• Kwangjo Kim
  • Muhamad Erza Aminanto
  • Harry Chandra Tanuwidjaja
Part of the SpringerBriefs on Cyber Security Systems and Networks book series (BRIEFSCSSN)


This chapter discusses the importance of IDS in computer networks while wireless networks grow rapidly these days by providing a survey of a security breach in wireless networks. Many methods have been used to improve IDS performance, the most promising one is to deploy machine learning. Then, the usefulness of recent models of machine learning, called a deep learning, is highlighted to improve IDS performance, particularly as a Feature Learning (FL) approach. We also explain the motivation of surveying deep learning-based IDSs.


Intrusion Detection System (IDS) Deep Learning Methods Stacked Denoising Auto-encoder (SDAE) Ransomware Deep Boltzmann Machine (DBM) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    A. Osseiran, F. Boccardi, V. Braun, K. Kusume, P. Marsch, M. Maternia, O. Queseth, M. Schellmann, H. Schotten, H. Taoka, H. Tullberg, M. A. Uusitalo, B. Timus, and M. Fallgren, “Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: The vision of the metis project,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 26–35, May 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Kolias, A. Stavrou, J. Voas, I. Bojanova, and R. Kuhn, “Learning internet-of-things security” hands-on”,” IEEE Security Privacy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Alvarez, N. Bradley, P. Cobb, S. Craig, R. Iffert, L. Kessem, J. Kravitz, D. McMilen, and S. Moore, “IBM X-force threat intelligence index 2017,” IBM Corporation, pp. 1–30, 2017.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Kolias, G. Kambourakis, and M. Maragoudakis, “Swarm intelligence in intrusion detection: A survey,” Computers & Security, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 625–642, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. G. Fragkiadakis, V. A. Siris, N. E. Petroulakis, and A. P. Traganitis, “Anomaly-based intrusion detection of jamming attacks, local versus collaborative detection,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 276–294, 2015.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Sommer and V. Paxson, “Outside the closed world: On using machine learning for network intrusion detection,” in Proc. Symp. Security and Privacy, Berkeley, California. IEEE, 2010, pp. 305–316.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Anthes, “Deep learning comes of age,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 13–15, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. H. Farooqi and F. A. Khan, “Intrusion detection systems for wireless sensor networks: A survey,” in Proc. Future Generation Information Technology Conference, Jeju Island, Korea. Springer, 2009, pp. 234–241.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Zuech, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, and R. Wald, “Intrusion detection and big heterogeneous data: a survey,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 3, 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Schmidhuber, “Deep learning in neural networks: An overview,” Neural Networks, vol. 61, pp. 85–117, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Deng, “A tutorial survey of architectures, algorithms, and applications for deep learning,” APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, vol. 3, 2014.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Deng, D. Yu, et al., “Deep learning: methods and applications,” Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing, vol. 7, no. 3–4, pp. 197–387, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Silver, A. Huang, C. J. Maddison, A. Guez, L. Sifre, G. Van Den Driessche, J. Schrittwieser, I. Antonoglou, V. Panneershelvam, M. Lanctot, et al., “Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search,” Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484–489, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Motoda and H. Liu, “Feature selection, extraction and construction,” Communication of IICM (Institute of Information and Computing Machinery), Taiwan, vol. 5, pp. 67–72, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Tran, S. Picek, and B. Xue, “Automatic feature construction for network intrusion detection,” in Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning. Springer, 2017, pp. 569–580.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. E. Aminanto, R. Choi, H. C. Tanuwidjaja, P. D. Yoo, and K. Kim, “Deep abstraction and weighted feature selection for Wi-Fi impersonation detection,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 621–636, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Hamed, J. B. Ernst, and S. C. Kremer, “A survey and taxonomy on data and pre-processing techniques of intrusion detection systems,” in Computer and Network Security Essentials. Springer, 2018, pp. 113–134.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kwangjo Kim
    • 1
  • Muhamad Erza Aminanto
    • 1
  • Harry Chandra Tanuwidjaja
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computing (SoC)Korea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations