Advertisement

Introduction

  • Ali RiazEmail author
Chapter
  • 114 Downloads
Part of the Politics of South Asia book series (POSAS)

Abstract

Discussion of regimes which are ostensibly democratic but essentially authoritarian, described as Hybrid Regimes, abounds. Extant studies have analyzed various aspects of these emergent regimes and underscored the importance of elections as a tool in the continuation of the system. However, these studies have seldom examined the mechanisms of the manipulation of the election in detail. This chapter addresses this gap and employs the framework in analyzing the 2018 parliamentary election in Bangladesh which delivered an unprecedented victory for the incumbent Bangladesh Awami League (BAL). The chapter also summarizes the key arguments of the remaining eight chapters of the book.

Keywords

Election Bangladesh Bangladesh Awami League Bangladesh Nationalist Party 

Bibliography

  1. Cassani, Andrea. 2012. “Hybrid what? The contemporary debate on hybrid regimes and the identity question.” Italian Society of Political Science, Roma.Google Scholar
  2. Cheeseman, Nicholas, and Brian Klaas. 2018. How to Rig an Election. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dyer, Gwynne, and Hamilton Spectator. 2019. In Bangladesh, a struggling democracy is effectively dead. January 02. Accessed February 24, 2019. https://www.thespec.com/opinion-story/9106131-in-bangladesh-a-struggling-democracy-is-effectively-dead.
  4. Hasan, Mubashar, and Arild Engelsen Ruud. 2019. The Geopolitics of the 2018 Parliamentary Elections in Bangladesh. February 6. Accessed February 6, 2019. https://www.e-ir.info/2019/02/06/the-geopolitics-of-the-2018-parliamentary-elections-in-bangladesh/?fbclid=IwAR1SJoyFdBdReYrtQfpJyKkW1NQ-DbWBx2exR_6UKZB_SjvPTwfYBI9omxA.
  5. Islam, Arafatul. 2019. West’s ‘worrying’ support for Bangladeshi PM Sheikh Hasina. January 10. Accessed February 08, 2019. https://www.dw.com/en/wests-worrying-support-for-bangladeshi-pm-sheikh-hasina/a-47019921.
  6. Kugelman, Michael. 2019. A disputed election and a dangerous new era for Bangladesh’s politics. January 01. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/01/opinions/bangladesh-election-oped-intl/index.html.
  7. Lindberg, Staffan I. 2009. Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Milam, William B. 2019. “Civilian Coup d’etat.” The Friday Times. January 11.Google Scholar
  9. O’Donnel, Guillermo, and Phillippe Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Petrov, Nikolay, Maria Lipman, and Henry E. Hale. 2014. “Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Slater, Joanna, and Azad Majumder. 2018. Why Bangladesh’s landslide election result is bad for its democracy. December 31. Accessed January 01, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2018/12/31/why-bangladeshs-landslide-election-result-is-bad-its-democracy/?utm_term=.96578871f2b3.
  12. The Economist. 2019. Obituary of a democracy: Bangladesh. January 30. Accessed January 31, 2019. https://espresso.economist.com/0390aff9c68eeb7b64fbebe21c878de3.
  13. The Guardian. 2018. Bangladesh PM Hasina wins thumping victory in elections opposition reject as farcical. December 31. Accessed January 2, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/30/bangladesh-election-polls-open-after-campaign-marred-by-violence.
  14. The New York Times. 2019. Bangladesh’s Farcical Vote. January 14. Accessed January 15, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/14/opinion/editorials/bangladesh-election-sheikh-hasina.html.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and GovernmentIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations