of instructional design process models, In Griffin, R.E., Beauchamp, D.G., Hunter, J.M. and Schiffman, C.B. (Eds.), Selected Readings of the 28th Annual Convention of the International Visual Literacy Association, Cheyenne, WY.Google Scholar
  8. Branch, R. and Gustafson, K.L., 1998, Re-visioning models of instructional development, A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, St. Louis, MI.Google Scholar
  9. Dick, W. and Carey, L., 1996, The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.), Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL.Google Scholar
  10. Dills, C.R. and Romiszowski, A.J., 1997, The instructional development paradigm: An introduction, In Dills, C.R. and Romiszowski, A.J. (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 5–30), Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Earle, R., 1998, Instructional design and teacher planning: Reflections and perspectives, In Branch, R. and Fitzgerald, M. (Ed.), Educational technology and media yearbook (pp. 29–41), Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO.Google Scholar
  12. Edmonds G., Branch, R. and Mukherjee, P., 1994, A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J. and Wager, W.W., 1992, Principles of instructional design (4th ed.), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Gustafson, K.L., 1981, Survey of instructional development models, ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources, Syracuse University (IR-81).Google Scholar
  15. Gustafson, K.L., 1991, Survey of instructional development models (2nd ed.) [with an annotated ERIC bibliography by G.C. Powell], ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse University:(IR-91).Google Scholar
  16. Gustafson, K.L. and Branch, R., 1997a, Survey of instructional development models (3rd ed.), ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse University (IR-103).Google Scholar
  17. Gustafson, K.L. and Branch, R., 1997b, Revisioning models of instructional development, Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuhn, T.S., 1962, 1970, The structure of scientific resolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  19. Merriam-Webster, 1991, Webster’s ninth new collegiate dictionary, Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, Springfield, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Moallem, M. and Earle, R.S., 1998, Instructional design models and teacher thinking: Toward a new conceptual model for research and development, Educational Technology, 38(2), 5–22.Google Scholar
  21. Reiser, R.A. and Dick, W., 1996, Instructional planning: A guide for teachers (2nd ed.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  22. Rossett, A., 1993, Needs assessment, In Anglin, G.J. (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (2nd ed.) (pp. 156–169), Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO.Google Scholar
  23. Seels, B. and Glasgow, Z., 1998, Making instructional design decisions, Merrill, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, R.L.M., 1986, An analysis of development and design models for microcomputer-based instruction, Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1986), University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  25. Tripp, S. and Bichelmeyer, B., 1990, Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy, Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Maribe Branch
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of GeorgiaUSA

Personalised recommendations