Advertisement

The Guided Approach to Instructional Design Advising (GAIDA): A Case-based Approach to Developing Instructional Design Expertise

  • Dennis Gettman
  • Theresa McNelly
  • Daniel Muraida
Chapter

Abstract

The problem of developing instructional design expertise in Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) has persistently plagued training organizations. This chapter presents a description of the development of an electronic performance support system as one potential remedy. The Guided Approach to Instructional Design Advising (GAIDA) was developed at the Air Force Research Laboratory as part of the Advanced Instructional Design Advisor (AIDA) project. GAIDA offers an on-line, case-based approach to developing instructional design expertise in novice instructional developers. The history, theory, and design of GAIDA are described. Past and on-going evaluation efforts are presented along with recommendations and future direction.

Key words

Instructional design Instructional development Automated instructional development Electronic performance support systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carroll, J.M. and Olson, J.R., 1988, Mental models in human-computer interaction, In Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. Dorsey, D.W. and Foster, L.L., 1996, An application of knowledge structure assessment in the computer knowledge domain: Relations with experience and implications for training, Symposium paper presented in R. Klimoski’s, Knowledge Structures and Training: Measurement and Validity Issues, 11th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  3. Gagné, R.M., 1992, Try out of an organizing strategy for lesson design: maintenance procedure with checklist, Brooks AFB, TX, Air Force Research Laboratory (AL-TP-1992-0016).Google Scholar
  4. Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J. and Wager, W.W., 1992, Principles of instructional design (4th ed.), Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Gagné, R.M. and Perkins-Driskoll, M., 1988, Essentials of learning for instruction (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Goldstein, I.L., 1993, Training in organizations, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Hickey, A.E., Spector, J.M. and Muraida, D.J., 1992, Design specifications for the Advanced Instructional Design Advisor (AIDA), Air Force Research Laboratory (AL-TR-1991-0085-Vol. 2), Brooks AFB, TX.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson-Laird, P., 1983, Mental models, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kirkpatrick, D.L., 1987, Evaluation of training, In Craig, R.L. (Ed.), Training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development (3rd ed.), McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Kraiger K., Ford, J.K. and Salas, E., 1992, Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rouse, W.B. and Morris, N.M., 1986, On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models, Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tennyson, R.D. and Gettman, D.J., in press, GAIDA evaluation report:Student learning, quality, attitudes, and perceptions, Air Force Research Laboratory, Brooks AFB, TX.Google Scholar
  13. Wenzel, B.M., Dirnberger, M.T. and Ellis, R., 1998, April, Evaluation of the instructional effectiveness of distributed interactive multimedia courseware for emergency medical technician training, Paper presented at the Sixteenth Biennial Applied Behavioral Sciences Symposium, USAF Academy Department of Behavioral Sciences and Leadership, Colorado Springs, CO.Google Scholar
  14. Wenzel, B.M., Keeney, C, Licklider J., Roberts, J.D. and Reyna, H., 1997, August, Evaluation of the courseware developed and delivered using the Experimental Advanced Instructional Design Advisor, Presentation at the annual meeting of the Texas Association of College Technical Educators, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  15. Wexley, K.N. and Latham, G.P., 1991, Developing and training human resources in organizations, Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Gettman
    • 1
  • Theresa McNelly
    • 2
  • Daniel Muraida
    • 3
  1. 1.United States Air ForceUSA
  2. 2.Development Dimensions InternationalUSA
  3. 3.United States Air Force Research LaboratoryUSA

Personalised recommendations