Advertisement

Learning the Lessons of Piper Alpha?

Offshore workers’ perceptions of changing levels of risk
  • David Whyte
Chapter
  • 139 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 16)

Abstract

Since the death of 167 offshore workers on the Piper Alpha installation in July 1988, and the subsequent establishment of a new regulatory regime in the offshore oil and gas industry, much has been made of a renewed commitment to safety shown by the operating oil companies and service companies in the industry. The operating companies cite the o5 billion targeted for improvements in safety since Piper Alpha [for example, Brandie, 1994/5], and the apparent success of the post Piper Alpha safety committee system [for example, BBC TV, 1996] as proof that a former complacency towards standards of safety offshore has changed. In addition, the United Kingdom Offshore Operators Association (UKOOA, the oil companies’ collective organisation) have begun regularly to refer to official Health and Safety Executive (HSE) data, which appear to show a gradual decline in reported injury rates [for example: UKOOA, 1994b and BBC Radio Scotland, 1996].

Keywords

Trade Union Operating Company Safety Case Safety Regime Consultation Exercise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BBC Radio Scotland (1996) ‘Colin Bell Show’, 5 February.Google Scholar
  2. BBC TV (1996) Frontline Scotland. Paying the Price of Piper, 16 May.Google Scholar
  3. Brandie, E (1994/5) ‘Achieving the Balance Between Safety and Cost Reduction’ in Offshore International, Winter.Google Scholar
  4. Carson, WG (1982) The Other Price of Britain’s Oil: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Channel 4 (1994) Wasted Windfall, October.Google Scholar
  6. Cati G and Frazer F (1983) The Nation’s Oil: A story of control, London: Graham and Trotman. CRINE Report (nd) Founding Statement for the Cost Reduction Initiative For The New Era.Google Scholar
  7. Eggar, T (1993) ‘Notes for Speech to the Cost Reduction Conference,’ 2 December.Google Scholar
  8. Pate-Cornell, E (1993) ‘Learning From the Piper Alpha Accident: A postmortem analysis of technical and organisational factors’, Risk Analysis, Vol. 13 No 2.Google Scholar
  9. Foster, J And Woolfson, C (1992) Trade Unionism And Health And Safety Rights In Britain’s Offshore Oil Industry, London: International Centre For Trade Union Rights.Google Scholar
  10. Gasteen, A and Sewel, J (1995) The Aberdeen Offshore Oil Industry: Core and Periphery’, in Rubery, J, Employer Strategy and the Labour Market, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Harvie, C (1994) Fools Gold: The story of North Sea Oil, London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  12. HSE (1995) An Interim Evaluation of the Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 1992.Google Scholar
  13. James, P (1993) The European Community: A positive force for UK health and safety law?, London: London Institute of Employment Rights.Google Scholar
  14. Lavelette, M and Wright, C (1991) The Cullen Report - making the North Sea safe? Critical Social Policy, July.Google Scholar
  15. McKay, DI and McKay GA (1975) The Political Economy of North Sea Oil, London: Mart in Robertson.Google Scholar
  16. Noreng, O (1985) The Oil Industry and Government Strategy in the North Sea, Boulder Colorado: The International Research Centre for Energy and Economic Development.Google Scholar
  17. OILC (1991) Striking Out: New directions for offshore workers: Aberdeen: Offshore Information CentreGoogle Scholar
  18. OILC (1994) Safety Auditing from Below, Paper presented to the Conference on Human factors in Offshore safety, Aberdeen, 27–28 September.Google Scholar
  19. Risley, AW (1995) The Challenges of the Nineties’ in Offshore International, October.Google Scholar
  20. Rutledge I and Wright P (1996) Taxing the Second North Sea Oil Boom: A fair deal or a raw deal? University of Sheffield, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  21. Spaven, M Ras, H Morrison, A and Wright, C (1993) The effectiveness of Offshore Safety Representatives: A report to the Health and Safety Executive, London: HSE.Google Scholar
  22. The Hon. Lord Cullen (1990) The Public Enquiry Into The Piper Alpha Disaster, Cm 1310, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  23. Todd, I (1996) Better Business is Better Safety, paper presented to ‘CRINE: Learning to Survive’, The Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, London, 31st January - 1st February 1996.Google Scholar
  24. Tombs, S (1991) Piper Alpha And The Cullen Inquiry. Beyond “Distorted Communication”?, In Cox, R.F. And Walter, M.H., Eds., Offshore Safety And Reliability, London: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
  25. Tombs, S (1995) ‘Law, Resistance and Reform: ‘Regulating’ safety crimes in the UK’, Social and Legal Studies, Vol. 4.Google Scholar
  26. UKOOA (1994a) ‘Reduction of Burdens on Business: DTI Deregulation Initiative’, letter sent to all members of UKOOA, 7 March 1994.Google Scholar
  27. UKOOA (1994b) Minutes of the Council Meeting, 11 May.Google Scholar
  28. Walters, D (1995) Employee Representation and Occupational Health and Safety: The significance of Europe, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol 8, No 6.Google Scholar
  29. Whyte, D Tombs, S and Smith, D (1996) Not Required Back (or Don’t Rock the Boat if you Want to Keep Your Job). Occupational Safety and Health, January.Google Scholar
  30. Woolfson, C (1995a) ‘The Deregulation of the British Continental Shelf - the Hidden Agenda’ in Offshore Safety in a Cost Conscious Environment, Aberdeen: Offshore Information Centre.Google Scholar
  31. Woolfson, C and Beck, M (1995b) Seven Years After Piper Alpha: Safety Claims and the New Safety Cage Regime, Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Whyte
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations