Advertisement

German Second Home Development in Sweden

  • Dieter Müller
Chapter
Part of the The GeoJournal Library book series (GEJL, volume 65)

Abstract

Second home tourism is probably the most researched interface between tourism and migration (Williams and Hall, 2000). The reasons for that are quite obvious. First, research on tourism suffers from a lack of comprehensive and reliable data. In contrast second homes are often covered in national property cadastres and thus well documented and relatively easy to research. Nevertheless, most studies focus on smaller areas or do not provide a comprehensive picture of the entire spectrum of second home ownership (Bohlin, 1982; Halseth, 1993; Halseth and Rosenberg 1995; Wolfe 1951). Alternatively, the level of analysis does not penetrate beyond the administrative levels (Ragatz, 1970; Clout, 1972; Clout, 1977; Löhr, 1989; Buller and Hoggart, 1993). Second, research on second homes addresses land use issues and thus a core topic of geographical research. Most second home buyers as well as other migrants are led by lifestyle considerations and bear a certain positive image of the countryside in their minds, sometimes based more on fictional sources than real experience (Tuan, 1974; Short, 1991; Bunce, 1994; Butler and Hall, 1998; Riley et al. 1998). Hence, the encounter with the rural population and the rural traditions does not occur without tension (see Chapter Ten). Finally, the purchase of a second home in the countryside also entails a long-term commitment to the host community including an increasing involvement into local issues. Several studies show that this process, sometimes labeled rural gentrification (Phillips, 1993), results in newcomers and the local population sharing the rural space but live in separate domains (Halseth 1993; Phillips, 1993; Müller, 1999). Particularly because the second home owners consume the countryside as a recreational resource only, research on second home ownership is tightly connected to research on contested.

Keywords

Home Ownership Place Attachment Rural Tourism Home Area Permanent Migration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bohlin, M. (1982) Fritidsboendet i den regionala ekonomin: vart fritidshusägarnas pengar tar vägen, Geografiska regionstudier 14, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  2. Buller, H. and Hoggert, K. (1993) International Counterurbanization: British Migrants in Rural France,Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  3. Bunce, M. (1994) The Countryside Ideal: Anglo-American Images of Landscape, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, R.W. and Hall, C.M. (1998) Image and reimaging of rural areas, in R. Butler, C.M. Hall and J. Jenkins (eds), Tourism and Recreation in Rural Areas, Wiley, Chicester, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
  5. Bylund, E. (1960) Theoretical considerations regarding the distribution of settlement in inner north Sweden, Geografiska Annaler 42, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavaco, C. (1995) Rural tourism: the creation of new tourist spaces, in A. Montanan and A.M. Williams (eds), European Tourism: Regions, Spaces, Restructuring, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 127–149.Google Scholar
  7. Clout, H.D. (1972) Second homes in the United States, Tijdschrift voor economische och Sociale Geografie 63, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clout, H.D. (1977) Résidence secondaires in France, in J.T. Coppock (ed.), Second Homes: Curse or Blessing? Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
  9. Dangschat, J.S. and Herfert, G. (1997) Wohnsuburbanissierung im Umland von Oberzentren 1993–1995, in Atlas Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Pilotband, IIL, Leipzig, pp. 58–61.Google Scholar
  10. Hägerstrand, T. (1953) Innovationsförloppet ur korologisk synpunkt,Meddelanden fr$n Lunds universitets geografiska institution 25, Lund.Google Scholar
  11. Halseth, G. (1993) Communities with communities: changing residential areas at Culthus Lake, British Columbia. Journal of Rural Studies 9, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halseth, G. and Rosenberg, M.W. (1995) Cottagers in an urban field, Professional Geographer 47, 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Helfer, M. (1993) Tourismus auf Rügen: Chancen und Risiken der Umstrukturierung infolge der deutschen Einigung,Arbeiten aus dem Geographischen Instituts der Universität des Saarlandes 40, Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
  14. Hinz, H. and Vollmer, R. (1993) Sun City (West): Seniorensiedlung im Südwesten der USA, Die Erde 124, 77–85.Google Scholar
  15. Hoggart, K. and Buller, H. (199) Property agents as gatekeepers in British house purchases in rural France, Geoforum 25, 173–187.Google Scholar
  16. Institut für Freizeitwirtschaft (1990) Informationen über die neue Marktuntersuchung `Der Markt für Ferienwohnungen und Ferienhäuser bis 1995, München.Google Scholar
  17. Jenkins, J.M., Hall, C.M. and Troughton, M. (1998) The restructuring of rural economies: rural tourism and recreation as a government response, in R. Butler, C.M. Hall and J. Jenkins (eds), Tourism and Recreation in Rural Areas, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 43–67.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, A. (1994) The New Germany: A Human Geography, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  19. Löhr, D. (1989) Deutscher Ferienhausbesitz in Südschweden, Münchener Geographische Hefte 62, 69–110.Google Scholar
  20. Lundgren, J.O.J. (1974) On access to recreational lands in dynamic metropolitan hinterlands, Tourist Review 29, 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaltenborn, B.P. (1997a) Nature of place attachment: a study among recreation homeowners in Southern Norway, Leisure Sciences 19, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaltenborn, B.P. (1997b) Recreation homes in natural settings: factors affecting place attachment, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 51, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaltenborn, B.P. (1998) The alternate home: motives of recreation home use, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 52, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King, R., Warnes, A.M., and Williams, A.M. (1998) International retirement migration in Europe, International Journal of Population Geography 4, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kontuly, T. and Schön, K.P. (1994) Changing western German internal migration systems during the second half of the 1980s, Environment and Planning A 26, 1521–1543.Google Scholar
  26. MacCannell, D. (1993) The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class, 3rd ed., MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  27. Müller, D.K. (1995) Svenska fritidshus under tysk flagg: tysk fritidshusturism i Kronobergs och Kalamr län, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umei.Google Scholar
  28. Müller, D.K. (1999) German Second Home Owners in the Swedish Countryside: On the Internationalization of the Leisure Space,European Tourism Research Institute, Östersund.Google Scholar
  29. Nordin, U. (1993) Second homes, in H. Aldskogius (ed.), Cultural Life, Recreation and Tourism, National Atlas of Sweden, SNA, Stockholm, pp. 72–79.Google Scholar
  30. Pettersson, R. (1999) Foreign Second Home Purchases: The Case of Northern Sweden, 199096, Working Paper 1999:14, Centre for Regional Science, Ume$.Google Scholar
  31. Phillips, M. (1993) Rural gentrification and the processes of class colonization, Journal of Rural Studies 9, 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Riley, R., Baker, D. and van Doren, D.S. (1998) Movie induced tourism, Annals of Tourism Research 25, 919–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodriguez, V., Fernández-Mayoralas, G. and Rojo, F. (1998) European retirees on the Costa del Sol: a cross national comparison, International Journal of Population Geography 4, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogers, A. (1989) The elderly mobility transition: growth, concentration and tempo, Research on Ageing 11, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Short, J.R. (1991) Imagined Country: Society, Culture and Environment, Routledge, London. Spiekermann, K. (1997) Berufspendler: die Trennung von Wohnort und Arbeitsplatz, in Atlas der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Pilotband, IfL, Leipzig, pp. 92–93.Google Scholar
  36. Tuan, Y. (1974) Topophilia, Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, A.M. and Hall, C.M. (2000) Tourism and migration: new relationships between production and consumption, Tourism Geographies 2, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams, A.M., King, R., Warnes, A. and Patterson, G. (2000) Tourism and international retirement migration: new forms of an old relationship in southern Europe, Tourism Geographies 2, 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams, A.M. and Montanari, A. (1995) Introduction: tourism and economic restructuring in Europe, in A. Montanan and A.M. Williams (eds), European Tourism: Regions, Spaces, Restructuring, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, A.M. and Patterson, G. (1998) An empire lost but a province gained? A cohort analysis of British international retirement migration in the Algavre, International Journal of Population Geography 4, 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, D.R. and Kaltenbom, B.P. (1999) Leisure places and modernity: the use and meaning of recreational cottages in Norway and USA, in D. Crouch (ed.), leisure/tourism geographies: practices and geographical knowledge, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 214–230.Google Scholar
  42. Wolfe, R.I. (1951) Summer cottages in Ontario, Economic Geography 27, 10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolfe, R.I. (1977) Summer cottages in Ontario: purpose-built for an essential purpose, in J.T. Coppock (ed.), Second Homes: Curse or Blessing?, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 17–33.Google Scholar
  44. Zelinsky, W. (1971) The hypothesis of the mobility transition, Geographical Review 71, 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dieter Müller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social and Economic GeographyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations